Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Aspiring presidential Michele Bachmann sad throwback to 50's America (Spew-tastic)
The Montreal Gazette ^ | August 18, 2011 | Janet Bagnall

Posted on 08/18/2011 8:02:31 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

Forty years ago, women in North America began a sustained and organized protest against entrenched interests that denied them equal opportunity in the workplace, equal pay and the right to be taken seriously as candidates for public office.

The backlash was immediate and furious: Women didn't deserve to be paid as much as men. Their natural talents confined them to teaching and nursing. They were not smart enough, well-informed enough or tough enough to run for public office.

If Michele Bachmann had emerged 40 years ago, it would have felt like the Old Boys who ran the world had a point.

Bigoted and uninformed, Bachmann could have served as Exhibit A for the inherent unsuitability of women for high, or even low, public office.

But if the last 40 years have proved anything, it's that women are supremely capable in the workplace, at school and in public office. So why among thousands upon thousands of educated, competent, knowledgeable women in the United States is Bachmann being taken seriously as a candidate for a presidential nomination?

Precisely because she represents a vision of 1950s America that is untouched by modern life, with its sexual and reproductive freedoms, the influx of minority populations right into the heartland of the U.S., and the need to adapt to an increasingly globalized world.

But Bachmann, 55, the mother of five children, has managed to appeal to both a rural constituency that views big-city American life with distrust verging on horror and people in the big cities who can help fund her run.

To moneyed fundraisers, she's the promise of deregulation and tax breaks, a standard-issue conservative Republican in the mould of George W. Bush.

To her rural Christian base, she's a social conservative, one of them.

They understand her when she acts on their behalf in ways that appear, on the surface, dumb.

In 2003, when the Minnesota state legislature had already passed a law making same-sex unions illegal, Bachmann nonetheless proposed an amendment to the state constitution banning gay marriage.

It was a move that could be interpreted in a number of ways: she hadn't bothered to see what was already law; she didn't care; the real point was to call attention to herself as a fearless campaigner against any deviation from a Bible-based, 1950s suburban/rural American norm.

Two years later, Bachmann was claiming that God had called her to run for the Minnesota Senate. Two years after that, she suggested on television that the media should look at the views of people in Congress and find out, as she put it, "Are they pro-America or anti-America?"

It's relevant that this person who claims divine intervention and who calls into question the patriotism of her country's top elected officials is a woman.

It also mattered that it was Sarah Palin who as Republican vice-presidential candidate veered close to racism in the 2008 presidential campaign against Barack Obama.

These two women may appear to be serious candidates, but they aren't. They allow themselves a margin of error and lack of judgment that a serious candidate couldn't afford to.

They don't represent women.

They don't represent their potential constituents, other than a small, narrow sliver of fundamentalist Christians whose views would startle most of their neighbours if they knew about them.

Their job is to jam a stick in the wheel of progress. They oppose feminism, ignoring the obvious point that they themselves are out working, making money and influencing the public agenda, activities that it took a women's rights movement to open up for women.

Frustration with women like Michele Bachmann and Sarah Palin is leading to lapses in judgment like the bizarre photo of Bachmann on the cover of a recent issue of Newsweek.

Making her look like some form of alien life undermines legitimate complaints about her views and rightly allows her to claim she is a victim of sexist coverage. Texas Governor Rick Perry, who is also running for the Republican presidential nomination and whose views compete for extremism and idiocy with Bachmann's, gets off lightly by comparison.

Because there are still so few women in public life, Bachmann's campaign could end up undermining women's hard-fought gains — and not because other women don't care. Bachmann is against reproductive freedom, but most women aren't. Bachmann doesn't want the state to interfere in the private sector, but most women are quite willing to have the state order companies to pay them the same amount of money as their male colleagues. Michele Bachmann may not take other women seriously, but it would be a big mistake for them to return the favour.


TOPICS: Heated Discussion
KEYWORDS: 2012; bachmann; canada; feminists; homosexuals; manhaters; misogamists; palin
So there are some Canadians more obtuse than Europeans?
1 posted on 08/18/2011 8:02:40 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Female misogynist. Sad.


2 posted on 08/18/2011 8:10:02 PM PDT by Still Thinking (Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Bigoted and uninformed, Bachmann could have served as Exhibit A for the inherent unsuitability of women for high, or even low, public office.

As long as the Canadians have Annie Linteau as the RCMP spokesperson, they cannot insult capabilities or intelligence of any female public figures in the US.

3 posted on 08/18/2011 8:10:18 PM PDT by edpc (Ruck Famadan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
It was a move that could be interpreted in a number of ways: she hadn't bothered to see what was already law; she didn't care; the real point was to call attention to herself as a fearless campaigner against any deviation from a Bible-based, 1950s suburban/rural American norm.

Sounds good to me.

4 posted on 08/18/2011 8:10:26 PM PDT by Inyo-Mono (My greatest fear is that when I'm gone my wife will sell my guns for what I told her I paid for them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
This sounds more like the French Canadian elite ~ currently their standard for family life is to just have sex with their women but not marry them.

At the slightest sign of family stress they either kick the women in the street or move out.

Really can't take comments from Quebec males as being legitimate.

5 posted on 08/18/2011 8:11:47 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Bigoted and uninformed, Bachmann could have served as Exhibit A for the inherent unsuitability of women for high, or even low, public office.

Such name calling without making a single argument precludes me from taking any thing else in the "article" seriously.
6 posted on 08/18/2011 8:11:54 PM PDT by andyk (Income != Wealth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Bigoted and uninformed, Bachmann could have served as Exhibit A for the inherent unsuitability of women for high, or even low, public office.

Such name calling without making a single argument precludes me from taking any thing else in the "article" seriously.
7 posted on 08/18/2011 8:13:29 PM PDT by andyk (Income != Wealth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Unlike Michele, they don’t understand the threat of the Soviet Union.


8 posted on 08/18/2011 8:20:58 PM PDT by trumandogz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: andyk
Such name calling without making a single argument precludes me from taking any thing else in the "article" seriously.

You are restricting your acceptance to logical arguments. The author IS making a leftist argument. Name calling is a valid leftist argumment and to a leftist, that is sufficient. The ends justifies the means.

9 posted on 08/18/2011 8:22:04 PM PDT by 17th Miss Regt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

They’re frantic. If the Left loses any more women to the Right, all they’ll have between them and total elimination will be gays and minorities.

They MUST destroy the conservative women who would lead others from the wet nurse state.


10 posted on 08/18/2011 8:22:09 PM PDT by MNnice (Showing fresh signs of liberalitis, the strain of the orbital muscles due to excessive eye rolling)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Bigoted and uninformed, Bachmann could have served as Exhibit A for the inherent unsuitability of women for high, or even low, public office.

You mean as compared to the genius of Obama?
The man who said "today the Earth begins to heal, and the oceans start to recede".
The post racial president?
The smartest man in the world?

11 posted on 08/18/2011 8:26:16 PM PDT by oldbrowser (They're socialists don't call them liberals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz

oooooo....You are bad. Wait ‘til they figure out what you just said. ROFL.


12 posted on 08/18/2011 8:26:37 PM PDT by MestaMachine (If the truth hurts, prepare yourself for a LOT of pain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Aw geez! We’re back in the smoky backroom again!


13 posted on 08/18/2011 8:28:48 PM PDT by MestaMachine (If the truth hurts, prepare yourself for a LOT of pain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

The ‘50s were great. The clowns were on children’s television instead of in the White House.


14 posted on 08/18/2011 8:33:29 PM PDT by reg45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #15 Removed by Moderator

To: oldbrowser
The pmost racial president?
16 posted on 08/18/2011 8:36:50 PM PDT by reg45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
The writer doesn't seem to understand the US political system all that well when he talks about the constitutional amendment she proposed. (If the legislature passed a law, you couldn't possibly need a constitutional amendment addressing the same issue, now could you?)

I found the article rather narrow-minded. I also get really, really tired of Christians and/or conservatives being treated like some sort of lunatic fringe.

17 posted on 08/18/2011 8:46:33 PM PDT by susannah59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Wow, a feminist rant from The Montreal Gazette in French Canada. Just goes to show that if you dig far enough,... Conservatives don't care for the dishonest, anti-family nature of feminism, although many Democrats and Republicans do.


18 posted on 08/18/2011 8:52:09 PM PDT by familyop (Behold the genius in contemporary political speech.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Throwback to the 50’s? What identified her - that she’s running for the Republican nomination in the presidential election? So 50’s.

Do editors even look through stories and headlines anymore, or are they entirely reliant on automatic spell-check? Hard to understand how this one slipped through.


19 posted on 08/18/2011 8:55:09 PM PDT by OldNewYork
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Listen, you ignorant women out there who refuse to be victims...we've got a victim industry in America employing thousands of liberal law professors, lawyers and government employees, and if you think you're going to put them out of business with all this uppity success, independence and personal responsibility nonsense, that's selfish, a betrayal of womankind and treason against our great leader at the time when the Obamagruppenfuhrer needs us most.

El Sarcasmo.

20 posted on 08/18/2011 9:47:52 PM PDT by tarotsailor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Aw, hell.

You had me goin’ there until I saw the source.

Good one!


21 posted on 08/18/2011 9:55:01 PM PDT by papertyger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

FU, Canadian leftie bitch.


22 posted on 08/18/2011 10:04:10 PM PDT by ozzymandus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reg45

Wait, the libs have recently been singing the praises of the 50s, when we had 78% marginal tax rates and everyone lived in union-headed households.


23 posted on 08/18/2011 11:38:47 PM PDT by boop ("Let's just say they'll be satisfied with LESS"... Ming the Merciless)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet; All
In 2003, when the Minnesota state legislature had already passed a law making same-sex unions illegal, Bachmann nonetheless proposed an amendment to the state constitution banning gay marriage.

How'd that work out for CA? Voters passed a law banning gay marriage in 2000. Courts shot it down. Voters passed a state constitutional amendment which was shot down, on appeal. On this issue she was just anticipating what was sadly coming down the pike from judicial activists.

24 posted on 08/19/2011 7:56:37 AM PDT by newzjunkey (More soft tyranny from this POTUS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson