Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Kennedy’s Comrade: Hunting a KGB Mole in the Democratic Party
Original FReeper research | 10/23/2006 | Fedora

Posted on 10/23/2006 2:07:13 PM PDT by Fedora

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-200 ... 251-263 next last
I was not planning on posting this yet, but in light of Paul Kengor's book Crusader receiving publicity last week, I thought I should round up what I had. Some related threads at:

KGB Letter Outlines Sen. Kennedy's Overtures to Soviets, Prof Says

The Kennedy KGB letter

Profiles in Duplicity

Kennedy Outed as Traitor; MSM will ignore per NYT "guiding hand."

1 posted on 10/23/2006 2:07:16 PM PDT by Fedora
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: bnelson44; piytar; bitt; grandpa jones

Pinging some who have posted related threads or pinged me on related threads.


2 posted on 10/23/2006 2:12:16 PM PDT by Fedora
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fedora

Bump


3 posted on 10/23/2006 2:12:50 PM PDT by Enterprise (Let's not enforce laws that are already on the books, let's just write new laws we won't enforce.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fedora

-bflr-


4 posted on 10/23/2006 2:16:37 PM PDT by rellimpank (-don't believe anything the MSM states about firearms or explosives--NRA Benefactor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe; piasa; Enchante; ScaniaBoy; Liz; windchime; Blurblogger; STARWISE; backhoe; ...

Ping.


5 posted on 10/23/2006 2:18:17 PM PDT by Fedora
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Fedora

without reading the article, my guess is

ALAN F*#$%^&G CRANSTON!


6 posted on 10/23/2006 2:21:08 PM PDT by ConservativeDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Fedora

bttt


7 posted on 10/23/2006 2:22:01 PM PDT by kalee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fedora

Just "one" mole...how about the entire core of the demonrats???


8 posted on 10/23/2006 2:22:43 PM PDT by Dr Stormfist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeDude

OK. Read the article now.

Seems it wasn't Cranston, but the other California communist Senator Tunney.

Liberals are so disgusting.


9 posted on 10/23/2006 2:27:12 PM PDT by ConservativeDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Fedora

Rush mentioned Kennedy's attempts to use his influence in negotiations between the US and Andropov today. It looks like the veil might be lifted on some of the old fellow travelers and cast a light on their current political leanings.


10 posted on 10/23/2006 2:27:33 PM PDT by saganite (Billions and billions and billions-------and that's just the NASA budget!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Fedora

Great work.

one correction: Ed Reinecke was Lieutenant Governor, but never served as Governor. Probably just a typo.


11 posted on 10/23/2006 2:28:34 PM PDT by ElkGroveDan (The California Republican Party needs Arnold the way a drowning man needs an anvil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fedora

Treason runs rampant in the Democratic Party.


12 posted on 10/23/2006 2:28:44 PM PDT by Don Corleone (Leave the gun..take the cannoli)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fedora
Fedora, although it would be very early on in the 70's but wouldn't Clinton's KGB/Moscow visit fit into this time frame also when he was expelled from Oxford University?
13 posted on 10/23/2006 2:32:14 PM PDT by AmeriBrit (Soros and Clinton's for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington = SCREW.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fedora

Excellent piece of work. Many fascinating connections.

I was an undergraduate during the Army McCarthy hearings, and I naively subscribed to the view that McCarthy was a witch hunter. At the same time, it was clear to me back then, and I think always, that the Soviet Union was our enemy and that Communism was as bad as Nazism, if not worse.

It's been fascinating to learn just how many of our politicians and their aides were, in fact, actual Communists.

I don't really understand what would have led Teddy Kennedy to become a Communist patsy, other than the fact that he seems to be both evil and stupid. Unlike many of those other people, the Kennedy family does not seem to have had a Communist background. Mobsters, yes, but not Communists that I have heard of. I would have suspected Jimmy Carter before Teddy Kennedy.


14 posted on 10/23/2006 2:32:56 PM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fedora

Nothing has changed with the DNC since FDR.


15 posted on 10/23/2006 2:34:06 PM PDT by bmwcyle (Only stupid people would vote for McCain, Warner, Hagle, Snowe, Graham, or any RINO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fedora

Excellent work- thanks for the ping.


16 posted on 10/23/2006 2:35:03 PM PDT by backhoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ElkGroveDan

Thanks for catching that! I think he ran for Governor in '74 and I had that in mind, but something got crossed between my brain and fingers, LOL.


17 posted on 10/23/2006 2:37:14 PM PDT by Fedora
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Fedora

OUTSTANDING JOB!!

I was totally fascinated by what you found...and am looking forward to any further notes you come up with.

If you have a ping list for this...could you add me, please??

Thank you for all of the hard work you have put into this.


18 posted on 10/23/2006 2:37:45 PM PDT by Txsleuth (EVERYONE VOTE---AND VOTE REPUBLICAN,...even if you have to hold your nose!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fedora

Good work, Fedora. I don't know whether Tunney is the guy, but this is an excellent piece of work.


19 posted on 10/23/2006 2:37:53 PM PDT by expatpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fedora

btt


20 posted on 10/23/2006 2:38:18 PM PDT by OldCorps
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fedora

Bookmarking


21 posted on 10/23/2006 2:38:42 PM PDT by ABG(anybody but Gore) ("By the time I'm finished with you, you're gonna wish you felt this good again" - Jack Bauer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fedora
Interesting - Tunney was the inspiration for Robert Redford's character in the film, The Candidate.
22 posted on 10/23/2006 2:41:06 PM PDT by oblomov (Join the FR Folding@Home Team (#36120) keyword: folding@home)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fedora
Bump

L-R: Mieke and John Tunney, Teddy and Joan Kennedy

23 posted on 10/23/2006 2:41:12 PM PDT by grandpa jones (Responding To The Epic Threat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fedora

Thats got to be like hunting for a needle in a stack of needles.


24 posted on 10/23/2006 2:41:31 PM PDT by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fedora

Hi Fedora, I'm going to bookmark this for a fascinating read later today. In the meantime, BTTT! :)


25 posted on 10/23/2006 2:41:42 PM PDT by Chena ("I'm not young enough to know everything." (Oscar Wilde))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fedora

An astonishing piece of work! I am not at all surprised at the conclusions, though.


26 posted on 10/23/2006 2:42:04 PM PDT by T'wit (Rich Aunt Tillie's slow to die? You need her money? Can't afford a mafia hit? Call a bioethicist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AmeriBrit

I think Clinton was active with the British antiwar movement in the 1968/1969 timeframe, IIRC. There were quite a few antiwar people who made trips to Moscow (often entering via Scandinavia) during this period.


27 posted on 10/23/2006 2:43:20 PM PDT by Fedora
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Fedora

Former U.S. Senator John V. Tunney with his former wife, Mieke, and Senator Ted Kennedy with his former wife, Joan.
28 posted on 10/23/2006 2:45:49 PM PDT by ElkGroveDan (The California Republican Party needs Arnold the way a drowning man needs an anvil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fedora

It's the kind of thing that the MSM would skewer you over as a means to denigrate the entire piece.


29 posted on 10/23/2006 2:47:21 PM PDT by ElkGroveDan (The California Republican Party needs Arnold the way a drowning man needs an anvil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Don Corleone
Treason runs rampant in the Democratic Party.

Treason is an old tradition of the Democrats that dates all the way back to the Civil War. It's in their blood.

30 posted on 10/23/2006 2:47:24 PM PDT by Ditto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Fedora

Tunney fell into a classic KGB "honey trap" ?


31 posted on 10/23/2006 2:48:47 PM PDT by 1066AD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fedora

Democrat = CPUSA.

It's been true at least since the days of Hiss, White, and Wallace. Disgusting.


32 posted on 10/23/2006 2:49:06 PM PDT by 2 Kool 2 Be 4-Gotten
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
I don't really understand what would have led Teddy Kennedy to become a Communist patsy, other than the fact that he seems to be both evil and stupid. Unlike many of those other people, the Kennedy family does not seem to have had a Communist background. Mobsters, yes, but not Communists that I have heard of. I would have suspected Jimmy Carter before Teddy Kennedy.

I'm still trying to figure that out as well. I think it's probably rooted in Robert Kennedy's shift towards the antiwar movement in the mid-60s. This occurred on several fronts. Vietnam was the most public expression of it, but there was also his relationship to Cesar Chavez, and his involvement with the left wing of the anti-Castro movement, which predated the Bay of Pigs. The Kennedys supported a left-wing faction of the anti-Castro exile community against a more conservative faction which was closer to Nixon and to Allen Dulles' faction of the CIA. I think the Kennedys' rivalry with Nixon and LBJ had a lot to do with it. Robert was planning to run against LBJ in '68, and Ted was a candidate to run against Nixon in '72 and remained involved in the campaign even after he dropped out following Chappaquidick, so I think it was partly a case of the Kennedys opportunistically aligning with Nixon's enemies, domestic and foreign. This became easier to do after Nixon initiated detente and Ted could legally travel to Russia; I think Ted was taking advantage of that opportunity.

33 posted on 10/23/2006 2:52:17 PM PDT by Fedora
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Txsleuth

I don't have a ping list for this because this is the only thing I've posted on this subject, but I'll make a note to ping you if I post on it agian in the future. Thanks for reading!


34 posted on 10/23/2006 2:53:48 PM PDT by Fedora
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Fedora

As I read your excellent work, I was thinking of the more recent spy/leaker (what ever) in the Democrat party, Jane Harmon. Apparently she is connected to AIPAC and the case of the US guy who leaked to the Israelis.


35 posted on 10/23/2006 2:54:54 PM PDT by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fedora
All I have is my memory to go on and recollection of what I read in the local Oxford newspaper at the time, and that was that when he was expelled and ordered to leave the country he was whisked off to Moscow at the invitation and expense of the KGB.
36 posted on 10/23/2006 2:55:33 PM PDT by AmeriBrit (Soros and Clinton's for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington = SCREW.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: ElkGroveDan
It's the kind of thing that the MSM would skewer you over as a means to denigrate the entire piece.

Yes; but they'll do that anyway :-)

37 posted on 10/23/2006 2:55:55 PM PDT by Fedora
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Fedora

Ann Coulter's excellent book "Treason" is a great place to start in on study of Democrat support for the USSR in the Cold War. "Liberal Treachery" is her phrase, and it's a good one.


38 posted on 10/23/2006 2:57:50 PM PDT by Jack Black
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Fedora

Thank you for the response. Your work is extremely interesting.


39 posted on 10/23/2006 2:58:07 PM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Ditto
Treason is an old tradition of the Democrats that dates all the way back to the Civil War. It's in their blood.

Huh? Civil War period?

40 posted on 10/23/2006 2:59:58 PM PDT by Jack Black
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Fedora
Human Events article from 2003

This document was first discovered in the Soviet archives by London Times reporter Tim Sebastian and a report on it was published in that newspaper in February 1992. Sen. Kennedy played a major role during the 1970s in Grafting the restrictions that made it so difficult for the FBI and CIA to do the job of protecting the American people. One of the most pernicious restrictions was the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) passed in 1978. ... When Congress discussed legislation to require a court warrant to wiretap enemy agents and terrorists, Kennedy and the ACLU began a campaign to raise the barriers as high as possible. Kennedy introduced the concept in the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Bill that required evidence that someone was providing classified information to a foreign intelligence service. Someone who "only" had a clandestine relationship with a foreign intelligence officer and carried out covert influence operations for a foreign power could not be wiretapped. When we see the KGB reports we can understand why Kennedy would want this provision in the law. Kennedy was not a KGB agent. He also was not "a useful idiot" who was used by the KGB without understanding what he was doing. Kennedy was a collaborationist. He aided the KGB for his own political purposes.

41 posted on 10/23/2006 3:00:11 PM PDT by grandpa jones (Responding To The Epic Threat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: 1066AD
Tunney also seems to have been a setter of honey traps. In my note on one of the sources mentioned above, Richard E. Burke's The Senator: My Ten Years With Senator Ted Kennedy, I jotted down this note from pages 138-139 on Tunney's attempt to introduce Kennedy to a Politburo aide named Natasha:

138-139: Kennedy invited to give keynote address at September 1978 World Health Organization meeting in Soviet Socialist Republic of Kazakhstan, decides to meet with Refuseniks on trip, asks advice from Tunney due to his business contacts in USSR and association with Karr in building hotel for 1980 Olympics, Karr is linked to Politburo functionary named “Andrei” with aide Natasha whom Tunney had spent time on Karr’s yacht, Tunney tells Kennedy Natasha might be point of contact with Brezhnev regarding Refuseniks

42 posted on 10/23/2006 3:00:35 PM PDT by Fedora
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Eva

I recall Harmon's name coming up as linked to some of Tunney's associates--think she was his aide or something at one point a while back, but I need to double-check that.


43 posted on 10/23/2006 3:02:03 PM PDT by Fedora
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Fedora

Fascinating, a great effort. In the context of Carter's similar approach to the Soviets to discredit Reagan, we see that the Dems operated as a shadow government with a shadow State Department running back channels to the Soviets with whom they shared a common fear and loathing of Reagan. Just like the actual State Deparment, the shadow State Department had traitors. Does anyone know if Carter's approach was through Tunney? Did Kennedy know Tunney was working for the Commies?


44 posted on 10/23/2006 3:04:17 PM PDT by Buckhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fedora
Excellent analysis.

I can't wait until you start your investigation on Bill and Hillary Clinton. I hope it is before the 2008 elections.

45 posted on 10/23/2006 3:04:58 PM PDT by Gritty (The Declaration of Independence is a spiritual document, rooted in religious convictions-C. Coolidge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fedora
"I don't really understand what would have led Teddy Kennedy to become a Communist patsy"

I have a theory that may provide some insight into that which I posted on a previous story about the Cape Cod Orka's dance with Communism…money…filthy luger.

Don't know if you were aware of this…I remember reading about Teddy's money problems in: The Senator: My Ten Years with Ted Kennedy, by Richard E. Burke…the next thing I read in Do As I Say (Not As I Do): Profiles in Liberal Hypocrisy, by Peter Schweizer that he's got Family Royalty Trusts set up in FIJI…"drag a dolla bill down a HYANNISPORT beach…you never know what you'll attract".

UNITA: The Battle in Angola
Freedom vs. Communism
The Conservative Caucus
450 Maple Avenue East * Vienna, Va. 22180 * 703-938-9626

excerpted…

Maurice Tempelsman, a diamond broker who served as an agent of influence for the Angolan Communist regime, secured the companionship of Jacqueline Kennedy Onassis, who, for a number of years served as his mistress. Tempelsman was able to use this relationship, in combination with the Angolan oil payoffs to the Kennedy family to secure a completely pro-Communist Angolan policy by the new administration of Bill Clinton, which arranged for U.N. sanctions and follow-up U.S. sanctions on the anti-Communist UNITA freedom fighters led by Jonas Savimbi.

http://www.conservativeusa.org/angola.htm
46 posted on 10/23/2006 3:05:54 PM PDT by dgallo51 (DEMAND IMMEDIATE, OPEN INVESTIGATIONS OF U.S. COMPLICITY IN RWANDAN GENOCIDE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Fedora

Great article. I have often thought that Bill Clinton might have been recruited as well while at Oxford. He did spend time in Moscow while supposedly a student there. None of this is really a surprise as the party is full of card carrying Communists. The lousy thing is that the public hasn't a clue.


47 posted on 10/23/2006 3:05:55 PM PDT by ladyinred (RIP my precious Lamb Chop)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fedora

I don't really understand what would have led Teddy Kennedy to become a Communist patsy, other than the fact that he seems to be both evil and stupid. Unlike many of those other people, the Kennedy family does not seem to have had a Communist background. Mobsters, yes, but not Communists that I have heard of. I would have suspected Jimmy Carter before Teddy Kennedy.

I'm still trying to figure that out as well. I think it's probably rooted in Robert Kennedy's shift towards the antiwar movement in the mid-60s. This occurred on several fronts. Vietnam was the most public expression of it, but there was also his relationship to Cesar Chavez, and his involvement with the left wing of the anti-Castro movement, which predated the Bay of Pigs. The Kennedys supported a left-wing faction of the anti-Castro exile community against a more conservative faction which was closer to Nixon and to Allen Dulles' faction of the CIA. I think the Kennedys' rivalry with Nixon and LBJ had a lot to do with it. Robert was planning to run against LBJ in '68, and Ted was a candidate to run against Nixon in '72 and remained involved in the campaign even after he dropped out following Chappaquidick, so I think it was partly a case of the Kennedys opportunistically aligning with Nixon's enemies, domestic and foreign. This became easier to do after Nixon initiated detente and Ted could legally travel to Russia; I think Ted was taking advantage of that opportunity.




Thought provoking discussion. I think the political winds and grounds were shifting duing the late 60's. It's easy sitting here in 2006 to underestimate how volatile things were back then and how scared some folks in power that the whole thing was going to fall apart at the seams. Society and politics were literally ripped apart by the SDS, the antiwar movement, the love and peace crowd and on and on.

We always talk about our "leaders" but that, in almost all cases, is an extreme mis-characterization. Politicians are obviously the crassest of opportunists. 1968 perhaps, was the pivotal year with the Tet Offensive and LBJ bowing out of the race.

Both RFK and Edward the swimmer, sensed the shift in the political winds and hitched their fortunes to the new wind that was blowing. And as the "honey pot" poster pointed out, there was a lot of tail to be had in the process, something that certainly fits the Kennedy persona.

I think JFK was a reasonably solid anti-communist, if not by the standards of 1960 then at least by the standards of today. I think when things really started coming apart in 1968 the Kennedy's sold out to the side that would take them the farthest and the result is the information being discussed here. In other words, The times really were a changin' and the Kennedy's wanted to crawl on board.


48 posted on 10/23/2006 3:08:56 PM PDT by 2 Kool 2 Be 4-Gotten
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Fedora

My guess was always that this mole was Ron Dellums. His communist sympathies weren't exactly secret, but that didn't keep him off the Armed Services and Intelligence committees. Hasn't hurt him politically, either.


49 posted on 10/23/2006 3:08:59 PM PDT by joylyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fedora

Time ran an article about the feds investigating Jane Harmon for ties to AIPAC. I didn't know much about AIPAC, and came up with this article during a quick search:



Bigger Than AIPAC
Robert Dreyfuss
August 09, 2005



Robert Dreyfuss is a freelance writer based in Alexandria, Va., who specializes in politics and national security issues. He is a contributing editor at The Nation, a contributing writer at Mother Jones, a senior correspondent for The American Prospect, and a frequent contributor to Rolling Stone. His book, Devil's Game: How the United States Helped Unleash Fundamentalist Islam, will be published by Henry Holt/Metropolitan Books in the fall.

Important new details of the U.S.-Israeli espionage case involving Larry Franklin, the alleged Pentagon spy, two officials of the American-Israel Public Affairs Committee, and an intelligence official at the Embassy of Israel emerged last week. Two AIPAC officials—who have left the organization—were indicted along with Franklin on charges of "communicat[ing] national defense information to persons not entitled to receive it." In plain English, if not legal-speak, that means spying.

But as the full text of the indictment makes clear, the conspiracy involved not just Franklin and the AIPAC officials, Steve Rosen and Keith Weissman, but at least several other Pentagon officials who played intermediary roles, at least two other Israeli officials, and one official at a "Washington, D.C. think tank." It's an old-fashioned spy story involving the passing of secret documents, hush-hush meetings and outright espionage, along with good-old-boy networking.

But the network tied to the "Franklin case"—which ought to be called the "AIPAC case," since it was AIPAC that was really under investigation by the FBI—provides an important window into a shadowy world. It is clear that by probing the details of the case, the FBI has got hold of a dangerous loose end of much larger story. By pulling on that string hard enough, the FBI and the Justice Department might just unravel that larger story, which is beginning to look more and more like it involves the same nexus of Pentagon civilians, White House functionaries, and American Enterprise Institute officials who thumped the drums for war in Iraq in 2001-2003 and who are now trying to whip up an anti-Iranian frenzy as well.

Needless to say, all of this got short shrift from the mainstream media when it was revealed last week.

The basic facts of the case have been known for a while. Lawrence Anthony Franklin, a Department of Defense official, was caught red-handed giving highly classified papers to two officials, Steve Rosen and Keith Weissman, of AIPAC—in part, concerning U.S. policy toward the Islamic Republic of Iran, Iraq and the war on terrorism. But from the carefully worded indictment, it is clear that a lot more may have been going on. All in all, along with revealing tantalizing new information, the indictment raises more questions than it answers. To wit:

First, the indictment says that from "about April 1999 and continuing until on or about August 27, 2004" Franklin, Rosen and Weissman "did unlawfully, knowingly and willfully conspire" in criminal activity against the United States. So far, no one has explained what triggered an investigation that began more than six years ago. But it reveals how long the three indicted conspirators and "others, known and unknown to the Grand Jury," engaged in such criminal activity. In any case, what appeared at first to be a brief dalliance between Franklin and the two AIPAC officials now—according to the latest indictment, at least—spans more than five years and involves at least several other individuals, at least some of whom are known to the investigation. What triggered the investigation in 1999, and how much information has FBI surveillance, wiretaps and other investigative efforts collected?

Second, the indictment makes it absolutely clear that the investigation was aimed at AIPAC, not at Franklin. The document charges that Rosen and Weissman met repeatedly with officials from a foreign government (Israel, though not named in the indictment) beginning in 1999, to provide them with classified information. In other words, the FBI was looking into the Israel lobby, not Franklin and the Defense Department, at the start, and Franklin was simply caught up in the net when he made contact with the AIPACers. Rosen and Weissman were observed making illicit contact with several other U.S. officials between 1999 and 2004, although those officials are left unnamed (and unindicted). Might there be more to come? Who are these officials, cited merely as United States Government Official 1, USGO 2, etc.?

Third, Franklin was introduced to Rosen-Weissman when the two AIPACers "called a Department of Defense employee (DOD employee A) at the Pentagon and asked for the name of someone in OSD ISA [Office of the Secretary of Defense, International Security Affairs] with an expertise on Iran" and got Franklin's name. Who was "DOD employee A"? Was it Douglas Feith, the undersecretary for policy? Harold Rhode, the ghost-like neocon official who helped Feith assemble the secretive Office of Special Plans, where Franklin worked? The indictment doesn't say. But this reporter observed Franklin, Rhode and Michael Rubin, a former AEI official who served in the Pentagon during this period and then returned to AEI, sitting together side by side, often in the front row, at American Enterprise Institute meetings during 2002-2003. Later in the indictment, we learn that Franklin, Rosen and Weissman hobnobbed with "DOD employee B," too.

Fourth, Rosen and Weissman told Franklin that they would try to get him a job at the White House, on the National Security Council staff. Who did they talk to at the White House, if they followed through? What happened?

Fifth, the charging document refers to "Foreign Official 1," also known as FO-1, obviously referring to an Israeli embassy official or an Israeli intelligence officer. It also refers later to FO-2, FO-3, etc., meaning that other Israeli officials were involved as well. How many Israeli officials are implicated in this, and who are they?

Sixth, was AEI itself involved? The indictment says that "on or about March 13, 2003, Rosen disclosed to a senior fellow at a Washington, D.C., think tank the information relating to the classified draft internal policy document" about Iran. The indictment says that the think tank official agreed "to follow up and see what he could do." Which think tank, and who was involved?

The indictment is rich with other detail, including specific instances in which the indicted parties lied to the FBI about their activities. It describes how Franklin eventually set up a regular liaison with an Israeli official ("FO-3") and met him in Virginia "and elsewhere" to communicate U.S. secrets.

It is an important story, arguably one that has greater implications for national security than the scandal involving the churlish outing of undercover CIA operative Valerie Plame. So far, at least, the media frenzy attending to the Plame affair is matched by nearly total silence about the Franklin-AIPAC affair? Can it be true that reporters are more courageous about pursuing a story that involves the White House than they are about plunging into a scandal that involves Israel, our No. 1 Middle East ally?


50 posted on 10/23/2006 3:12:56 PM PDT by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-200 ... 251-263 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson