Posted on 10/17/2017 6:56:35 AM PDT by ImJustAnotherOkie
The actor, who can't be named for legal reasons has been accused of assaulting a loved one(See below)
In a reference to Weinstein, she said on social media it was “time the dominoes fell”. We are not naming the star or his accuser for legal reasons.
But an insider said: “Rumours about this actor have circulated for years.
“Lots of people are making allegations after what’s happened with Weinstein.
“But no alleged victim of this particular man has spoken publicly as yet.”
The A-lister’s outing came as it emerged yesterday:
BRIT actress Andrea Riseborough said she experiences “sexually inappropriate behaviour” every week EX-Pussycat Doll Kaya Jones compared the band to a “prostitution ring” NYPD revealed they are now probing two new allegations against Weinstein SCOTLAND Yard is investigating five sexual assault claims against him from three British women BRIT telly star Jessica Hynes accused Weinstein of forcing her to audition in a bikini aged 19
(Excerpt) Read more at thesun.co.uk ...
Pedophile SECRECY is ENABLING
What is that? A check register? From when? Whose?
Loved one victim not named...
Accused Oscar-winning actor not named....
Solid reporting.
Yeah. All that means is the accused are liberals they don't want to "tarnish". I'm sure if the were conservatives, or suspected as such, they'd be named.
No kidding. One, it would have spared us every Whoopie Goldberg, Oprah and Meryl Streep movie, to name a few.
Two, it's HOLLYWOOD, for pete's sake. You want to wear a burkha?
Three, she could have walked right out the door. Ditz.
“They are named just not by this publication because of potential lawsuits.”
*****
British papers will report many things censored by the U.S. media. However, when it comes to potential defamation claims, they curb their reporting.
The reason for this is that, unlike the U.S., truth of the assertion isn’t a defense in a defamation suit over there. That’s why you’ll see Hollyweird actors sue British tabloids for claims that would be laughed out of court if against a U.S. paper.
For similar British censorship, see last year’s refusal to name singer Elton John in reporting of a scandal allegedly involving his “husband” and a three-way orgy.
Fake News from assaults on Trump to hiding rapist pervs of Follywood.
Crunching the numbers as outpost did does give us a sharper look at the political money game as played by the conniving Clintons.
Harvey also gave a bundle to the nefarious tax-exempt Clinton Foundation and perhaps to offshoots of the Clintons tax-free entities.
Did Harvey's donations to the C/F go to "do-good projects"? Or did they make a circuitous route? Maybe landing back into the Clintons eternal political scams?
When Hollywood talks about ‘WOMEN'S RIGHTS’ they're not talking about equal pay or sexual harassment.
NOPE.
WHEN HOLLYWOOD TALKS ABOUT WOMEN'S RIGHTS AND WOMEN'S ‘HEALTH’ THEY'RE TALKING ABOUT ONE THING - AND ONLY ONE THING:
* * * * * * * * * * * A B O R T I O N * * * * * * * *
Hollywood wants to kill the ‘product’ of rape, irresponsible sex, tawdry affairs and sexual assault.
Period.
“But the BIG question is why are politicians so quiet?”
Because most of them, especially demonrats, are part of it. Look how many Hollysatan fund raisers they’ve had for their benefit? The abomination runs deep.
Huh????? Would a Deplorable get away with that without it being pointed out how bogus that answer is? The only way the answer would have any validity is if she said she was adding Weinstein's donations to that 10%.
Scoff......that’s not an answer....she was lying through her teeth, as usual.
Glen Gary Glen Ross?
Obama needs to explain he and the Mrs trotting their young daughter off to work for Harvey.
Obama's big donors are infamous Hollywood swordsmen, familiar w/ the winstein sex games.
All of them Democrats that go limp at the mention of "women's rights" and "abortion (gag) rights."
Obama knew all too well the sordid history of Harvey's assaulting young women.
“Kevin Spacey did uplifting videos. Surprised if this is about him.”
He’s been involved in some very good films. American Beauty, Midnight in the Garden of Good and Evil, Glen Gary Glen Ross, all excellent stuff.
He wouldn’t seem to be a very good target for a smear campaign since he’s been out of the closet for many years.
FWIW, I think I know who it is. The allegations have been around for a while. This is how the UK’s media outlets get around the extra protections for celebrities. The UK, sans constitution and with really squirrely libel and slander laws, makes it very difficult for the press to publish stories celebs/pols/powerful don’t want out, even if what’s being reported is accurate.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.