Posted on 05/03/2005 11:04:37 PM PDT by Crackingham
The focus of the drug war in the United States has shifted significantly over the past decade from hard drugs to marijuana, which now accounts for nearly half of all drug arrests nationwide, according to an analysis of federal crime statistics released yesterday. The study of FBI data by a Washington-based think tank, the Sentencing Project, found that the proportion of heroin and cocaine cases plummeted from 55 percent of all drug arrests in 1992 to less than 30 percent 10 years later. During the same period, marijuana arrests rose from 28 percent of the total to 45 percent.
Coming in the wake of the focus on crack cocaine in the late 1980s, the increasing emphasis on marijuana enforcement was accompanied by a dramatic rise in overall drug arrests, from fewer than 1.1 million in 1990 to more than 1.5 million a decade later. Eighty percent of that increase came from marijuana arrests, the study found.
The rapid increase has not had a significant impact on prisons, however, because just 6 percent of the arrests resulted in felony convictions, the study found. The most widely quoted household survey on the topic has shown relatively little change in the overall rate of marijuana use over the same time period, experts said.
"In reality, the war on drugs as pursued in the 1990s was to a large degree a war on marijuana," said Ryan S. King, the study's co-author and a research associate at the Sentencing Project. "Marijuana is the most widely used illegal substance, but that doesn't explain this level of growth over time. . . . The question is, is this really where we want to be spending all our money?"
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...
Our tax dollars at work...
The War On Drugs is a joke ...Just an excuse to expand the police state web ...
Marijuana cases are easy to make and typically don't end in a shoot-out, generally don't involve people going to prison and they translate into nice fines and forfeitures for the local governments. It's a win-win-win for the government. Furthermore, in many states, even a misdemeanor drug conviction prevents one from ever owning a firearm, so there's the added benefit of removing weapons from the citizenry.
In our slip 'n' slide ride to becoming a socialist state, the war on drugs is working almost as nicely as Jimmy Carter's federal Department of Edumacation.
Put that in your pipe and smoke it.
It's easier to go after non-felony shipments of smelly, bulky, domestically produced MJ. The "increased focus" allows more free time to snack on donuts and coffee.


Shouldn,t this be posted in the RLC Liberty Caucus? 'Cuz I don't think anyone else gives a rip!
LOL! When American pimples wake up to the fact that the WOD is a moral and social disaster then, perhaps, the political hacks we elect will spend our tax dollars wisely.
Until then....enjoy the futility of the WOD..
You are wrong. The mullahs want drugs to be illegal so they can continue profit from the high drug prices.
Not surprising. Marijuana Prohibition is the foundation of the Drug War. As the rest of the world abandons the U.S.-style Drug War, our leaders must crack down to keep the gravy train rolling.
Libertarian ping.To be added or removed from my ping list freepmail me or post a message here.
If you don't give a rip, then why bother to bitch? If you care to add something, feel free. If you want to sit on the sidelines and troll, go back under your bridge!
There are 200,000+ armed federal agents of all types.
70%+ of criminal case wiretaps are for drug cases.
Drug cases are the bulk of the prison population.
Local PDs are the #2 tax-eater in town, right after the pubik skoolz.
If you pay taxes, you ought to care, even if you have not inhaled since the '70s.
Nazis are as Nazis do.
This article/study makes one wonder about all of those other studies that proclaim marijuana use is down.
Arrests are up, but use is down...hmmmmm...

How would mullahs profit from marijuana being legal? Most all of the pot consumed in America is produced in Mexico. Almost all of the rest is produced here, in Canada, and in other countries south of the border. Some from Jamaica finds it's way here, and a little tiny bit of hash from the middle east makes it here. If it was legal here almost all would be produced here unless other countries legalized too and it was imported like other agricultural products. In any event, legal or not, middle easterners are not making a lot of money in the American marijuana markets. What is consumed here comes almost exclusively from the Americas and surrounding islands, mostly from Mexico.
I wasn't talking about pot but drugs in general to someone who seems to suggest that drug legalization is preferred by the mullahs.
Great picture! never seen it before. thanks for posting it.
"I wasn't talking about pot but drugs in general to someone who seems to suggest that drug legalization is preferred by the mullahs"
Actually I was just being silly. ;)
the thing about this article that got me was the increase in arrests for non dealing......except in my hometown of Northern VA.......
Actually, the number one supplier to the U.S. is the U.S. I guess "Buy American!" caught on in at least one marketplace.
Dope heads are all alike. They think taking away their dope is a constitutional infringement. I guess that's why they're dope heads.
How anybody can claim to be a 'conservative' and believe in Judeo-Christian values and still advocate dope usage is insane.
Where does the Constitution delegate power to the Federal government in intrastate drug policies, in your opinion?
So you want to go there, do you?
First of all, which state has legalized marijuana use?
Second, if you believe so much in states rights, where do you stand on The War for Southern Independence?
"How anybody can claim to be a 'conservative' and believe in Judeo-Christian values and still advocate dope usage is insane."
What do you think you are conserving? Not the Constitution! Not Liberty!
How does any believer in Judeo-Christian values advocating waging war
upon our own citizenry for possessing, propagating or protecting a gift
from the garden of God? How do you advocate taking someone's children
or property for merely possessing a flower?
"Can the liberties of a nation be thought secure when we have removed their only firm basis, a conviction in the minds of the people that these liberties are of the gift of God?" --Thomas Jefferson: Notes on Virginia, 1782.
GOD MADE HERB
GOD SAW THAT IT WAS GOOD
GOD GAVE IT TO MAN
Genesis 1:11
Then God said, "Let the earth bring forth grass, the herb that yields seed, and the fruit tree that yields fruit according to its kind, whose seed is in itself, on the earth"; and it was so.
Genesis 1:12
And the earth brought forth grass, the herb that yields seed according to its kind, and the tree that yields fruit, whose seed is in itself according to its kind. And God saw that it was good.
Genesis 1:29
And God said, "See, I have given you every herb that yields seed which is on the face of all the earth, and every tree whose fruit yields seed; to you it shall be for food.
Some seem to believe that an herb given by God to man and beast alike at the beginning of time and which has grown freely almost everywhere, including here long before our nation was formed, is permissibly eradicable or controllable by the federal government through powers granted by the interstate commerce clause of the Constitution. In light of the rest of the Constitution any such insanely perceived mandate dissolves into a delusion of grandeur amounting to the deification of the state.
"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal; that they are endowed by their
Creator with inherent and inalienable rights; that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of
happiness."
Preamble: ...secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity...
Amendment V: nor shall (anyone) be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.
Amendment IX: The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the PEOPLE.
Amendment X: The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the PEOPLE.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof
Nowhere in the Constitution is it enumerated what one may put into ones body. Therefore, that right is reserved for the states or the people. However,
since God has already specified in the Bible what one may consume, it is, in fact, the Peoples God given right.
Ephesians 6:12 For we wrestle not against flesh and blood,
but against principalities,
against powers, against the rulers
of the darkness of this world,
against spiritual wickedness in high places.
Learn to read__________"OR TO THE PEOPLE"
"...declaring war against the natural rights of all mankind, and extirpating the defenders thereof from the face of the earth, is the concern of every man to whom nature hath given the power of feeling" Thomas Paine from 'Common Sense'
First of all, which state has legalized marijuana use?
Alaska for personal posession in the home of up to 3 ounces, IIRC. Other States have approved it for medical use under State law.
Second, if you believe so much in states rights, where do you stand on The War for Southern Independence?
As I read the US Constitution from 1860, a State had the power to secede, IMO.
Now, where do you think the Constitution delegates power to the Federal government in intrastate drug policies?
Production isn't all. The sales, trafficking, etc. is in large part done by people more unsavory than the ones peddling at the street. I bet you terrorists take a huge chunk of the trafficking profit because there is money for them and they are already high risk-takers so they are natural candidates for that job.
I'm against the Drug War. I would also support peaceful secession of any state, if that is the will of the people.
Remember, the Drug War is 90% of the reason for there being 200,000+ armed federal agents. How do you propose to change that without ending the Drug War?
When is the last time someone was murdered over a beer distributorship? Why do you think those murders stopped?
Preaching to the choir.
Well, the Bible supports slavery. Where do you stand on that?
I will sell your sons and your daughters to the Judians, and they shall in turn sell them to the Sabeans, to a people far off. Joel 3:8
Slaves obey your master." Colossians 3:22
And many more.
Are you for the legalization of recreational drug use?
I would also support peaceful secession of any state, if that is the will of the people.
That's good to know. We'll count on you when the time comes.
Remember, the Drug War is 90% of the reason for there being 200,000+ armed federal agents. How do you propose to change that without ending the Drug War?
Do you really think that if the War on Drugs were to stop that these federal agents would simply go away?
"Dope heads will drag up any quote, even try to use Biblical justification, to support their dope smoking lifestyle."
Drug warriors. too, will use Biblical quotes or even baseless 'morality' to justify the tyranny of their warrior lifestyle. They think they are my God and my father yet they end up my Pilate, but the blood stains will not wash from their hands.
We are all slaves and to deny it is futile.
We win a war now and become slaves to
those we defeat for generations instead
of enslaving those we free from tyranny
with the blood of our children and our
hard earned tax dollars which should be
providing for our social security. We are
slaves to the 100% of our nations growth
encompassed in a mass invasion of illegal
immigrants that have not payed into the
social security system for their entire lives.
We are slaves to failing government socialism.
Are you going to answer where you think the Constitution delegates power to the Federal government in intrastate drug policies?
"How anybody can claim to be a 'conservative' and believe in Judeo-Christian values and still advocate dope usage is insane."
Romans 14: 2 For one believeth that he may eat all things: another, who is weak, eateth herbs. 3 Let not him that eateth despise him that eateth not; and let not him which eateth not judge him that eateth: for God hath received him.
If you want to get high and sodomize your buddy, go ahead. But don't ask the rest of us to sanction these acts through legalization of recreational drug use and same sex marriage.
Uunless you are teatotal, you are a hypocrit. Far more violence and debauchery takes place in drunkeness, and far more addiction is to alcohol than to any other drug. Pick up a magazine aimed at gay men and count the ads for liquor.
The last bastion of free enterprise.
That went by the wayside along with the Articles of the Constitution.
More likely a DU troll trying to make people think that holding Judeo-Christian values makes you too dumb to understand the Constitution.
Hanging on to the New Deal's living document Commerce Clause in order to make it a federal crime is getting pretty far down the stupid scale, too.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.