OF COURSE EVOLUTION CANNOT EXPLAIN TO ORIGIN OF LIFE!!!! That comment was a reminder for Reubin Hick. I can assure you I'm not a party to their nonsense. Any explanation of science only invites more ridicule from them, creationists are alot like liberals, they feel threatened by any rational challenge to their views. Okay, end of rant.
Sorry, I think I posted that to you in error. You obviously are not the Scarecrow of the Oz Creationism.
Ok, I give, when did any of you Sons-of-Monkeys offer science? Just typing the word does not mean that you are employing science. OTOH, I believe I have had the exclusive franchise on introducing science into the discussion. I ask about all of those benficial mutations that are never observed (which you have to have reproducable observations in order to even enter into the arena of "science"). I ask you folks to provide science that demonstrates how dead fish can lay on the lake bottom unmolested for thousands and thousands of years slowly being covered with sediments - never decomposing, never becoming a meal for another fish, never having its bones shifted by currents. I question the sanity in expecting fruitful results from SETI - and there you have utter ridicule on parade. Come on you scientists! Where's my explanation for abiogenesis? Where's that scientific explanation for how new information gets introduced to a biological system? I want to know how you transform energy into heavy metals. How do evolutionists look at a tooth or a single bone and not only know how the complete critter looks, but also skin and hair color?
creationists are alot like liberals, they feel threatened by any rational challenge to their views
Judging by how the evolutionary lobby cries in protest over the mere thought of allowing a word of discussion of Creationism into the halls of knowledge and scientific inquiry, I would say that you and your pals are projecting.