Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: BluesDuke
Thanks Blues. I could never understand all this crap. Now I, at least, have a clue.

Have you got a guesstimate as to how long this strike might last? Are we gonna miss another WS?

4 posted on 08/17/2002 7:05:22 AM PDT by Dawgsquat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Dawgsquat
Here is an article from todays Dallas Morning News, expressing Hick's opinions. Don't laugh at the irony of the article.



http://www.dallasnews.com/sports/topstories/stories/081702dnspohickslede.247d8.html

By KEN DALEY / The Dallas Morning News


Rangers owner Tom Hicks said Friday that if baseball players carry out their threat to walk off the job Aug. 30, the strike will be a long one. In fact, he will insist on it.

"I think a majority of owners, including me, would probably like to have even stronger cost-containment than we're talking about right now," Hicks said from a yacht off the coast of San Diego. "If they do choose to go on strike, I'm confident ownership will not allow a repeat of 1994. We need to fix baseball and not just have another Band-Aid solution."

Hicks said he fully expected the union to set its strike date Friday, calling the postponement of the decision earlier in the week "a maneuver for the benefit of public relations and not substance." And while Hicks said he is optimistic a settlement can be reached before the strike date, he will urge fellow owners to make a work stoppage count if it occurs.

"For the good of baseball, we need to have cost-containment and competitive balance," Hicks said. "People know a strike wouldn't be good for the game, but what is worse is to put our fans through this every seven years. I think a lot of owners would have a preference for a hard salary cap like football has. That would probably be better for baseball, but that's not what we're negotiating this time."

What owners are seeking, in addition to increased revenue-sharing, is a payroll tax of 50 percent for teams exceeding $102 million in payroll. The Rangers opened the season with a $105 million payroll, which ranked third in the majors, but Hicks promised he would comply with the proposed tax threshold.

"Every team in baseball that has any kind of business sense would try to manage its payroll to stay under that tax threshold," Hicks said. "There might be one or two that wouldn't, but that's a decision those teams have to make. Certainly, I can assure you, the Texas Rangers wouldn't be among them. If this system is implemented, the Texas Rangers will be under the threshold."

With the Rangers mired in last place and on pace to lose 93 games, attendance at The Ballpark in Arlington already was down 343,287 from last year through 60 dates. That 16 percent drop could worsen if the strike threat angers fans, and Hicks said he would understand.

"I think [fans] should be concerned; I don't blame them," he said. "This is a tactic. If we get an agreement between now and the 30th, that's terrific. If not, it will set off a chain of events that won't be good for anybody.

"If it happens, I just hope we as owners make sure we fix baseball for good. And I'm confident we would. I think it would be very different from 1994."

But not all owners might be able to withstand a shutdown as long as Hicks. Mike Ozanian, the senior editor who compiles the annual franchise valuations for Forbes magazine said, "The players have already been paid for almost all of this season. However, the owners stand to lose more than $1 billion from TV and ticket sales if a strike forces the cancellation of the postseason. Teams cannot afford such losses because many owners already have too much debt. And their personal businesses have been suffering as a result of the weak economy and beaten-down stock market."



The last paragraph says it all in my opinion.

5 posted on 08/17/2002 7:37:05 AM PDT by dtel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Dawgsquat
Have you got a guesstimate as to how long this strike might last? Are we gonna miss another WS?

Assuming that there will be a strike at all (remember: setting the date does not for once and for all commit you to keeping the date if you think negotiations are improved enough, from the day you set the date to the day of the date, that you feel confident a deal is just a short while away without a strike), a strike could last any length of time. But I suspect that, if former Commissioner Fay Vincent can be believed, a strike this time would not last long enough to put the postseason into a cryonic chamber - because of yet another of the owners' self-possession blunders:

The day the players go out on strike, the banks will give baseball one week to make a deal. And Don (Fehr) knows it. He has all the cards. - Fay Vincent, to the Washington Post, earlier this season.

Now, of course, it is sensible to ask why the hell, if Bug Selig and those of his fellow owners so bleating are so convinced baseball is worse than dead flat broke (which is, I think, proven well enough to be a lie in the first place), those owners who did borrowed up the patootie and beyond in the first place? But it might first be sensible to remind ourselves that baseball owners have and exercise the kind of sensibility that would make them excellent political office candidates if they so desired...
14 posted on 08/18/2002 4:39:42 PM PDT by BluesDuke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson