Posted on 12/30/2002 7:35:00 AM PST by JameRetief
Yeah, the Eagles nailed that song, IMHO, as a tune about Lib'rals disillusionment upon realizing that the Socialist Utopia they sought is an abysmal failure and impossible dream. Thanks fer reminding me that I need to complete the FReeped version.
FReegards...MUD
Nonsense. That God is able to turn even evil to eventual good does not make it any less evil.
Judas' betrayal of Christ led directly to the salvation of mankind, in Christian theology. That good came from it does not detract from its status as the most evil act in history.
What Tolkien is talking about here is that Evil will be ultimately defeated by Good. Not that Evil doesn't exist.
If Evil were able to ultimately defeat the original intentions of God, then it would be more powerful than Him.
And I believe he still shall be prosecuted.
"My only point is that Lord knows -- and I mean that literally -- why he hasn't been. Lord knows."
Perhaps part of the reason was what happened on November 5, 2002, and what shall happen in November 2004, IMHO. The unsatiated LustFerJustice vis a vis Der SchleekMeister and his feckless minions has given a certain number of Americans the desire--an almost divine inspiration--to strike out against the VileLeftists in alternate venues. Would the dissolution of the DemonRAT Party have been as hasty as it has been if Slick had've RESIGNED like he shouldda 4-6 years ago?! Probably not.
"So that was a limited point -- that God's not all about making sure everything's perfect on Earth -- that's not his Plan. We are fallen and evil abides here. He wants us to try to prosper and be happy, of course."
Bringing Clinton to Justice will NOT make life on Earth perfect...we all know that. Still, Clinton is an inarguable EVIL and for America to sit on our arses and pretend that 800-pound jackass ain't really sittin' there waitin' to be SLAUGHTERED is unthinkable to me. You recently summarized my opinion on this issue rather well on another thread, so I want you to understand this clearly...Bringing Clinton to Justice is not really about Clinton receiving what's coming to him at this point, IMHO. Bringing Clinton to Justice is what is required of America--and each individual American--as a whole in order to recapture some of the greatness that America forfeited over the last 40 years in which we've allowed the Left to set the Agenda for America!! In that respect, William Jefferson Clinton must be considered the Epitome of Evil and treated accordingly.
IMHO, God would approve...MUD
And this means what, exactly, for the upcoming discussions?
But then most people aren't like me.
It's not a fantasy novel per se (of course, neither is LOTR, but that's off the subject). It's not strict narrative. As a result, it can be offputting to those expecting any of the above.
But if one reads LOTR and The Hobbit first - and loves them - then you can approach The Silmarillion with a sense of why these events and people matter.
Well...
1. Frankly I was trying to dissuade him - and anyone else - from making The Silmarillion his introduction to Tolkien.
I think it's a poor place to start, really. And I would hate to see anyone so put off by it that they give up on Tolkien altogether.
2. Many people are not aware that The Silmarillion as published is not the one that was floating in Tolkien's head. I think it best to ground one's self in what Tolkine really meant to put out there before delving into the mountains of literature that Tolkien left piled up in his house when he died.
Chris Tolkien has done a wonderful job bringing it all to the public and making some kind of sense of it all.
Due to its nature, however, it's not as accessible at TH or LOTR.
Well, I can understand wanting to tackle The Hobbit and The Lord of the Rings? before going on to The Silmarillion. But are you saying that The Silmarillion is of no use when discussing Tolkien's The Hobbit and The Lord of the Rings?
Absolutely not.
I just caution against making TS one's first point of introduction to Tolkien's world.
It's less accessible - and it's all posthumous.
For those who love Middle Earth, however (as I do), it is indispensible.
The Silmarillion has just as much legitimacy as the History of Middle Earth volumes do.
What made it into TS - as Chris wrote it - was just what was most publishable and most consistent. And as close as Chris knew he could come to what what he knew of his father's intentions for the work.
Ultimately what we're left with is an incomplete and sometimes contradictory picture because that's the state Tolkien left things in when he died.
As Martinez has noted, the only things strictly canonical - if we use that term - is what's in TH, LOTR and the LOTR appendices. Everything else has been posthumous.
We end up treating TS as something approaching canon because it's the best single reference we have for the Elder Days. I don't have a problem with that.
Neither should anyone else.
What informs part of my warnings is that I've known some people who jumped into The Silmarillion and were much put off by it. They were expecting a gripping fantasy narrative and what they got was something that seemed translated out of the Elder Eddas with a little bit of Holinshed thrown in.
TS remains near and dear to my heart but I try not to make the mistake of thinking that everyone will love it like I do. Or at least that they know what they're getting into when they read it.
They're more likely to appraoch it in the right frame of mind if they read and fall in love with LOTR first.
Those that don't care for LOTR - who find it long and lugubrious and overwritten - will be put off even more by The Silmarillion.
I think the canon/non-canon issue is really a secondary one anyway.
Amen! God gave us a FreeWill, and we turned our dominion over to the Devil.
Now, God being 'Just', has to let what we chose to loose in the world, play out in this world.
I hate seeing folks blame God for bad circumstances or conditions. We invited in all the evil garbage- He has to let things go to their conclusions.
Fortunately, He sometimes extends "Grace" and "Mercy", but that is a gift, and cannot be demanded nor expected.
Also, God did NOT promise us 'justice on earth- but justice in the eternal.
He does Love Righteousness, and we do sometimes see His judgment in the world, but we CAN rely on His Justice in the Eternal Hereafter.
All of The Silmarillion was not only floating around in Tolkien's head, but written down in various places. So, I think while we didn't get all of the Silmarillion, it is also wrong to say the one we did get wasn't the one "floating" around in Tolkien's head. It most definitely was:-)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.