Two more women describe unwanted overtures by a Roy Moore at Alabama Mall

https://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/two-more-women-describe-unwanted-overtures-by-roy-moor ^ | November 15, 2017

[Fhios]

The Piranha effect. All a sudden every female that ever met Judge Roy are now creeped out.

So what, He wad 30-32 looking for a young wife. Let’s start arresting all the national politicians with younger trophy spouses.

[KavMan]

What man isn't? It's called mother nature. If this upsets anyone they need to take it up with the lord cause he designed us.

Younger girls meaning 15 - 17 when you're 30 lol

[caww]

I can top that.....Zimbabwa’s Pres. is 41 yrs ‘older’ than his wife!.....

[Kazan]

Gena Richardson says she was a high school senior working in the men’s department of Sears at the Gadsden Mall when a man approached her and introduced himself as Roy Moore.

If that is sexual harassment and unacceptable, the human race will ultimately become extinct.

[babble-on]

I think the stalking that culminated in a sexual assault later in the article is more the meat of the thing.

[Anima Mundi]

Twenty-six qualifies as a child for Obamacare if I recall correctly. It’s all relative maybe.

[montag813]

1977....AGAIN. Was Roy having ginseng and Spanish Fly with this Corn Flakes every morning? This is so pathetically fake.

[Mark17]

This charade is beyond RIDICULOUS. How many are lined up for tomorrow?

That was my first question too. They probably have 500 more women lined up, to say he groped them too. One might say, he saw me 500 yards away, but he groped me with his eyes. I know he did. How much more ridiculous will this get? I believe it will get worse, before it gets better.

[9422WMR]

“Twenty-six qualifies as a child for Obamacare”
Oh my god! I still laugh everytime I see that. Really, 26 is a child? They put that into a law with a straight face and no one laughed?
We are in bizzaro world now for sure.

[Mark17]

I can top that.....Zimbabwa’s Pres. is 41 yrs ‘older’ than his wife!.....

I won’t say a word, except that I live in a different culture. 😀😁😂🤗😱👍😆

[Nextrush]

The whole Republican Establishment infrastructure is being exposed, especially the fake “conservative media” in this high tech sodomizing of Roy Moore.

[patriotfury]

Don’t worry, the Washington Post probably has a few more compensated bird brains lined up from about 10 years ago, to trot out over the next few weeks.

They are not likely to actually pay them until AFTER the Alabama election. This is necessary to throw off pre election investigators.

The strategy IS NOT to actually substantiate anything, as they legally and factually cannot. The strategy IS strictly to influence the “court of public opinion” through creating a false preponderance (number) of unprovable allegations!

You know, one allegation PROVES another allegation!

There is a place for this, but there are many problems and politically motivated things going on here, 40 years after the fact, and while some of the most powerful allegations are truly crumbling.

Two weeks ago, (when the always politically correct Fox News weenie-brained-air-heads), were coming out and saying they would reserve judgement until more women came out, the people I was with all agreed, this strategy was precisely what would take place or be orchestrated.

When you do not want the facts, or cannot rely on the facts, because if they existed they may destroy your efforts and liberal/left wing agenda, (or they don’t exist), and you are forced to manufacture 40 year old allegations which can never be legally substantiated, the left wing strategy is left with ONLY ONE OPTION REMAINING, find a “number” of women willing to make carefully tailored allegations, AND trot them out strategically, in the weeks preceding the election!

There needs to be just enough women to keep the accused from possibly being able to investigate and respond to them, in the few weeks prior to the election!

I almost choked when a Fox attorney stated all they needed was more women to corroborate the allegations. This statement from a lawyer is amazing!

Nothing could be legally or lawfully further from the truth!

None of these women have even been deposed!

And it is not likely they will go there.

It goes without saying, they would be total dumbtard to be deposed, as they cannot prove something from 40 years ago, (and some of the allegations are already unravelling), and a deposition becomes a sworn legal document. This could really mess up their collective futures!

They cannot legally go after Roy Moore with simple 40 year old allegations, but he and his legal team can go after them for the destruction, hurt, and pain they are causing his family and the conservative voters of Alabama!

Yah, just put something unsubstantiated and unfactual in a deposition!

Nothing can or will be substantiated against Roy Moore, as we are now in a time when facts are not necessary for the desired conclusion and judgement in “THE COURT OF PUBLIC OPINION”!

The left wing effort only needs to survive until after the election!

This is precisely what the demonic RNC/DNC left wing efforts are aiming for.

The left wing and RINOs have been deliberately working to destroy moral boundaries and the family, across the US for a generation!

They could care less about these women!

They are just low down pawns.

Our left wing government needs a nation of immoral dependents, who no longer believe in God, no longer respect life, and are no longer loyal to the US or our Constitution!

This is why they are tryin to stop Roy Moore!

[SoFloFreeper]

Going to a mall and asking for a date is now a crime.

[wbarmy]

What is occurring is typical herd mentality.

If I do not agree with what “everybody” else is saying, then I will be left out. My name will not be in the paper, my friends will diss me, etc.

It has happened so many times in history, from small junior high and high school shenanigans, to Salem witch trials and the Wenatchee witch hunts.

After this is all over, all of these women will disappear and Judge Moore’s life will be in shambles.

[Yosemitest]

Here's an excerpt from Rush Limbaugh's Radio Show:

The Swamp Demands Conformity
Nov 15, 2017

...
RUSH: Here’s Mark in Port Townsend — where’s Port Townsend ?
Port Townsend what?

CALLER: That’s a little bit west of Seattle.

RUSH: In Washington.
Okay. Great to have you with us.
How you doing, sir ?

CALLER: I’m doing great, sir.
I hope you’re doing well yourself.

RUSH: I am under siege today, Mark.
I’m under siege.
The Drive-By Media is after me because I dared to point out that Roy Moore used to be a Democrat.

CALLER: That’s why you get paid the big bucks.
I’m envious of you.

RUSH: (laughing).

CALLER: So the comment I wanted to make was that as a retired law enforcement officer, Jeff Sessions —
I’m speaking as a retired law enforcement officer
— Jeff Sessions says he doesn’t see any reason to doubt these girls’ word.
Well, I see a really good reason.
None of these girls have been put under oath and made a sworn statement under penalty of perjury.
And Gloria Allred should be able to tell you
that is the first thing you do when you get a client,
you depose them and you get their statement on the record,
and then you go from there.
And if they’re not willing to make a sworn statement, that sounds really fishy to me.

RUSH: I take it you don’t believe the women
or you just don’t have enough information yet to make a determination ?

CALLER: You don’t have enough information to make a determination,
but speaking as an ex-cop, I find it fishy that nobody has made a sworn statement.
And about that yearbook thing,
you know, when I was in uniform at a certain time of year
you’d get kids walking up to you all the time wanting you to sign their yearbook.
“Hey, Officer Mark, sign my yearbook.”
And I was only a cop.
Can you imagine how politicians get kids wanting —
doesn’t mean you remember all of them.

RUSH: Hang on.
On the yearbook stuff, folks, for those of you who may not be up to speed on this —
and I doubt there are very many of you
— there are allegations that some of these autographs in yearbooks are forged.
There are conservative blog sites claiming to have evidence by virtue of side-by-side comparison
that somebody other than Judge Moore signed some of these things.
This is the first I’ve mentioned that.
I’m just reacting to you bringing up the yearbooks.

You’re upset with Jeff Sessions.
He’s the attorney general, and he is going ahead and acknowledging that
he believes witnesses before anybody’s been put under oath,
and you think that’s a little unprofessional, right ?

CALLER: It sounds to me like he’s just trying to tread carefully.

RUSH: Well, look, this is politics.
It has its own court, and it’s not a court of law.

CALLER: But these girls are making public statements —

RUSH: They are women.
They are women.

CALLER: Okay, they’re making public statements impugning somebody’s honor.
And somebody with responsibility needs to explain to them,
if you’re gonna besmirch somebody, you gotta put it on the record.

RUSH: No, you don’t.
Only in court.
And this is not in court.
This is in politics.

CALLER: I understand it’s politics,
but Gloria Allred should know what the law is.

RUSH: I’m sure she does.
That’s why she’s not in court and is instead on TV.

CALLER: I just want to make that point, Rush.
Thank you.

RUSH: I’m glad you called, Mark.
Folks, I have to tell you,
I’m having a little fun with this.
No, don’t misunderstand here,
but he’s exactly right, but of course that doesn’t —
there’s a whole different inertia and movement now that is taking place in the world of politics,
and there is no room for doubt.
I mean,
the guy did it, you don’t disbelieve the women.
I mean, that’s something you must subscribe to now.
The women don’t lie,
except if you’re Juanita Broaddrick,
then of course…
that’s the point.

BREAK TRANSCRIPT

RUSH: I was having fun with the caller and his obvious consternation
by confusing what happens in politics with what happens in the law,which is ironic,
because the laws are written by these people.
But what happens there
apparently the law doesn’t matter first and foremost.
Find it funny.

BREAK TRANSCRIPT

RUSH: Steve in Rochester, Minnesota.
Great to have you with us, sir.
How are you ?

CALLER: Hey, good.
Thanks, Rush. Dittos.
I’ve been listening since 1991.
So I was reading through a Fox News story on the various senators,
Republican senators and their comments about this whole situation,
and I read read ’em one after another; there were many.
And I was thinking as I got most of the way through it,
this sounds a lot like your media montages, vis-a-vis gravitas,
that I often hear on your show.
The similarities were striking in what they said.
And it was an observation that led me to think that
this is really a coordinated attack.
And I think that should be the focus, not the “he said, she said,”
but the fact that
this guy’s being attacked by the establishment, big time.

RUSH: Let me put it to you another way in the form of a question.
Interesting observation, by the way, that you,
in reading and listening to all of the different people opposing Judge Moore,
they’re all saying the same thing, is that your point ?
Just like when Cheney was mentioned as the potential vice presidential nominee for George W. Bush,
about 85 media people all said,
“That’s gravitas.
This is to provide gravitas.”
They all had that word.
You think the same thing’s happening here with the response to Judge Moore ?

CALLER: Yes.
Exactly.

RUSH: Okay.
So do you think —
let me just ask you point-blank
— do you think that, whether he did it or not, he’s being railroaded ?

CALLER: Yes.

RUSH: Interesting.

CALLER: Yep. I think this is a coordinated attack,
and what spurred me to think this
was your comments yesterday about Mitch McConnell attacking Bannon’s choice.
And I thought
how else could you do this ?
Here we are a month away from the election.

RUSH: Let me tell you something.
I don’t think there’s any doubt here.
When Bannon went public and said that
Judge Moore was the first of many candidates they’re gonna support
in order to oust the Republican leadership,
I don’t think there’s any question here that McConnell’s reacting to that.

Let me just ask you this.
Have any of you ever,
do you ever remember Mitch McConnell or the Republican leadership ever going after a Democrat
the way they’re going after — (interruption)
You don’t remember.
You don’t remember McConnell ever going after a Democrat the way they’re going after …

[Yosemitest]

Read this:

IT’S A FAKE!
Analyst Says Judge Roy Moore Signature Inside Gloria Allred Accuser’s Yearbook Was FORGED



The sevens in 1977 to the right of “Christmas,” are very different from the sevens in the date (12-22-77) above “Old Hickory House.”

“Look at the two versions of the number “7,” tweeted Wictor.

“”12-22-77” and “Olde Hickory House” were written by a different person,” he added.

Next, [Thomas] Wictor points out “the “R” and “y” in “Roy,”” are not written the same way.

The inflection of the “Y” is more pronounced in Moore’ signature as Chief Justice. The “R” is noticeably longer in the signature of Chief Justice, as well.

“During his legal career, Judge Moore became the first full-time Deputy District Attorney in Etowah County, Alabama, and served in this position from 1977 until 1982. In 1984, Judge Moore undertook private practice of law in Gadsden, Alabama,” states Moore’s bio on his campaign website.

“The accuser to this day calls him the District Attorney. He was NEVER District attorney. He was DEPUTY DA. DDA,” says Wictor. ... "

Check out this little fact from TheCipher

Interesting revelation about the signature in the yearbook and where it probably came from.
Turns out Moore was the judge who ruled against Nelson in her divorce case and the signature is exactly how it was on his ruling - explains the D.A. ( which Nelson has ).
Nelson also said she never had contact with him since the "incident"and failed to mention he was the judge in her divorce case.

Roy Moore Attorney Demands Gloria Allred Release Original Yearbook, Contends it’s a ‘Fraud’


" ... "D.A." (District Attorney) initials after Moore’s signature, was recognized by Moore as the initials that his then-assistant, Delver Adams , used to sign documents. ... "

From "TigerClaws" :

" ... But (exhibit 2) click on the image in the link.
You can clearly see two different color ink pens were used.

https://mobile.twitter.com/CNN/status/930205088299257859

Here's that image and a link to its ORIGINAL source :

And here’s one more source:

Live Stream: Moore Campaign Holding Press Conference

“ … Furthermore, after Moore's signature are the initials "D.A.," which Nelson and her attorney say represented were written by Moore because he was district attorney at the time.
But Moore was an assistant district attorney, Jauregui said,
And Moore can't recall ever signing his name with the letters "D.A." after it.
But he had seen it before, Jauregui said, when he was on the bench.

His assistant Delver Adams stamped his signature on papers and then put "D.A." on them, Jauregui said.
That's exactly how the signature appears on the divorce decree that Moore signed, he added. … ”

Here’s one more source:

Embattled GOP Senate candidate Roy Moore's attorney implies his signature in a girl's high school yearbook was a forgery

“ … "Judge Moore looked at that D.A. after that signature," Jauregui said. "No, he wasn't, he was the assistant district attorney."
He added that Moore's assistant when he was presiding over Nelson's divorce proceedings was named Delver Adams,
who typically stamped his initials on court filings. … ”

[silverleaf]

Man hits on 18 yr old women
Faces criminal charges...

Now theres a web that could snare most of the male population of the US

[Does so]

I had some exposure to document examination before I retired. It would take great skill to make such a close forgery free-hand. (Not that David Axelrod couldn't find someone to do it). The signature differences could be explained by the difference in passing years. (But they're still pretty close—a little TOO close—maybe a tracing?)

The difference in inks, however, could be readily disclosed through infra-red lighting. (And why Moore has asked for the original).

[Sacajaweau]

I posted on a couple threads...I do historical work and looking at/for signatures is part of it.

My take....Neither Beverly nor Gloria would likely be capable of the forgery...it's not as easy as you think. It was probably traced first in pencil either using a light table or another gizmo that casts the image unto the paper. Then ink was applied and the pencil erased. That may account for the "dirt" on the paper. Someone with a delicate touch can feel the erasure on the paper...but there would also be a minor change in the "glow" of the paper.

I also said there are three hands involved. The upper message...the signature and the printing.

I have 40 year old pens....even older....so don't be surprised with the ink outcome.

What would be sweet is if Moore still has the original stamp. Or....he can show us several documents using the stamp.

Back to the note....That was written by an aunt/uncle or close family friend....someone who knew her from when she was a little girl. I'm sure that person has left us.

Signature difference. When I was in college, my teacher said to beef up my signature...it was quite reserved...too reserved. You should see it now...50 years later...it's flamboyant and gorgeous. I passed on the teacher's tip to my granddaughter when she was young.

[Jim Noble]

Was Roy Moore into younger girls?

A normal variant.