Skip to comments.Letter: Angry indeed — at candidates who kowtow to Tea Party
Posted on 09/28/2010 7:11:00 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
IT SEEMS the only voters who matter this election season are the angry voters (Mass. may lose its clout in House, Page A1, Sept. 26). Heres my question: Do you only count as a so-called angry voter if you are willing to vote for a lunatic like Christine ODonnell in Delaware? This is not fair.
I consider myself a card-carrying angry voter. I am angry about wars being started for fake reasons that cause thousands of real deaths; I am angry about an economy that relies on corporate greed, even when it is practically destroyed by that greed, causing untold harm to untold millions; I am really, really angry that every morning I must read about Sarah Palin as if she has the right to matter, as if her dimwittedness is anything more than a cover for the politics of supreme selfishness...
(Excerpt) Read more at boston.com ...
Hystrionic leftist having a hissy fit temper tantrum.
Some real B****** S*****.
As someone told me two years ago: “Get over it.”
I’m sure the writer enjoys brie with that whine.
Sounds like somebody needs their Huggie changed.
What are they bitchin about.....Hussein is a socialist genius. Doesn’t that fit their spot of taxed tea in the morning...
Good gawd 2DV!
You’ve been dumpster diving!
J. Halprin.....what a wimp!
As someone told me two years ago: Get over it.
They were that nice? I remember hearing “We won, so sit down and shut up!”
So... they need to sit down and shut up. :D
I loves me a histrionic cat nickname, especially a Masshole.
One lump or two?
Just buck up and pay my taxes and make the gov't leave me alone.
Halprin is a IDIOT! So why didn’t Ozero end the WAR????
Tears of a clown!
Me? I'm getting angrier at the welfare parasites in America exceeding 50% and whining that they're not getting enough Obama money...
you mean like using the police power of the government to seize property from private citizens and order them to live as YOU tell them to?
I’ll crash this Globe thread with a Howie Carr link
Because this Globe letter writer is a ....Moonbat!
Howie Carr on Moonbats (from 2008)
For those who came in late, moonbats are trust-funded, medicated, middle-aged, white-guilt-ridden blogging lefty losers who inflicted Deval Patrick upon the working people. The moonbats now yearn to elect Sen. Barack Obama, a Deval on steroids.
If you are a guy with a ponytail, chances are you’re a moonbat if you have a wide-brim leather hat too, the odds rise to 100 percent. If you’re a woman and you bring knitting to public meetings, consider yourself positively ID’ed.
Other indications that you could be a moonbat include:
You’ve used the word “Halliburton” at least once in the last 10 minutes.
You take part in the weekly anti-war protests on the town post office with all the other grandmothers, or should I say the women who would be grandmothers if they hadn’t had so many abortions 30 years ago.
You scoff at people who believe in God, but just as fervently believe that there is a “scientific consensus” about global warming.
You’d never admit that the reason you don’t care about Obama’s plans to tax the middle class back to the Stone Age is because your dad down in New York put all your trust funds into tax-free municipal bonds.
You have both of Barack Obama’s books, and you’ve been meaning to get around to reading them, but
You haven’t uttered the word “Christmas” since 1983, lest you offend someone.
Forget vegetarian, you’d like to be a vegan except for that no-ice-cream thing.
Actually, “voter anger” and “anti-incumbent sentiment” are just code words the leftist media uses to avoid discussing real issues. They won’t even begin to consider why voters might be angry, nor for that matter why said voters might want to get rid of their incumbents. So they just avoid the question altogether and make the issue about some silly sentimentality.
My response posted in the Boston edition of the New York Globe: Mr. Halprin is a misogynist. Who talks that way to women? I think Democrat men are little cowards, who aren’t worthy to debate a woman like Sarah Palin or Hillary Rodham Clinton. We know because we watched you seethe with fear and anger against Clinton two years ago, just as you pantywaists wet yourself whenever you quake when Palin is on TV.
Get a set, you quivering dandies.
This is the kind of crap the newspapers will publish as “enlightened” and “well-thought”. But let somene write a letter castigating government(s) for refusing to allow the military their right to vote, as I did, and it is either “too controversial” or it is “antagonistic”. Somehow, these letters get “lost”.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.