Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

This Boat is Impossible to Capsize
www.popularmechanics.com ^ | Feb 18, 2018 204 | By Sophie Weiner

Posted on 02/20/2018 10:43:53 AM PST by Red Badger

The Thunder Child is a high speed, wave-piercing boat that's built to be uncapsizable. The boat was designed by Safehaven Marine for use by Navy, law enforcement, and other groups who sail in high-pressure situations. The boat can fit 10 crew members on board and has a sleeping cabin. It's built to absorb shocks from rough seas.

But by far the most impressive thing about the Thunder Child is its ability to right itself even if it is completely capsized. The video below explains how.

There are a few factors that allow this boat to sail through any conditions without permanently capsizing. First, it has a very low center of gravity. Second, the cabin itself is watertight, so if the boat does flip over, water won't rush in. And lastly, the cabin is built to be extremely buoyant, so if the boat does end up upside down, it will naturally right itself. In the video, a crane pulls the boat 180 degrees and allows it to self-right. This is pretty exciting to watch along with the people inside the boat--you can't help but hold your breath and hope it really does what it's supposed to do. It does right itself, easily.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Outdoors; Sports; Travel
KEYWORDS: boat; ocean; ship; water
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last
To: JewishRighter

“pretty cool, but in todays navy, does it have self repairing engines?”

...and collision avoidance redundancies?

No but they come with tissues to wipe their tears


21 posted on 02/20/2018 11:03:22 AM PST by al baby (May the Forceps be with you Hi Mom Its a Joke friends)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: PJBankard

Agreed. As somebody who spent much of a career proving convincingly on the ground to customers that things will work in space the way they are supposed to work, I’m very sensitive to test design and documentation being crucial parts of the exercise.


22 posted on 02/20/2018 11:03:39 AM PST by SFConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

23 posted on 02/20/2018 11:04:53 AM PST by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jerod
Well, they're both built in Ireland. But beyond that there's not a lot in common.

The narration implies that if the cabin seal breaks this boat would flood and sink like any other if it capsizes. The video from inside, with passengers strapped to their seats, did look like a thrilling ride.

24 posted on 02/20/2018 11:04:53 AM PST by katana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: grobdriver

I was wondering the same thing. It sure looks like some out-of-shot device (aka a crane) is giving a little “yank” on that cable at the start of the video.


25 posted on 02/20/2018 11:05:01 AM PST by WayneS (An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last. - Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: jerod

Another word or three ... cabin door seals!


26 posted on 02/20/2018 11:06:21 AM PST by Pearls Before Swine (We)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

I’ll bet old Quint, Brody and Hooper wished they’d had one of these babies.


27 posted on 02/20/2018 11:06:42 AM PST by RandallFlagg (Vote for your guns!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IronJack

Correct.

“If you’re outside when the storm starts, you’re STAYING outside!”


28 posted on 02/20/2018 11:07:14 AM PST by WayneS (An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last. - Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: RandallFlagg

Gonna need a BIGGER SHARK!................


29 posted on 02/20/2018 11:07:40 AM PST by Red Badger (Wanna surprise? Google your own name. Wanna have fun? Google your friends names......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
Geeesh, I don't know where to start. First, it may not stay capsized but hours constantly upside down then back again will probably drown the crew below decks, NOTHING stays watertight, NOTHING.

They rolled the boat in a nice calm harbor, try that in 20 ft sustained seas for 12 hours, or like I did, a full week on a USCG 95' patrol boat in 12-15' seas. I can appreciate their effort but overconfidence in your boat will make you take chances that you shouldn't.

30 posted on 02/20/2018 11:08:52 AM PST by New Perspective (Proud father of a son with Down Syndrome and fighting to keep him off Obama's death panels.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

31 posted on 02/20/2018 11:09:42 AM PST by Red Badger (Wanna surprise? Google your own name. Wanna have fun? Google your friends names......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Technically that capsized, it just also uncapsized. Small comfort if you were on the boat at the start, because you probably won’t be at the end. Also I question naming a boat after the one in War of the Worlds.


32 posted on 02/20/2018 11:11:07 AM PST by discostu (Lick here [ ] you might be one of the lucky 25.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: relictele
And does it have service women who fall pregnant within 2 months of deployment?

If it capsizes I'm sure they'll fall on a lot of things, but landing directly on a penis would be a bit of a crap shoot.

33 posted on 02/20/2018 11:15:41 AM PST by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

meh.... Capsizing is a pretty low risk.. I’ll keep what I have for the comfortable space and ride.. Albemarle 32EX


34 posted on 02/20/2018 11:16:55 AM PST by Damifino (The true measure of a man is found in what he would do if he knew no one would ever find out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim 0216

It was not. The ship did not have watertight bulkheads up to the main deck. The design flaw was corrected in the two sister ships. I believe the evidence suggests that the Titanic still would have sunk with water tight bulkheads but it would have taken many more hours.


35 posted on 02/20/2018 11:17:03 AM PST by Maine Mariner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

36 posted on 02/20/2018 11:19:28 AM PST by Jim W N
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

can the self-righting mechanism be applied to people too? wouldnt that be useful.


37 posted on 02/20/2018 11:20:28 AM PST by thinkliberty64
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maine Mariner

Thanks but it was a tongue-in-cheek comment on my part. I thought it was kind of obvious the cabin wasn’t watertight.


38 posted on 02/20/2018 11:23:59 AM PST by Jim W N
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: dblshot

Late ‘80’s or early 90’s, right? I remember the tests in New Orleans East. The boat yard had trouble getting the Coast Guard to certify test completion because they could never keep it inverted long enough to officially declare the test had started.


39 posted on 02/20/2018 11:26:40 AM PST by Pecos (Better the one you have with you than the one you left at home.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Something about an unsinkable ship and an iceberg comes to mind.


40 posted on 02/20/2018 11:33:33 AM PST by rdl6989
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson