Q drop #597 (FBI:first meeting of "secret society" on the night Trump won election)

qcodefag.github.io ^ | 1/23/2018 | Q Anon

[bagster]

Goodnight friend. Keep your chin up and keep reaching for the stars.

[JockoManning]

I don’t think any 4 or 8 chan stuff slipped through in that list of links I provided from Qx’s compilation. If they did, please let me know and I’ll alert a mod. The pedo link just describes the people involved, their connections etc. NOT per se the clear descriptions OF behaviors, that I can recall.

[Cboldt]

I think you're logic there is fine. If independent evidence surfaces that there was a secret anti-Trump meeting of 7 government players the night of election, then Q's credibility is pretty well burnished. At least for that post!

[madison10]

Awww. Maybe

[boxlunch]

Haha Ok! Thank you! That picure just flashed in my mind as a perfect representation in a funny way of this epic battle. Battle is anything but funny— but we all need a bit of levity and it is all just so weird when you think about it. Ok Ill put my white hat on and work on it! (tomorrow) 😊

[bagster]

Yay. Thank you. I was questioning myself. At this point, if there was in fact such a meeting. Lots of people know about, as confirmed by Senator Johnson to Brett Baire last night. If he knows about it, tons know about it. That truth is out there. And Q knew about it on November 14, six days after it took place. A pretty high level intelligence guy would only know that, right?

I contend that if he is confirmed on that ONE post. He is credible on ALL of them. Except the misinformation ones put out the the deep state, of course. The real Q is real in my book. I'm positive the meeting took place. But I will wait for confirmation before I go ALL in. I hold back one percent credibility factor.

[bagster]

You are most awesome!!!

[Becki]

I tend to agree. I've felt something was up since Rogers went to visit Trump after the election.

I am still researching and reading. I don't know why things are unfolding as they are, but I trust Trump to know what he is doing. It's why we elected him.

Things have been very wrong for a very long time. My third grandson was born Friday, and I want better things for them that what was planned.

[bagster]

Kind of shocking to see Petreaus’s name there.

Wow. Look at you. How wonderful for you.

If the Donald can kill the monster, we will be good for a time. We can get this country back on track. I hope, anyway.

[bagster]

http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/3625444/posts

text and email messages among FBI brass — reportedly discussed initiating physical harm to President Donald Trump.

W

T

F

[Cboldt]

Even people with firsthand knowledge aren't perfect, and if Q is "close to but not in" each action, there is even more risk of error.

My point is to not demand perfection in order to assign credibility.

I haven't followed Q at all, until maybe a day ago, and I'm just picking things up on the fly with no intention to research "all of it." I'm intrigued by it, but find the tidbits in the news (and Trump tweets) to have more "punch."

[bagster]

My point is to not demand perfection in order to assign credibility.

Oh no, I definitely don't do that. Ive only been on Q for a couple of weeks. I'm not fully up to date on the older stuff and don't know as much as some.

My thing is FR. There are way too many doubters here. I want something current I can point at to help convince fellow freepers. I think this is important and think we, as a site, should take what action we can in support, dissemination, and any other possible action we can do. As a unit. Like the Freepers of old did it.

To me, this is bigger than Bill Clinton's corruption. I believe the fate our nation is at stake. I would like FreeRepublic to be a part of the solution rather than a bunch of so called kooks vs non kooks and watch if all fall apart. I want to have it said of us that we played a roll in the saving of America.

That's how important this is to me.

You know?

[RoosterRedux]

Q is for Questioner...which is the Socratic Method.

[Cboldt]

I understand. Ben around the barn a few times (here too), and sometimes it is like herding cats.

Don't sweat the doubters or (sometimes this works the other direction) the zealots. Look for corroboration on your own, use your noodle, think independently, and share your reasoning. It's the best any of us can do.

[bagster]

Sound advice, goodman.

[9YearLurker]

Really that shouldn’t be at all a surprise by now.

The only surprise should be that they put it in writing on a retrievable platform.

That’s what somewhat boggles.

[Washi]

Q is no joke. He predicted The terrorist attack ithat later took place at Grand Central Station in New York City, prior to its occurrence, along with the nationality of the attacker.

When was Grand Central Station in New York City attacked by a terrorist?

[Washi]

I would like some solid to push in the face of the Q deniers.

I'd be more than happy to believe if there WERE something solid.

Why are you such a strong supporter in the absence of something solid?

[bagster]

Tell me about it. They thought they had the FBI and DOJ on lockdown and they could get the Donald before he got them.

Wrong.

[SaraJohnson]

Interesting! Is Snowdon getting an out for info he has on deep state?