|
Posted on 01/03/2020 1:19:57 PM PST by ransomnote
Q is the result of the sacrifices and commitment of countless patriots to win back our captured country from the Deep State and achieve the transformation President Trump promised in this campaign video. President Trump has said the awakening of the public is key to this transformation.
Q describes this awakening as follows:
"The Great Awakening ('Freedom of Thought’), was designed and created not only as a backchannel to the public (away from the longstanding ‘mind’ control of the corrupt & heavily biased media) to endure future events through transparency and regeneration of individual thought (breaking the chains of ‘group-think’), but, more importantly, aid in the construction of a vehicle (a ‘ship’) that provides the scattered (‘free thinkers’) with a ‘starter’ new social-networking platform which allows for freedom of thought, expression, and patriotism or national pride (the feeling of love, devotion and sense of attachment to a homeland and alliance with other citizens who share the same sentiment).
When ‘non-dogmatic’ information becomes FREE & TRANSPARENT it becomes a threat to those who attempt to control the narrative and/or the stable.
When you are awake, you stand on the outside of the stable (‘group-think’ collective), and have ‘free thought’.
"Free thought" is a philosophical viewpoint which holds that positions regarding truth should be formed on the basis of logic, reason, and empiricism, rather than authority, tradition, revelation, or dogma.
When you are awake, you are able to clearly see.
The choice is yours, and yours alone.
Trust and put faith in yourself.
You are not alone and you are not in the minority.
Difficult truths will soon see the light of day.
WWG1WGA!!!" ~ Q (#3038)
We discuss Q drop content on our threads to learn the truth about the capture of our country, after a lifetime of reading, watching and listening to lies and distortions used to control us and tame the American spirit. The truth shall set us free.
For summaries of Q drops (i.e., posts) discussed on our threads, I invite you to read the latest editions of The Oracle, which include helpful links and quotes to explain Q drop content.
Q drops can be found here in their original format.
Links to our Q threads, and Q drops posted on our threads, are listed in this table.
The video, Qanon is 100% coming from the Trump Administration, is just one of many excellent responses to the all-important question, "Whom does Q serve?" Another excellent source for identifying Q's involvement with President Trump is found at the website titled Qproofs.com.
Q Boot Camp is a quick, condensed way to learn the background and basics about the Q movement.
Q has reminded us repeatedly that together, we are strong. As the false "narrative" is destroyed and the divisive machinery put in place by the Deep State fails, the fact that patriotism has no skin color or political party is exposed for all to see.
In the battle between Good and Evil, we can't afford to let false divisions separate us any longer. The changes heading our way and the information revealed will, at times, be very difficult to face, but we will face it together. We, and our country, will be forever made stronger for having reclaimed the truth and freedom of thought.
Where We Go 1, We Go All
Note: Links in the post above are included in a resource table linked in Post #2 below, along with many additional excellent links to the best Q analysts and informations sources we've identified.
Interesting. This is from one of the comments:
... The golden globes producers preapproved his jokes and script teleprompter and camera shots of certain known pedos and Obuma Medal of freedom receivers. This was a controlled red pill! White hats are fully in control! #WWG1GWA #GoldenGlobes #hanx
Thank you very much for the details, all coming back to me know. It’s not a moot point, unknown, or murky.
Very smart observation and speculation on your part.
mark
bkmk
A little off topic, but - Is there a more worthless tool out there than ‘media watchdog’ Howie Kurtz? What a joke. Talk about the wolves guarding the hen house. Sheesh.
Think for yourself is the instruction from Q.
Until you do.
if that number changes, I’ll let you know
I have worried for years that terrorists would figure out they could wreak havoc with a score or more individuals starting wildland fires. You can hike completely out of sight in minutes in many places, drop a delayed fuse (simple to make, obviously) and be gone before it ignites.
I wonder how they caught these terrible people and I hope they throw the book at them.
Thank you, I wonder where they got “almost 200” from.
It is beyond tragic.
Jihadi online magazines already gave instructions to terrorists to start fires in the US, with details. Many of California’s horrible fires have been arson over the years.
mark
That’s been my thinking but I’ve never heard of any being caught at it.
“About 85 per cent are related to human activity, 13 per cent confirmed arson and 37 per cent suspected arson,” he said. “The remainder are usually due to reckless fire lighting or even just children playing with fire.”
...because it includes everyone cautioned for, for example, throwing a cigarette out of a car window (yes, there are idiots who still do that) and children lighting grass fires that are quickly extinguished. What surprises me is that in search of a headline, that site didn't mention that ISIS had been telling its followers, before Christmas, to light fires in Australia. Now I'll have to find the source for that...but while I do, here's the updated list of fires and warnings for the entire State, it shows that the Queensland volunteers are heading towards NSW in the South to help with the fires there...
Found the original article, I only heard about this in December, but the date of the article is in 2008.
Islam group urges forest fire jihad
By Josh Gordon
September 7, 2008 — 6.03pm
AUSTRALIA has been singled out as a target for “forest jihad” by a group of Islamic extremists urging Muslims to deliberately light bushfires as a weapon of terror.
US intelligence channels earlier this year identified a website calling on Muslims in Australia, the US, Europe and Russia to “start forest fires”, claiming “scholars have justified chopping down and burning the infidels’ forests when they do the same to our lands”.
The website, posted by a group called the Al-Ikhlas Islamic Network, argues in Arabic that lighting fires is an effective form of terrorism justified in Islamic law under the “eye for an eye” doctrine.
The posting — which instructs jihadis to remember “forest jihad” in summer months — says fires cause economic damage and pollution, tie up security agencies and can take months to extinguish so that “this terror will haunt them for an extended period of time”.
“Imagine if, after all the losses caused by such an event, a jihadist organisation were to claim responsibility for the forest fires,” the website says. “You can hardly begin to imagine the level of fear that would take hold of people in the United States, in Europe, in Russia and in Australia.”
With the nation heading into another hot, dry summer, Australian intelligence agencies are treating the possibility that bushfires could be used as a weapon of terrorism as a serious concern.
Attorney-General Robert McClelland said the Federal Government remained “vigilant against such threats”, warning that anyone caught lighting a fire as a weapon of terror would feel the wrath of anti-terror laws.
“Any information that suggests a threat to Australia’s interests is investigated by relevant agencies as appropriate,” Mr McClelland said.
Adam Dolnik, director of research at the University of Wollongong’s Centre for Transnational Crime Prevention, said that bushfires (unlike suicide bombing) were generally not considered a glorious type of attack by jihadis, in keeping with a recent decline in the sophistication of terrorist operations.
“With attacks like bushfires, yes, it would be easy. It would be very damaging and we do see a decreasing sophistication as a part of terrorist attacks,” Dr Dolnik said.
“In recent years, there have been quite a few attacks averted and it has become more and more difficult for groups to do something effective.”
Dr Dolnik said he had observed an increase in traffic on jihadi websites calling for a simplification of terrorist attacks because the more complex operations had been failing. But starting bushfires was still often regarded as less effective than other operations because governments could easily deny terrorism as the cause.
The internet posting by the little-known group claimed the idea of forest fires had been attributed to imprisoned Al Qaeda leader Abu Musab Al-Suri. It said Al-Suri had urged terrorists to use sulphuric acid and petrol to start forest fires.
POTUS says it’s known that Iraq was not behind 9/11.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/ENkY7a2UwAMf3JO?format=png&name=small
~~~~~~~~~~~
boom?
~~~~~~~~~~
I wondered why DJT tweeted this at this crazy time - maybe he is going to drop some info about the huge amounts of money that was spent for no damn reason other than to fill the DS’s coffers...
A natural born citizen can’t be anything else.
***********************************************************************************************
Right, which is why I object to the concept that NBC should include dual citizenship.
______________________________________________________________________
What Congress can give by passing a law, Congress can take away by passing another law. Congress doesn’t “give” natural born citizenship. A natural born citizen can’t be anything else. Only God can take that away. Any other combination of parents or location are up for grabs (in the hands of Congress)
But, if the Constitution is a “living, breathing” document, words don’t mean anything anyway.
***********************************************************************************
In general I agree with what you wrote. However, I don’t believe that Congress has the power to define the term—they are in charge of immigration/naturalization process which doesn’t apply to NBC.
Therefore, the definition would have to be a constitutional amendment. That may start in Congress if 2/3 agree, but then the states would have to ratify it.
In this scenario, Congress is not “giving” anything—just documenting the definition of NBC for the record—the way it is supposed to be done instead of by activist judges legislating from the bench or by defacto changing requirements by lying/ignoring reality.
Basically we are in agreement on the broad strokes.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
