Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

N. Korean Missile Export... Blocked by China(a factor in forcing missile launches?)
MBC (SKor TV) ^ | 09/04/06 | Shin Kyung-min

Posted on 09/04/2006 4:42:41 PM PDT by TigerLikesRooster

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 next last
To: TigerLikesRooster

It sounds like the Chinese are sending Mini-Me a not-so-subtle message that he needs them far more than they need him.


21 posted on 09/04/2006 6:29:15 PM PDT by WestVirginiaRebel (Common sense will do to liberalism what the atomic bomb did to Nagasaki-Rush Limbaugh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tinman73; RS
Remember, it could of been a self destruct (Abort).

Yeah, and it could've been an Airborne Laser Intercept test.

And it could've been an Aurora knock down.

And it could've been an intervention by the hidden Overlord colonization fleet.

22 posted on 09/04/2006 6:30:38 PM PDT by sam_paine (X .................................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ASA Vet; Grampa Dave

DPRK ping


23 posted on 09/04/2006 6:31:29 PM PDT by BIGLOOK (Keelhauling is a sensible solution to mutiny.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AmericanInTokyo
Re #16

I agree. If possible, landing should be done on Sunan, Nampo which is near Pyongyahng on the Western coast, and Wonsan and Chongjin on the East coast. Denying China the direct access to East Sea(Sea of Japan) must be an important strategic imperative.

24 posted on 09/04/2006 6:31:45 PM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: WestVirginiaRebel
Re #21

Right.

25 posted on 09/04/2006 6:32:22 PM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar

What country would want that basket case led by a lunatic on its border. Our border relations with Mexico by comparison are a vision of delights.


26 posted on 09/04/2006 6:33:52 PM PDT by justshutupandtakeit (If you believe ANYTHING in the Treason Media you are a fool.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
Re #15

Correction:

Uset Used to be Egypt, Syria, Libya, Yemen, Pakistan, and Iran.

27 posted on 09/04/2006 6:41:18 PM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
PRC would love nothing more than to have the functioning seaports of Wonsan and Chongjin (of the DPRK) for their own Red Navy. Ummmmm, delicious, marine ports on the Sea of Japan facing Japan.


28 posted on 09/04/2006 6:42:29 PM PDT by AmericanInTokyo (..is an American allright, but is not in Japan, folks. Thanks for letting me keep the moniker.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: AmericanInTokyo

29 posted on 09/04/2006 6:44:44 PM PDT by AmericanInTokyo (..is an American allright, but is not in Japan, folks. Thanks for letting me keep the moniker.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

If China decided they wanted to, when prodded Kim Jong-il would let them move down to the DMZ before we decided what to do about it.

It's a close call, but I think China will let the South have it. They have nothing worthwhile to gain from taking the North.


30 posted on 09/04/2006 6:45:19 PM PDT by RS ("I took the drugs because I liked them and I found excuses to take them, so I'm not weaseling.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: RS
Re #30

As I said, how about access to East Sea(Sea of Japan)?

31 posted on 09/04/2006 6:47:46 PM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

RE #31

Maybe just the Coastline would be worth it, But who in the right mind would want a country that has 24 Million Starving Peasants. I mean the Commies have their own problems as it is with their own Muslim Group, Their Poor Peasants and so on.

But then taking over the coastline only is practically an act of war since Japan would feel extremely treathened.

Taking over the entire country is more of a burden. It would take a hell of alot of aids just to feed them since the current amount of aid isnt enough since it is usually given to the army.

But on the other hand, They can retrieve their Aid Trains back which is a good thing!


32 posted on 09/04/2006 7:04:14 PM PDT by Petey139
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

"As I said, how about access to East Sea(Sea of Japan)?"

For what ? This is not like it's 1910 anymore. They would have to rebuild much of North Koreas infrastructure to get there, then when they do, of what benefit is it ?


33 posted on 09/04/2006 7:11:02 PM PDT by RS ("I took the drugs because I liked them and I found excuses to take them, so I'm not weaseling.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Petey139
Re #32

One of the scenarios I can suspect China could entertain is that China will secure some buffer zone to the south of Yalu and Tumen River. "How far to the south" is to be negotiated with U.S., and they would also demand a north eastern chunk of N. Korea(part of N. Hamkyong Province) including decent seaport on East Sea. This way, it would not much of a burden for China, and in exchange for ceding direct control of most of N. Korea, China secures nice seaport for PLAN.

34 posted on 09/04/2006 7:14:08 PM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Petey139; RS

See my reply #34.


35 posted on 09/04/2006 7:15:18 PM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: AmericanInTokyo

Pardon my ignorance but, after 50 plus years of communism NK is a poor, starving country. What are the spoils?


36 posted on 09/04/2006 7:24:56 PM PDT by Former Proud Canadian (How do I change my screen name after Harper's election?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: AmericanInTokyo

"PRC would love nothing more than to have the functioning seaports of Wonsan and Chongjin"

Why would any commander in his right mind want to build immoveable Navy bases within strike range of your enemies aircraft ?


37 posted on 09/04/2006 7:29:03 PM PDT by RS ("I took the drugs because I liked them and I found excuses to take them, so I'm not weaseling.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: RS

You'd have to take that up with Beijing!


38 posted on 09/04/2006 7:40:16 PM PDT by AmericanInTokyo (..is an American allright, but is not in Japan, folks. Thanks for letting me keep the moniker.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: paudio

Well it would be safe to say that NK's customers are the enemies of tbe U.S., ya think?


39 posted on 09/04/2006 7:44:51 PM PDT by Minutemen ("It's a Religion of Peace")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Former Proud Canadian

coal, lead, tungsten, zinc, graphite, magnesite, iron ore, copper, gold, pyrites, salt, fluorspar, hydropower, intact missile launch sites, fishery access, salt water ports.....


40 posted on 09/04/2006 7:44:59 PM PDT by AmericanInTokyo (..is an American allright, but is not in Japan, folks. Thanks for letting me keep the moniker.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson