Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Our Glorious Gospel
Answers For Today ^ | Chuck Smith

Posted on 01/06/2004 6:08:05 PM PST by P-Marlowe

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-200 ... 2,251-2,295 next last

1 posted on 01/06/2004 6:08:06 PM PST by P-Marlowe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe
Bookmarked. Thanks.
2 posted on 01/06/2004 6:42:58 PM PST by Corin Stormhands (2003 Review www.wardsmythe.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Rank Location Receipts Donors/Avg Freepers/Avg Monthlies
48 Nebraska 35.00
2
17.50
78
0.45
3.00
1

Thanks for donating to Free Republic!

Move your locale up the leaderboard!

3 posted on 01/06/2004 6:43:59 PM PST by Support Free Republic (I'd rather be sleeping. Let's get this over with so I can go back to sleep!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe; drstevej; CCWoody; OrthodoxPresbyterian; RnMomof7; CARepubGal; Alex Murphy; Wrigley; ...
We have a glorious Gospel, but there's only one difficulty. To be effective it has to be applied. A fellow once asked a minister, "If your Gospel is so great, why isn't everyone a Christian?" The pastor responded, "If soap is so good, why isn't everyone clean?" Does the fact of dirty people testify against the value of soap? No. It works, but you have to apply it.

Pretty poor analogy, I'd say. One can clean one's self up with soap, but one cannot apply the Gospel to one's self. No man can clean himself up to come to God. No man can apply the Gospel to himself by himself, and thereby save himself. Unless God enlightens the heart, man cannot understand the Gospel. God must first resuscitate the dead heart of sin, because a spiritually dead man cannot perform the actions of one spiritually alive, i.e. believe the Gospel savingly, repent savingly and receive forgiveness of sins savingly. Only a spiritually alive man can do that. God must act on his heart first, monoergistically, or the man will not believe the Gospel, or receive Christ. God does not consult the man's will to do so, He does so Sovereignly. Spiritually dead men cannot perform God-pleasing acts. They not only cannot, they would not even if they could. Spiritually alive men do perfom God-pleasing acts. They believe the Gospel, they receive the Word and understand it, they repent of their sins, they receive justification by faith, because only spiritually alive men can be justified.

Man must be made spiritually alive before he can receive Christ. That is a sovereign action of God, apart from the man's will or desire. Once made spiritually alive, the man will desire Christ, receive Him, and be justified in Him through faith, which is given him by God when God resuscitates his dead, cold, stony heart of sin and corruption, by the hearing of the Word, which brings Faith. Until God resuscitates that heart, the man has no spiritual ears, no receptive heart, no capacity to believe savingly.

Comparing the Gospel to soap is a poor analogy, and even poorer theology.

4 posted on 01/06/2004 7:30:34 PM PST by nobdysfool (All True Christians will be Calvinists in Glory)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe
If soap is so good, why isn't everyone clean?" Does the fact of dirty people testify against the value of soap? No. It works, but you have to apply it.

Marlowe, it's a good thing for you that drstevej isn't here right now. Because if he were, he would ask you "How is a dead man is gonna wash his own tush?"

5 posted on 01/06/2004 7:39:17 PM PST by Gamecock (The Spirit of Piel is with us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe
BTW,

"Our Glorious Gospel"

I thought it was the Gospel of Christ. What's up with that?
6 posted on 01/06/2004 7:43:14 PM PST by Gamecock (The Spirit of Piel is among us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe; drstevej; Alex Murphy; Gamecock; Wrigley; Jean Chauvin; RnMomof7; CARepubGal; snerkel; ..
We often use the term "free moral agent," but it's almost a misnomer. To say that a man is a free moral agent when he cannot help but do the things he does is a contradiction. If some compelling force is driving you to do things even when you don't want to do them, you're not free. You're a captive.

Almost a misnomer? It IS a misnomer! Unsaved men are captives to sin. As such, they CANNOT free themselves. That's why God must act first. Man does not hold the key to his jail cell. God does. God must FIRST turn the key in the lock (resuscitate the dead, cold, stony heart of sin), Pull open the door (impart Faith by means of the hearing of the Word (the Gospel), and THEN the man can walk out of his jail cell (repent for his sins, believe on Christ, and receive justification).

7 posted on 01/06/2004 8:03:34 PM PST by nobdysfool (May the Piel be with you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nobdysfool
Spiritually alive men do perfom God-pleasing acts. They believe the Gospel, they receive the Word and understand it, they repent of their sins, they receive justification by faith, because only spiritually alive men can be justified.

Are these God-pleasing acts necessary?

Is salvation dependant on them?

8 posted on 01/06/2004 8:38:44 PM PST by PFKEY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: nobdysfool
Another way to ask the question: is a man spiritually alive because he has been justified or has he been justified because he is spiritually alive?
9 posted on 01/06/2004 8:49:19 PM PST by PFKEY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Gamecock
***"Our Glorious Gospel"

I thought it was the Gospel of Christ. What's up with that?**


Thats for all the folks that save themselves .

10 posted on 01/06/2004 8:51:38 PM PST by RnMomof7 (broomstick jockey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: nobdysfool
Maybe we can start with a few definitions?

What does it mean to be justified?

What does it mean to be spiritually alive?

Does a justified man have salvation?

Does a spiritually alive man have salvation?

11 posted on 01/06/2004 9:00:57 PM PST by PFKEY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: RnMomof7
I keep forgeting the "Man alone be the glory" perspective.
12 posted on 01/06/2004 9:08:15 PM PST by Gamecock (The Spirit of Piel is among us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Gamecock; RnMomof7; P-Marlowe
The "Calvinist" Paul didn't seem to have a problem saying "my" gospel.

Romans 16:25
Now to him that is of power to stablish you according to my gospel, and the preaching of Jesus Christ, according to the revelation of the mystery, which was kept secret since the world began...

I'd prolly point that out, but that would be picking at nits.

13 posted on 01/06/2004 9:21:24 PM PST by Corin Stormhands (2003 Review www.wardsmythe.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: nobdysfool
Would God cause a man to be spiritually alive that was not already predestine for salvation i.e elect?

Would God justify a man that was not already predestine for salvation i.e elect?

14 posted on 01/06/2004 9:28:56 PM PST by PFKEY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Corin Stormhands
The "Calvinist" Paul didn't seem to have a problem saying "my" gospel.

But then he was teaching predestination and election so it was the true gospel :>))

15 posted on 01/06/2004 10:10:27 PM PST by RnMomof7 (broomstick jockey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Corin Stormhands; RnMomof7; P-Marlowe
Paul wrote it. When the writings of Chuck Smith are made part of the canon of Scripture he can call it my Gospel.
16 posted on 01/06/2004 10:11:38 PM PST by Gamecock (The Spirit of Piel is among us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Gamecock; Corin Stormhands; xzins; Revelation 911
"Our Glorious Gospel" I thought it was the Gospel of Christ. What's up with that?

2Co 4:3 But if our gospel be hid, it is hid to them that are lost:

1Th 1:5 For our gospel came not unto you in word only, but also in power, and in the Holy Ghost, and in much assurance; as ye know what manner of men we were among you for your sake.

2Th 2:14 Whereunto he called you by our gospel, to the obtaining of the glory of our Lord Jesus Christ.

Yeah, what's up with that?

Its funny you post a simple gospel message and a lot of people just come unglued. Rather than look to the power of the gospel message itself, they look for heresies in every word nit picking every jot and tittle looking for something that they can point to as a hidden theological error and then miss the glorious picture that surrounds them.

BTW Gamecock: Have you?

17 posted on 01/06/2004 10:18:00 PM PST by P-Marlowe (LPFOKETT GAHCOEEP-w/o*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Gamecock
Marlowe once said that Calvinists worship the devil , so I guess he is giving you the four spiritual laws/ Come as you are test
18 posted on 01/06/2004 10:26:09 PM PST by RnMomof7 (broomstick jockey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe
Excellent article by one of America's premier pastor/teachers.

The soap analogy is spot on!
19 posted on 01/06/2004 10:34:19 PM PST by xzins (Retired Army and Proud of It!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe
Its funny you post a simple gospel message and a lot of people just come unglued. Rather than look to the power of the gospel message itself, they look for heresies in every word nit picking every jot and tittle looking for something that they can point to as a hidden theological error and then miss the glorious picture that surrounds them.

I recall someone nit picking the Puritan's evangelical program as if the Great Awakening was the working of the Anti-Christ himself. Funny how we seem to miss our own beams. I'm sure God can use this type of evangelism. Personally, I think this would be effective for children.

The best way to understand the word "meek" is to separate it: me...ek. When I realize how "eeky" I am, I know what meek is all about.
(While he didn't go through a lot of effort to discover the etymology of the word...I think children can relate.)

20 posted on 01/06/2004 10:36:08 PM PST by lockeliberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe; Corin Stormhands
Good to have you back, PM.

N3

21 posted on 01/06/2004 10:36:45 PM PST by xzins (Retired Army and Proud of It!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: lockeliberty; xzins
I'm sure God can use this type of evangelism. Personally, I think this would be effective for children.

Luk 18:17 Verily I say unto you, Whosoever shall not receive the kingdom of God as a little child shall in no wise enter therein.

Seems to me that the best kind of evangelistic gospel sermon is one which a child can relate to.

Lather up.

22 posted on 01/06/2004 10:50:23 PM PST by P-Marlowe (LPFOKETT GAHCOEEP-w/o*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe
Lather up.

Still judging souls, I see.

Care to speak to the beam?

23 posted on 01/06/2004 10:55:33 PM PST by lockeliberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: lockeliberty; xzins
Care to speak to the beam?

If you are talking about that tract where it stated that you have to prepare yourself to be acceptable before the lord before you will be saved, then I don't think that was the gospel. Salvation is not the work of men, it is the work of God. You cannot prepare yourself so that you are somehow worthy to be saved, you just have to believe. Sanctification comes after salvation, not before.

24 posted on 01/06/2004 11:04:38 PM PST by P-Marlowe (LPFOKETT GAHCOEEP-w/o*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe
If you are talking about that tract where it stated that you have to prepare yourself to be acceptable before the lord before you will be saved, then I don't think that was the gospel.

The tract was just a rearticulation of the Puritan evangelical program. Are you saying that our fore-fathers were tricked into Christianity? If one "lathers up" is he preparing for salvation or is he performing his own salvation?

25 posted on 01/06/2004 11:12:04 PM PST by lockeliberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: lockeliberty; xzins
If one "lathers up" is he preparing for salvation or is he performing his own salvation?

The point of the article is not why you would or would not lather up. The point is that if you refuse to lather up then you are preparing for your own damnation. The point is that regardless of the reason why you respond to the gospel message, the fact of the matter is that if you are to be saved, you MUST respond to it. You must do what the gospel says. You must believe. Responding insures your salvation, while refusing to respond insures your damnation.

So if you don't respond to the gospel, the gospel does you no good. The fact that some people refuse to bathe is no reason to believe that soap is not effective. Similarly the fact that some people refuse to heed to gospel message is no reason to believe that the gospel message is not effective.

26 posted on 01/06/2004 11:33:49 PM PST by P-Marlowe (LPFOKETT GAHCOEEP-w/o*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe
Responding insures your salvation, while refusing to respond insures your damnation.

Let me try to define our "lather up" analogy and the differences in our perspectives.

You would say:

Man "lathers up" through his own personal response.

I would say:

God "lathers up" man so that he can respond.

Does this accurately reflect our different perspectives?

27 posted on 01/06/2004 11:51:47 PM PST by lockeliberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: PFKEY; drstevej; Wrigley; Alex Murphy; OrthodoxPresbyterian; Gamecock; Calvinist_Dark_Lord; ...
Are these God-pleasing acts necessary?

Can a man be saved without them? Let me be very clear here, because I know the tendency is to try to distort what Calvinists say. The man performs the acts. I don't think there can be any argument on that point. The question is, does he perform the acts totally on his own initiative, or does God enable the man to do so?

The Arminian says that salvation is of God.

The Calvinist says the same.

The Arminian says that the man must choose to come to God, but they don't address his ability to do so. The assumption is that man is able to make that choice, unaided, only needing to hear the Gospel.

The Calvinist says that man cannot choose to do so on his own, so God must first enable the man to hear the Gospel so that he CAN believe it, and receive Christ.

The Arminian says that's "Prevenient Grace", that wonderful catch-all term that is at the same time universal, yet specific, and sufficient by itself to enable man to make his own choice to receive Christ.

The Calvinist says that God's enabling of the man is Irresistable Grace, or Effectual Grace, meaning that it is specific, not universal, and that it is never failing in those to whom it is granted.

The Arminian says that God does not override man's free will in this, that the man's free will is sacrosanct, inviolable, or God would be some sort of draconian monster, pushing people around, and making them do things they don't want to do, although they never really explain why God forcing someone to be saved would be a bad thing, seeing that it is of infinite value to the one so saved.

The Calvinist says that God, without consulting the man's will, unilaterally resuscitates the sinner's dead, cold, stony heart of sin, a heart that is incapable of hearing or believing the gospel (the preaching of the gospel is to them that perish foolishness), thereby enabling the man to hear the Gospel with spiritually-alive ears so that Faith can come (faith cometh by hearing, and hearing by the Word of God), and the man can believe, the Gospel, receive forgiveness of sins, Christ can dwell in his heart (which must be spiritually alive), and he can receive justification.

The man is the one doing the believing and receiving, God is the one that makes it possible. Man freely chooses to do so, because he has been made spiritually alive by the power and Grace of God, but he cannot do those things UNTIL he is FIRST made spiritually alive. Spiritually-dead men cannot believe savingly, cannot receive Christ into their hearts, and cannot be justified, because they are spiritually dead. No spiritually-dead man can ever do any act pleasing to God. Only spiritually-alive men can do so.

28 posted on 01/07/2004 2:28:18 AM PST by nobdysfool (All True Christians will be Calvinists in Glory)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: nobdysfool
I appreciate your reply. However, I'm not sure you addressed my questions as much as you restated your premise.

Can a man be saved without them?

It would appear that would be the case.

I say that because it is my understanding that for God to bring a man to perform a God-pleasing act then he is predestined for salvation. He is already saved no act is required or necessary or this would deny God's sovereignty.

If this is not the case than the works of man in some manner are required for salvation?

29 posted on 01/07/2004 3:50:09 AM PST by PFKEY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: lockeliberty; P-Marlowe
You would say: Man "lathers up" through his own personal response. I would say: God "lathers up" man so that he can respond. Does this accurately reflect our different perspectives?

No, it is not accurate.

I would exactly say the same: "God 'lathers up' man so that he can respond.

Where I perceive our difference is this:

You say: "God lathers up man and responds for the man, and it is a permanent lathering."

I say: "God 'lathers up' man so that he can respond, and then the man is able to make the choice for permanent 'lathering.'"

I'm not sure that this is what P-Marlowe would say.

30 posted on 01/07/2004 4:45:50 AM PST by xzins (Retired Army and Proud of It!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: xzins
I say: "God 'lathers up' man so that he can respond, and then the man is able to make the choice for permanent 'lathering.'"

So man can resist the call of God.

31 posted on 01/07/2004 4:58:56 AM PST by Wrigley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Wrigley
No. Man cannot resist prevenient grace. It is given to every man who comes into the world.

The Lord does not force regenerative/saving/justifying grace on anyone, though. It follows from the acceptance of the new covenant. Abraham believed God and it was credited to him as righteousness.
32 posted on 01/07/2004 5:06:23 AM PST by xzins (Retired Army and Proud of It!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: PFKEY; drstevej; Wrigley; Alex Murphy; Gamecock; Calvinist_Dark_Lord; Frumanchu; CCWoody; ...

Can a man be saved without them?

It would appear that would be the case.

I say that because it is my understanding that for God to bring a man to perform a God-pleasing act then he is predestined for salvation. He is already saved no act is required or necessary or this would deny God's sovereignty.

Actually the answer to your questions are contained within my premise, if you look. I will attempt to expand on it a little. Even though a man is predestined for salvation, he still must be brought by God to ability to perform the actions that obtain salvation for that man. Predestination does not mean that it is already done, only that it will be done.

If this is not the case than the works of man in some manner are required for salvation?

Not REQUIRED in the sense that it is those works themselves that save him, but they are the natural actions of a spiritually-alive man. God resuscitating the man's heart makes it possible for the man to perform actions pleasing to God. The very first of those acts is to believe on Christ, which results in eternal life.

The mistake is thinking that the actions themselves save, or that God's Predestination itself saves, apart from the work of Christ, or from God's resuscitation of the sinner's heart. Man cooperates in the sense that he freely chooses Christ, AFTER he has first been resucitated by God to be ABLE to cooperate. This is where the Arminians miss it. They believe that God has already provided all that is necessary for man to choose Christ, WITHOUT the specific and individual resuscitation of the sinner's heart by God prior to belief. They believe that the sinner first believes, which then resuscitates his heart, something akin to a patient in cardiac arrest applying the paddles to himself to restart his own heart.

The works themselves do not cause salvation. They are evidence that salvation has occurred. As James says, "faith without works is dead, being alone. Show me your faith apart from works, and I will show you my faith BY my works."

33 posted on 01/07/2004 5:19:41 AM PST by nobdysfool (All True Christians will be Calvinists in Glory)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: xzins
A question if I may.

Where are these different graced derived?

prevenient
regenerative
saving
justifying

How are they defined?

When are they applied?

What conditions are present for their application?


34 posted on 01/07/2004 5:20:45 AM PST by PFKEY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: xzins; drstevej; Wrigley; Alex Murphy; Calvinist_Dark_Lord; Gamecock; CCWoody; Frumanchu; ...
You say: "God lathers up man and responds for the man, and it is a permanent lathering."

Maybe you want to think that's what we're saying, but no Calvinist has ever said that God responds for the man. That is a gross misrepreentation of the Calvinist position, and I think you know that it is. I expect a little more accuracy from you than that, xzins. As long as we've been discussing it, you know that is not what we say.

35 posted on 01/07/2004 5:27:08 AM PST by nobdysfool (All True Christians will be Calvinists in Glory)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: nobdysfool
actions that obtain salvation for that man.
Action but not works obtain salvation?

Predestination does not mean that it is already done, only that it will be done.

Done on what conditions or at what time?

Not REQUIRED in the sense that it is those works themselves that save him...The very first of those acts is to believe on Christ, which results in eternal life.

Is not this act of believing required for eternal life/salvation or are eternal life and salvation different?

The mistake is thinking that the actions themselves save, or that God's Predestination itself saves, apart from the work of Christ, or from God's resuscitation of the sinner's heart. Man cooperates in the sense that he freely chooses Christ, AFTER he has first been resucitated by God to be ABLE to cooperate.

I'm afraid I am missing something here too.
Is it not God's will?
Predestination is not sufficient.
Christ works are not sufficient.
Man or his works are not sufficient.

God needs mans cooperation to be able to affect his soviergn will?

God needed to have Christ's works to enable his sovereign will?

God needed his own predestination of the elect to grant his sovereign will?

The works themselves do not cause salvation. They are evidence that salvation has occurred.

Who requires this evidence?

Of what value is this evidence and to whom does it have value?

36 posted on 01/07/2004 5:51:38 AM PST by PFKEY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: nobdysfool; P-Marlowe
Actually, I don't know that. It might be a misrepresentation, but if it is, it isn't because I know that it is.

That is what I honestly conclude after combining the doctrines of pre-faith regeneration and irresistible grace together. Especially after our discussions of the philippian jailer, I've come to understand that you believe the new birth happens BEFORE a person becomes a believer.

37 posted on 01/07/2004 5:53:53 AM PST by xzins (Retired Army and Proud of It!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe; drstevej
I Cleansed Me from Sin



I praise You, O God!
For giving Me hope,
For Jesus Who died,
And left me the soap.

Hallelujah! Mine the glory.
Hallelujah! Amen.
Hallelujah! Mine the glory.
I Cleansed me from sin.

We praise Thee, O God!
For Thy Spirit of light,
Who hath shown us our Savior,
With prevenient eyesight

Hallelujah! Mine the glory.
Hallelujah! Amen.
Hallelujah! Mine the glory.
I Cleansed me from sin.

All glory and praise
To the Lamb that was slain,
Who hath borne all our sins,
Yet I scrubbed every stain.

Hallelujah! Mine the glory.
Hallelujah! Amen.
Hallelujah! Mine the glory.
I Cleansed me from sin.

Some glory and praise
To the God in my mind,
Who hast brought me, but taught me,
To scrub my be-hind.

Hallelujah! Mine the glory.
Hallelujah! Amen.
Hallelujah! Mine the glory.
Brought to you by drstevej courtesy of the....
Clear Channel
Woody.

38 posted on 01/07/2004 6:58:38 AM PST by CCWoody (Recognize that all true Christians will be Calvinists in glory,...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe
2Th 2:14 Whereunto he called you by our gospel, to the obtaining of the glory of our Lord Jesus Christ.

Come on counselor: They called you by their Gospel, they wrote it, not you! BTW, those are a couple of impressive proffs for Calvinism, thanks for posting them!

Once you are in the canon I will cut you some slack.

The Marlowe Theology library:

The Chick Tract is about a lawyer. What's up with that Marlowe?

The Calvinist Theology Library:


39 posted on 01/07/2004 7:02:54 AM PST by Gamecock (The Spirit of Piel is among us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe; Gamecock; Alex Murphy; drstevej; RnMomof7; CARepubGal
BTW, Where do you hang "soap on a rope Jesus" when you don't need that user friendly omnibelevolent anthroprocentric politically correct deity you have invented?

Woody.
40 posted on 01/07/2004 7:10:53 AM PST by CCWoody (Recognize that all true Christians will be Calvinists in glory,...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Argh! Hate it when I can't spell.
41 posted on 01/07/2004 7:14:09 AM PST by CCWoody (Recognize that all true Christians will be Calvinists in glory,...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: lockeliberty; xzins
If we are to make a "gospel is soap" analogy, then the Gospel itself is the soap. God brings man the soap and through his holy spirit he tells man that he is dirty and tells him that if he exercise a little faith and take the soap and lather up that he will be cleaned. He is asked to believe in the power of the soap to cleanse him. But men do not believe they are dirty. Even if men believe they are dirty, many refuse to use soap, thinking that they can get themselves clean without it. So they never take the soap and thus the soap is useless to them. Others may take the soap and rub it all over their body, but they still don't believe in the power of the soap and instead think that they must ritually rub soap all over themselves all the time in order to be cleaned and they never let God rinse it off and wash away the filth.

I think that ultimately it is irrelevant why someone will decide to pick up the soap and why they will lather up. The point is that unless a man picks up the soap, he will not be cleansed. God has placed the soap before you. It then becomes your responsibility to pick it up and to put the soap on your body. It is quite possible that many will actually pick up the soap, and may even pretend to put it all over their body, but they don't believe in the power of the soap, they believe in the power of themselves to get cleaned and the soap is just a step in the cleaning process and that they themselves must continually scrub themselves in order to be cleaned. Hence the soap itself just becomes additional dirt on their bodies.

But no, it is the power of the soap that brings you to the point where you can be cleaned and if you exercise a little faith and lather up believing in the power of the soap and allow God to wash you clean, then God will pour out his living water and wash you so that you will never get dirty again.

42 posted on 01/07/2004 7:17:15 AM PST by P-Marlowe (LPFOKETT GAHCOEEP-w/o*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe
Hey, Marlowe, I bet you can find that user friendly Jesus in the Virtual Church of Benevolent Dieties, Inc. It's just a guess since I couldn't find your invention in the Bible.

Perhaps, if you act now, you can be the first to come out with the "Soap on a Rope Jesus" stocking stuffers for next Christmas. And, if you are clever, you can get with the Catholics and market a few free indulgences in the special Ecumenical sham-Protestant/ not Evangelical/ Catholic gift set.

Woody.
43 posted on 01/07/2004 7:24:05 AM PST by CCWoody (Recognize that all true Christians will be Calvinists in glory,...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe
Do you remember the old cartoon short by Terry-toons (?), I think, where the automatic laundromat has the hand that reaches out, grabs the clothes, dunks them, sends them on down the line to a whole series of scrubbings, rinsings, and buffings?

I never realized that was a calvinist cartoon. :>)
44 posted on 01/07/2004 7:32:49 AM PST by xzins (Retired Army and Proud of It!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe
Take a bath with the Lord! Clean your body and soul with the Jesus-on-A-Rope! Then, when you are done with Him, simply leave Him to hang and be about your business.

Act now, and for 3 easy payments of only $9.99, you too, can join the craze which helped spark the Reformation by indulging yourself the way your Papist spiritual fathers did.




The Makers of "Jesus-on-a-Rope" are not responsible for the misuse, lack of use, or the failure to get clean of any end user. You are solely responsible for doing the work of scrubbing yourself clean. Furthermore, should you soil yourself after you are clean, you will need to reapply. There are no warranties/ guarrantees/ or covenants, either expressed or implied. If you don't die clean, then don't come crying to Us.
45 posted on 01/07/2004 7:38:57 AM PST by CCWoody (Recognize that all true Christians will be Calvinists in glory,...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: CCWoody; P-Marlowe
An just look who is doing all the work, the sinner!


46 posted on 01/07/2004 7:48:58 AM PST by Gamecock (The Spirit of Piel is among us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe
Its funny you post a simple gospel message and a lot of people just come unglued. Rather than look to the power of the gospel message itself, they look for heresies in every word nit picking every jot and tittle looking for something that they can point to as a hidden theological error and then miss the glorious picture that surrounds them.

My experience is that these sorts of objections always turn out this way.

I remember vehemently objecting to a praise/worship chorus we sang at Crusade, which contained the phrase, "My heart and flesh cry out for You, the Living God." That, I argued, flew in the face of "in my flesh there dwelleth no good thing" (Rom. 7:18). However... that phrase is almost an exact quote from Ps. 84:2. Oops....

What happened was my systematic theology had taken the place of Scripture in my mind. I believed, and still believe, in Total Depravity, so to suggest that the flesh (which I inadvertantly equated with the sinful nature -- and I'm certainly not alone) could desire God was unthinkable to me. Yet Scripture did so, and I got caught with my theological pants down.

As an aside, what can you tell me about Oklahoma's and Florida State's law schools?

47 posted on 01/07/2004 7:50:27 AM PST by jude24 ("Facts are meaningless! You can use facts to prove anything thats even REMOTELY true!" -- H. Simpson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe; xzins
For therefore we both labour and suffer reproach, because we trust in the living God, who is the Saviour of all men, specially of those that believe. (1 Tim. 4:10)

Preach it, Brethren. Press on.

48 posted on 01/07/2004 7:51:27 AM PST by Ex-Wretch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Gamecock; P-Marlowe
Cleanliness is next to Godliness.

Do you suppose that if you took the soap and cleaned someone else, sorta like a proxy Baptism, that the person that you scrubbed would also be clean? In that sense, Mormonism, Arminianism, & Catholicism aren't really all that far apart.

Woody.

P.S. Look at that shinny "facade of righteousness" halo on the guy's head.
49 posted on 01/07/2004 7:55:11 AM PST by CCWoody (Recognize that all true Christians will be Calvinists in glory,...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: nobdysfool; P-Marlowe
Unsaved men are captives to sin. As such, they CANNOT free themselves. That's why God must act first.

Then why does the Calvinist insist that before a man can be saved, that the man meditate on all his past sins prior to salvation. How is it, based on your reasoning that a man who is unsaved and cannot recognize his sins be able to meditate on them?

50 posted on 01/07/2004 7:58:54 AM PST by connectthedots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-200 ... 2,251-2,295 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson