Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. Navy Divers Tasked to Investigate Claims
self | 6/10/2019 | Ken Regis

Posted on 06/10/2018 4:57:42 AM PDT by Ken Regis

U.S. Navy Divers Tasked to Investigate Claims

By Ken Regis

The U.S. Navy was summoned to nearby Badluck Lake, Wisconsin to investigate claims made by several residents of Armbegone, a fishing village with a population of 850 permanent residents.

“We learned that an extraordinary number of local residents had similar experiences at the lake and we wanted to confirm their accounts and, at a minimum, recover their property” said Master Chief Petty Officer and Master Diver, Gil Abel who is stationed at the U.S. Navy’s facility in Great Lakes, Illinois.


Navy divers search in vain for lost weapons

After diligently searching the bottom of Badluck Lake for 5 days, the mission ended. Nothing was found. “We expected to get a bunch of weapons from the bottom of the lake, but we didn’t find one!” said Abel.

The DOD was called to conduct the search after passage of the controversial Gun Registration Act of 2019. The new law makes it a crime to own a gun without a federally issued license and directs the Attorney General to maintain a database of every privately-owned weapon in the Nation. After Attorney General Sessions recused himself from the process because he claimed he had seen a “rifle or something in a Walmart once”, Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein assumed the responsibility for enforcing the new law.

Armbegone was the DOJ’s pilot program according to Rosenstein, “Everybody in the town has similar stories. They were on the lake, the rowboat rocked, and their weapon went down to ‘Davey Jones’ locker.”

“We’re thinking about moving our pilot enforcement program to another place” says Rosenstein.


TOPICS: Humor; Local News
KEYWORDS: a2; guns
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-22 last
To: MosesKnows
I know it's a hard concept for some... simply put, what that decision says that only laws passed that reinforce the Constitution are valid.

Since your not smart enough for simple concepts, I will try to help you (not thinking that your abilities are up to speed, but here we go)

Dredd Scott was a law that was passed and courts allowed it to stand for a number of years? Your argument that the courts are so great belies your understanding.

Stick to simple things how do they get toothpaste in the tube.

21 posted on 06/13/2018 6:35:08 PM PDT by SERE_DOC ( The beauty of the Second Amendment is that it will not be needed until they try to take it. T)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: SERE_DOC
I will repeat the lesson.

a law repugnant to the Constitution is void

A law repugnant to the Constitution is NOT void until a court finds it in conflict with the Constitution.

If you would spend as much time informing yourself as you do trying to be clever you may one day have something important to share.

22 posted on 06/14/2018 1:42:41 PM PDT by MosesKnows (Love Many, Trust Few, and Always Paddle Your Own Canoe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-22 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson