Q Anon: (5/21/18) FRiendly Freeper Collaboration

qanon.pub ^ | 5/21/2018 | FReepers, vanity

[ransomnote]

This thread is a friendly collaborative place for FReepers to analyze information and share opinons. FReepers have a wide variety of reasons for investigating Q Anon content; this is not the appropriate place to criticize or badger those who choose to use some of their time in this manner.

If you are new to Q Anon, the three links below provide overviews to help answer the questions, "Who is Q?" and "Why read Q drops?".

Is Trump Staging a Counter-Coup? [Q explained?]>
Note: The above thread has been locked for disruptive comments, but post #1 includes a strong, concise Who/What/Where overview.

Q Anon: A Freeper's post re the "new Parallel Construct that Trump has created"

First post to “Q” ping list. Please read and let me know if you want off or on it

You can locate Q Anon threads by searching the key word "Qanon" using the search window in the upper right of Free Republic's forum page.

If you haven't seen it yet, President John F. Kennedy's excellent speech regarding secret societies, as well as comments about the press, is located at the following link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zdMbmdFOvTs

A helpful FReeper passed along the following Youtube link to a good source for concise reviewes of Q drops, Praying Medic:
https://www.youtube.com/user/prayingmedic/videos

Praying Medic also has a a Twitter account:
https://anonsw.github.io/qtmerge

Q "drops" (i.e., posts) can be read with their original formatting on various websites. Sometimes the Q drop websites come under cyber attack or stop updating. This week, I've been using the following link:
https://qanon.pub

Q drops (i.e., posts) often use unfamiliar acronyms. Swordmaker maintains a list of acronymsto help FReepers understand Q drop text. The master list of acronyms is stored on Swordmaker's profile page. It's really great to have a convenient place to find definitions and explanations of terms used in the drops. Here is the link:
http://www.freerepublic.com/~swordmaker/index

Within our threads, Swordmaker posts updates featuring the latest terms added to the lexicon - you can find his updates on threads by looking for this silver Q graphic:

SkyPilot has been collecting Q Anon information into one interesting, detailed, "story of Q" post which I'll place here:
https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3633313/posts?page=163#163

Here's a handy link for those who would like to read what people on Twitter are Tweeting about Q Anon:
Click to read what Tweeters are saying about Q Anon

For those who want a little uplifting video which outlines the big picture that we are now striving for, here's a video from 2016 in which candidate Donald Trump outlines what he wants for Americans and America and his promises if elected.
This Video Will Get Donald Trump Elected

If you'd like to communicate your support for President Trump's efforts to "red-pill" Americans, you may want to use the link Hoosiermama posted which provides you with and email page - you can send the president an email. Here's the link:
Email support for President Trump

[corlorde]

It all centers around this meeting. Rosenstein won't be there, but his associate deputy will be. Hence “the recusal” but not really. More about optics, in my view

WH Brokers, But Will Not Attend, Meeting About Secret Russia Probe Documents

Key congressional leaders are set to meet Thursday with federal law enforcement and intelligence bosses amid a slow-motion standoff over secret documents in the Russia investigation, the White House said on Tuesday

snip

Those scheduled to attend from the executive branch are Director of National Intelligence Dan Coats, FBI Director Christopher Wray and Principal Associate Deputy Attorney General Ed O’Callaghan, Sanders said.

https://www.npr.org/2018/05/22/613359004/trump-gop-prepare-new-pincer-attack-against-justice-department-and-the-fbi

[TEXOKIE]

I’m curious about the [s] in the word “Attack[s]

Going from multiples to single attack? narrowing attack?

[bagster]

Therefore Solicitor General Noel Francisco would replace Rosenstein."

Okay, where'e this knucklhead come from? First time I've heard his name in this.

Also, if Rosensteisn merely recuses himself, then the number three at DOJ takes over his authority in the recused matters. If he is "forcibly terminated" then his position must be filled, but I assume then the "acting" appointment or full appointment comes into play. Either way, number three at DOJ is key.

Is this Callahan now the number three?

Bagster

Lesser Oracle

[bagster]

I think he's talking about attacks from without (deep state) and within (Corsi/Alex Jones types) who are allegedly on "our" side.

Bagster

Lesser Oracle

[TEXOKIE]

I think what little jeremiah is saying is that something has changed with the way the aggregator qanon.pub is posting the drops with html, which causes formatting issues when we try to cut and paste from their site to this one.

We used to be able to cut and paste directly. Now we have to deal with cleaning up format.

[Pain] in the behind!

[corlorde]

I’m not sure where the word recusal originated from for this meeting. I think the White House set the parameters for it (who should attend), but I could be mistaken. But after the meeting, it will be interesting to see what happens with Rosenstein... to see if the word “recusal” comes up for anything else, and to see what the DOJ does when the IG report goes public. Or starts to leak. Supposedly, it isn’t good for the FBI; The lead swamp monster in need of a complete drain.

[bagster]

Oh, mark my word, corlorde, this will not be a symbolic recusal. Rosenstein is out, whether he remains employed but recused and replaced in the matters at hand, or is totally separated from service in the DOJ, I'm thinking that deal was made yesterday and we are just waiting for the officially approved mainstream media confirmation.

He will not be at the meeting because they don't want him to peruse the evidence (dirty) they have on him that requires his removal, though of course the Donald most likely showed/told him about it yesterday in front of Wray and Sessions.

Make no mistake. Rosenstein is gutted.

Bank it.

Bagster

Lesser Oracle

[Yulee]

“It has nothing to do with “recusal”
****
Correct. Rosenstein will not be in the meeting. O’Callaghan will. Rosenstein has not recused himself from his involvement with Mueller. Both he and Mueller should recuse themselves, and Mueller should shut down Russiagate.

[Lonely Bull]

What is the DSM?

I won't be looking right now for the reference, but the term started getting used in one of these threads a few days ago for "Deep State media."

[slag]

‘join John McCain’s presidential campaign’

That don’t sound good.

[xone]

Rosenstein terminated 24 May.

Current #3 is Pannuncio but he replaced Brand so his 210 day exemption is over. Not eligible for Rosenstein Place.

Rosentstein/Pannuncio out

The solicitor General Francisco (who Trump picked) in @ #2

Sessions and Trump pick #3

[txhurl]

It would appear Big Ed has our CINC’s confidence. I *have* heard this Francisco cat’s name around. [Ed] is puzzling tho.

[bagster]

The solicitor General Francisco (who Trump picked) in @ #2

So this guy will be the new Rosenstein?

Why all the hub-bub about number 3 then?

Bagster

Lesser Oracle

[TEXOKIE]

BZF/RDD are the three letter identifiers for those airstrips.

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Thanks!

[Shady]

I’m off this week, away from the Twilight Zone, but just up on the Mountain at the Lake, from here we can see a lot! 😁

[corlorde]

What a mess.

[TheBigJ]

Good explanations on that thread

[HoneysuckleTN]

Maybe he spelled Callahan like Dirty Harry Callahan to send a message to the Deepies.

As good an idea as any, without more to go on.

[Shady]

O’Halloran. Acting...Deputy...AG. Intermission is over, time for the climax!

[TEXOKIE]

Amen, BABY! Intriguing what all was in play with media sculduggery in the 60’s, but aren’t you spot on about the seeds of socialism stirring prior to that and WW II.

PS: 1964 took out the Catholic Church in Vatican II, as well, seeded also with nefarious actors. That vandalism of the Church is on display today.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

And the Protestants were invaded by World Council of Churches and National Council of Churches

Full Pronged Attack[s]