Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

If 100 million guys can make all, what do other do?

Posted on 01/12/2010 5:01:31 AM PST by QF129

Decades ago, people had to work hard for making products for living and for fun. Outsourcing and globalization have changed it at all. If 100 million guys in China, India or Vietnam can make goods for the world, what should other guys do?

One way is to limit the globolization process so that more guys are in work because the productivity is reduced; otherwise people may accept this and just do exactly nothing. Before we achieve another techonological breakthrough like nuclear power or the Internet, we must find a way to deal with the high productivity that is making troubles. If people do not need achievement to satisfy themselves, the thing is much easier.

Another concern is that globolization may enlarge the a poverty gap in developed countries because labour forces is worth less and capital is worth more products.


TOPICS: Heated Discussion
KEYWORDS: globalization; outsourcing
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last

1 posted on 01/12/2010 5:01:31 AM PST by QF129
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: QF129

Oh, that’s a great solution—let’s limit productivity and make the whole world poorer!


2 posted on 01/12/2010 5:03:08 AM PST by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: QF129

Welcome newbie. Do you think that the 100 million people are going to pay all the taxes for the other 5 billion deadbeats?


3 posted on 01/12/2010 5:04:31 AM PST by caver (Obama's first goals: allow more killing of innocents and allow the killers of innocents to go free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: QF129
WelcomeTo FreeRepublic!
4 posted on 01/12/2010 5:08:28 AM PST by ButThreeLeftsDo (FR... Monthly donors welcome!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: QF129

Limiting productivity is a lousy idea. As always, we will have to be more innovative.

SnakeDoc


5 posted on 01/12/2010 5:11:44 AM PST by SnakeDoctor (Life is tough; it's tougher if you're stupid. -- John Wayne)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: QF129

The rest of us can do things like manage the logistics of shipping those goods around the world, managing and maintaining the infrastructure that makes the manufacture of those goods possible, manage the data infrastructure that makes that “global economy” viable, and run the businesses that make and sell those goods. Beyond that, there are many many more jobs possible in the field of investing in those businesses to make them more successful etc etc.

Where’d you learn economics? From a gumball machine?


6 posted on 01/12/2010 5:13:13 AM PST by Little Pig (Vi Veri Veniversum Vivus Vici.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: QF129
If 100 million guys can make all, what do other do?

Post inane crap on FR, I guess?

7 posted on 01/12/2010 5:15:59 AM PST by sam_paine (X .................................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: QF129
You signed up yesterday to post this dreck?

You should take an on line writing class.

8 posted on 01/12/2010 5:18:23 AM PST by South Hawthorne (In Memory of my Dear Friend Henry Lee II)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: QF129
We could drink beer and play golf.

ML/NJ

9 posted on 01/12/2010 5:21:28 AM PST by ml/nj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: QF129

If 100 million guys can make all, what do other do?....

Hang around the town and protest in the streets daily, just like in the Muslim Countries.


10 posted on 01/12/2010 5:22:43 AM PST by Hang'emAll
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 9YearLurker

The idea that the ability to produce basically an unlimited supply of goods was proposed as a cause for the Great Depression after it truly got underway. Those advocating this idea that industrial science in the 20s got too far ahead of the public’s ability to purchase enough of the goods that were being produced leading to business failure and the depression.


11 posted on 01/12/2010 5:23:19 AM PST by AceMineral (Manos? Hands of Fate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: QF129
The Left has been pushing variations of this crap forever.

Once upon a time, the big problem was dirty, noisy dangerous factories. The Left was really opposed to that! Then factory owners moved toward automation and freed workers to get jobs that weren't so dirty, noisy or dangerous. Hey, guess what? The Left was really opposed to that!

I think in the ideal Leftist world, the Political Elite would all live in castles on the hill and live a sex positive lifestyle. This would all be supported by a core group of slaves who would labor in the fields producing massive amounts of goods through highly productive labor.

But we've tried feudalism before, and most of us have moved past it.

12 posted on 01/12/2010 5:29:11 AM PST by ClearCase_guy (We have the 1st so that we can call on people to rebel. We have 2nd so that they can.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: QF129

Nuclear power was a bad example, because it actually raised the human cost of producing power, while lowering the material cost. (it takes more people to run a nuclear plant than a coal-fired plant).

Theoretically, if 1 person could do the work of 10, that one person would earn 10 times as much money as the 10, but it would be useless because the other 9 would be broke and couldn’t buy anything.

So the market would adjust, continuing to employ the 10 people, but each working 1/10th of the time. Everybody ends up with the same amount of money as before, and all have money to spend.

Except what you really expect to happen is that the cost of the goods drops to 1/10th, the 1 person makes the same money as he did before, but the other 9 are broke and can’t buy anything.

But the other 9, not being lazy democrats, will go out and find a way to make something else. And the 1 guy with money will want to buy those other things, and that will employ the 9 other people, and there will be 10 times as many things.

So long as the growth in productivity is slow, and we have enough room in our houses, or we can think up enough new really cool and expensive toys, everything will be fine.

However, the downside of a consumer-pleasure-driven economy is that it is pretty easy for people to go without when things are tough. Which means downturns can be much more severe.

I don’t see any major economists talking about this, but during the great depression, we were still a pretty serious “needs” economy, and people have needs (food, clothing, shelter) even if they don’t have money, so they will do whatever it takes to get it.

But how many people need a big-screen TV, or a satellite dish, or a $50,000 car, or a trip to the Bahamas, or a $2000 stereo, or a $3000 chair that gives you back massages?

but that is what drives out market these days. In fact, what you suggest is already what happened. It used to take a significant portion of our population just to grow enough food for everybody. But as we got much more efficient at growing food, all those unemployed farmers left the farm and built entire industries of products and services.


13 posted on 01/12/2010 5:29:54 AM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: QF129

Could this title be Harry Reid approved?


14 posted on 01/12/2010 5:41:44 AM PST by LRS (Just contracts; just laws; just a constitution...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ml/nj

I’ll serve the beer! I can do that.


15 posted on 01/12/2010 5:47:23 AM PST by Beer Serving Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ButThreeLeftsDo; QF129

highlight the part where it says to use vanity tags


16 posted on 01/12/2010 5:50:53 AM PST by Revelation 911 (How many 100's of 1000's of our servicemen died so we would never bow to a king?" -freeper pnh102)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Beer Serving Girl
I see that you are new here. Welcome to FR.

My recollection is that when one has a screen name such as yours, the longstanding rules require you to post a picture on your FR "about page" so all may determine your qualifications.

ML/NJ

17 posted on 01/12/2010 6:00:28 AM PST by ml/nj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: QF129

IBTZ!


18 posted on 01/12/2010 6:03:06 AM PST by PA Engineer (Liberate America from the occupation media.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Is it too early to submit nominations for Stupidest Post of the Year?


19 posted on 01/12/2010 6:10:17 AM PST by Hawthorn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: QF129

<iwe must find a way to deal with the high productivity that is making troubles. If people do not need achievement to satisfy themselves, the thing is much easier./ip

Obama’s people are working on that.


20 posted on 01/12/2010 6:13:37 AM PST by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson