Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

FR Debate: Intelligent Design vs. Birth Defects, Can They Be Reconciled?
Discovery Health & Multiple Medical Sites ^ | 11/11/05

Posted on 11/11/2005 4:47:36 PM PST by Wolfstar

Each year in the United States, about 150,000 babies are born with birth defects ranging from mild to life threatening. While progress has been made in the detection and treatment of birth defects, they remain the leading cause of death in the first year of life. Birth defects are often the result of genetic and environmental factors, but the causes of well over half of all birth defects are currently unknown.

Following is a partial list of birth defects:

Achondroplasia/Dwarfism

Hemochromatosis

Alpha-1 Antitrypsin Deficiency

Huntington's Disease

Anencephaly

Hydrocephalus

Arnold-Chiari Malformation

Klinefelter's Syndrome

Ataxia Telangiectasia

Leukodystrophies

Blood coagulation disorders/Hemophilia

Marfan Syndrome

Brain malformations/genetic brain disorders

Metabolic disorders

Canavan Disease

Muscular Dystrophy

Cancer: Neonatal, newborn, infant and childhood

Neural tube defects/Spina Bifida

Cerebral Palsy

Neurofibromatosis

Cleft lip and palate

Niemann-Pick Disease

Club foot/club hand

Osteogenesis Imperfecta (brittle bone disease)

Congenital heart disease

Phenylketonuria

Conjoined twins

Prader-Willi Syndrome

Cystic Fibrosis

Progeria (advanced aging in children)

Down Syndrome

Sickle Cell Anemia

Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome

Spinal Muscular Atrophy

Eye, ear and speech defects

Tay-Sachs Disease

Fragile X Syndrome

Tuberous Sclerosis

Gaucher's Disease

Turner's Syndrome

Genital and urinary tract defects

Wilson's Disease

Some birth/genetic defects, such as near-sightedness, are mild and do not affect the person's ability to lead a normal life. Others are so severe that the person has no chance to even live. Efficiency and economy are part of intelligently designed systems. If the "design" of human systems is so intelligent, why do tragic inefficiencies such as the following occur at all? Warning, the linked photos are graphic medical images, and are very, very sad.

Conjoined twins, i.e., monozygous twinning in which there is fusion of the twins. The popular term is "Siamese" twins. This happens when identical twin embryos become fused together during the very early stages of development. Conjoined twins occur in an estimated one in 200,000 births, with approximately half being stillborn. Here are links to three photos of severely conjoined twins:

Photo 1: one head, two bodies

Photo 2: essentially one torso between two babies

Photo 3: profound fusion

Neural tube defects are are one of the more common congenital anomalies. Such defects result from improper embryonic neural tube closure. The most minimal defect is called spina bifida, with failure of the vertebral body to completely form, but the defect is not open. Open neural tube defects with lack of a skin covering, can include a meningocele, in which meninges protrude through the defect. Here is a link to a severe neural tube defect.

Photo 4

Defects of the head/brain: In the linked photo a large encephalocele that merges with the scalp above is protruding from the back of the head. The encephalocele extends down to partially cover a rachischisis on the back. This baby also has a retroflexed head from iniencephaly.

Photo 5

The form of neural tube defect in the next linked photo is known as exencephaly. The cranial vault is not completely present, but a brain is present because it was not completely exposed to amniotic fluid. Such an event is very rare. It may be part of craniofacial clefts associated with the limb-body wall complex, which results from early amnion disruption.

Photo 6

Congenital and pediatric neoplasms: One type that can occur is a teratoma. The next linked photo shows a large nasopharyngeal teratoma that is protruding from the oral cavity.

Photo 7

Tumors: In the next linked photo there is a large mass involving the left upper arm and left chest of the baby. This congenital neoplasm turned out to be a lymphangioma. This baby and the one in Photo 9 were essentially riddled with cancer before birth and shortly afterwards.

Photo 8

Next is a gross neuroblastoma arising in the right adrenal gland. It is the most common pediatric malignancy in infancy, and 75% of cases are diagnosed in children less than 4 years old. These tumors most often present as an abdominal or mediastinal mass.

Photo 9


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: birth; crevolist; defects; design; genetic; intelligent; klinefeltersyndrome; kyrieelieson; philosophy; religion; theology
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 401-415 next last
If the cases shown in the above-linked photos are examples of "intelligent design," then the question has to be asked: To what purpose?

Such cases are not just tragic, but extremely cruel. They not only argue against "intelligent design," but also are capable of shaking one's faith in religion.

1 posted on 11/11/2005 4:47:38 PM PST by Wolfstar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Admin Moderator

Thank you for the advice. I think it works this way. I also think this is an important debate to have.


2 posted on 11/11/2005 4:48:40 PM PST by Wolfstar (Whatever happened to "These Colors Don't Run?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wolfstar

Reality in general cannot be reconciled with intelligent design.


3 posted on 11/11/2005 4:49:25 PM PST by AntiGuv (™)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wolfstar
This is like comparing I-10 from 10,000 feet in an Airplane and a Pothole with a wide angle lense from 2 feet.

Dumbest way to start an argument that I have ever seen, but hey it's your nickel.

TT
4 posted on 11/11/2005 4:51:15 PM PST by TexasTransplant (NEMO ME IMPUNE LACESSET)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wolfstar

I doubt these images, as horrible as they are, really shake anyone's beliefs in God or Intelligent Design. These cases you show are exceptions, not the rule.

All I can say is that if this is the best you can do it is pretty sad.


5 posted on 11/11/2005 4:51:22 PM PST by trashcanbred (Anti-social and anti-socialist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AntiGuv
Reality in general cannot be reconciled with intelligent design.

I agree, but am interested in philosophical underpinnings of those who believe in intelligent design.

6 posted on 11/11/2005 4:52:20 PM PST by Wolfstar (Whatever happened to "These Colors Don't Run?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Wolfstar

These clear examples of the effect of sin and corruption of the original design resulting from man's rebellion against God (Genesis 3)


7 posted on 11/11/2005 4:54:44 PM PST by LiteKeeper (Beware the secularization of America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wolfstar

"For now we see through a glass, darkly; but then face to face: now I know in part; but then shall I know even as also I am known." - 1 Cor 13:12


8 posted on 11/11/2005 4:55:08 PM PST by Rightwing Conspiratr1 (Lock-n-load!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wolfstar

Wrong!

Your arguments are exactly why intelligent design is a must.

Your "science" supposes that these lives are worthless. You provide photos so that the aesthetics can govern our rationality. These are not humans-- but monsters. Therefore, we should allow our human discernment to kill them prior to birth and more importantly fully engage the "moral" task of sorting the strong from the weak.

No aspect of physical deformity or defect can demean the metaphysical commitments of valuing human life. The intellectual war against intelligent design is a war to rationalize human life. Showing us shocking pictures of deformed humanity will not do it.

You are not god nor are any of your rational censorship loving pals. We are endowed by our creator-- even if you don't like our looks.


9 posted on 11/11/2005 4:55:19 PM PST by lonestar67
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasTransplant
Dumbest way to start an argument that I have ever seen, but hey it's your nickel.

Not interested in an argument, but a discussion. It's unfortunate that you consider an attempt to explore the question "dumb." In any case, for the "dumb" among us, would you care to expand on your analogy?

10 posted on 11/11/2005 4:55:20 PM PST by Wolfstar (Whatever happened to "These Colors Don't Run?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Wolfstar

I think everything in life is capable of shaking your faith of God's existance. But in a way, that's the point. You have to find God of your own accord, especially in the difficult times.

Loving God and having faith doesn't mean that life is perfect, no matter what the Oprah-Televangelists tell you.. The early martyrs of the Church are a perfectly good example of that.


11 posted on 11/11/2005 4:56:37 PM PST by Aggie Mama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wolfstar
"They not only argue against "intelligent design," but also are capable of shaking one's faith in religion."

This appears to be along the same lines as "why does God allow natural disasters to occur". Where in the Christian faith are we promised a perfect Earthly existence? I think this is just a veiled attempt at ridicule. No surprise there though.
12 posted on 11/11/2005 4:56:49 PM PST by Texas_Jarhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wolfstar

From mankind's perspective, these things are bad. So are hungry wolves and bears if you're in the woods with them. God's ways are not our ways. We will never understand everything He allows.


13 posted on 11/11/2005 4:57:14 PM PST by zeeba neighba (no crocs!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: trashcanbred
These cases you show are exceptions, not the rule.

The issues not that they are exceptions, but that they exist at all. Mild genetic (birth) defects such as near-sightedness are extremely common. If we are meant to see, why are so many of us born with the defect?

We need teeth to eat, and yet our teeth are poorly designed and rot easily. Why?

14 posted on 11/11/2005 4:57:31 PM PST by Wolfstar (Whatever happened to "These Colors Don't Run?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Wolfstar

ID assumes purpose. It might be that a perfect specimen exists nowhere, ever, nor would the existence of a perfect specimen be part of the purpose. Not one perfect specimen of anything. If there is a perfection, there can be only one.


15 posted on 11/11/2005 4:57:35 PM PST by RightWhale (Repeal the law of the excluded middle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Junior

Archival ping (marginal).


16 posted on 11/11/2005 4:58:31 PM PST by PatrickHenry (Expect no response if you're a troll, lunatic, retard, or incurable ignoramus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: LiteKeeper
These clear examples of the effect of sin and corruption of the original design resulting from man's rebellion against God (Genesis 3)

It's difficult to tell from words alone how to take such a statement. If you mean the statement to be taken literally, then I would say that's an awfully cruel god you believe in.

17 posted on 11/11/2005 4:59:03 PM PST by Wolfstar (Whatever happened to "These Colors Don't Run?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Wolfstar

I think that the design is wonderful-I also think the design can be corrupted by external forces,such as chemicals in the food chain,background radiation,and who knows what else.All this has no effect on my faith.


18 posted on 11/11/2005 4:59:25 PM PST by Farmer Dean (Every time a toilet flushes,another liberal gets his brains.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wolfstar
I agree, but am interested in philosophical underpinnings of those who believe in intelligent design.

Well, "Intelligent Design" is nonsense, but your illustration above is just another variation on the 'Problem of Evil' (i.e., how can God be all-powerful, all-knowing, all-good and yet permit evil to exist). The short answer is that if an all-powerful, all-knowing God exists then he isn't all-good by our standards.

19 posted on 11/11/2005 4:59:35 PM PST by AntiGuv (™)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Wolfstar
then I would say that's an awfully cruel god you believe in.

Allright. Now we have the stated reason for the thread.

20 posted on 11/11/2005 5:00:21 PM PST by zeeba neighba (no crocs!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 401-415 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson