Posted on 01/23/2018 7:24:23 PM PST by ransomnote
Hahahaha. Wouldn’t that be a hoot if after all this Hilbot ended up in a Russian prison. Reset THIS, bitch! Actually that is a pretty legit explanation for the Learn Russia line. Best I can come up with. Otherwise it makes not a lick of sense. Thank you for that brain candy, my fine friend.
Of course Clinton would be in that list.
The magic negro as well.
I thought she went full ghetto-ninja, then they caught her with a large butterfly net, rolled her in an oriental rug, flopped her into Scooby, and hauled her off to a rubber room to cool down.
She nearly ended up in an Iranian Day-Spa few years ago after a plane crash but that didn’t dent her vicious attitude, so..
:)
Hmmmm...Russian prison or Iranian burka in a tent in the desert. Both appeal to me.
Oh, no, the Iranians realized who they had in the ambulance and immediately called to have her medivac’d somewhere, ANYWHERE, out of their country. They’re evil, but not stupid.
Hahaha...You’re right. When negotiating for hostages, they paid Obama to take her back. 4 billion in cash delivered on pallets in the dead of night. With Hillary in a box.
I believe Q is for “Q Clearance” which is the name Q first posted under. Q Clearance is described in this wikipedia excerpt:
“A Q Clearance (or Q-type clearance) is a United States Department of Energy (DOE) security clearance that is roughly comparable to a United States Department of Defense Top Secret clearance with Sensitive Compartmentalized Information Access (TS-SCI). It is the most permissive clearance granted by the United States Government, acting as the sole means of access to the vast compartmentalizations Top Secret and Secret Restricted Data, and DOE “security” areas.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Q_clearance
But I agree that Q uses the Socratic method. Some noted earlier that Trump uses that method as well.
A FReeper wrote a wonderful article about the Socratic method. I tried to save it. Bagster, do you remember who that was?
It mighta been ReformedLiberal. That chick is a genius. She must have a place in your cabinet.
https://www.scribd.com/user/869063/Jerome-Corsi/uploads
No way. It's totally fun. If you're a dude, you can be Jason Bourne. If you're a chick I think you should be...hmmmm...Moneypenny? No, too sedate and sexist. How bout Angelina Jolie in "Wanted" a highly skilled assassin with big puffy lips and tattoos. Eh?
I’m more like Jessica Fletcher. LOL Yeah, I know murder mysteries, not spying, but you get the idea.
Well there you have it. You can be the detective sleuthing out whats going on. Sorta a female James Ryan from Clancy. But you don’t have to go in the field and rescue rogue Russian subs.
I seem to remember that George Soros is wanted in Russia. Not sure for what. Probably the usual. Don’t think he would risk going there - even for her.
On the other hand, my first impression of Q was that he was either Trump himself or someone speaking for Trump (after being cleared by someone in the WH with knowledge of what can and cannot be said from an intel POV). It is also possible that Q is a fraud, but I don't believe that is the case.
Not only does Q seem to be speaking with deep knowledge of the goings on inside the WH, he speaks in a style very similar to that of Trump.
Trump speaks in an elliptical fashion often leaving off words at the end of a sentence and Q speaks similarly but in a cryptic fashion...as if slightly edited by someone with intel experience.
As to the Socratic Method, Trump has always operated with that basic means of obtaining information.
As a former NYer, I have been able to watch Trump daily (he is as much a fixture of NY life as the NY Times or the Post...everyone knows Trump's style).
Speaking of the Socratic Method, Socrates said (and I paraphrase) that he was the wisest man in Greece in his time not because he was smart but because he knew the depth of his ignorance.
Most clever business people use that method of operating. It takes a certain amount of confidence to ask questions as though you know nothing. But such a technique not only gets to the bottom line, but it also disarms the person who you are questioning (Colombo, the detective, used this technique brilliantly).
Furthermore, such a technique reveals the competence or lack thereof of the person you are questioning.
I think this is one of the reasons Trump is such a good judge of profession competence.
You can also see this technique reflected in comments about Trump.
"He is a very fast learner." (Starting from a position of "ignorance" would enhance that assessment.)
"He asks very good questions."
This might also be the reason Trump is underestimated so often.
As a retired businessman, I have had a habit of using this technique to get information for many years. It works quite well.
And folks often think you are ignorant until you begin to dig into the meat of a subject.
I read that comment and it was indeed wonderful. I think the author was Freeper ReformedLiberal.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.