Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

PROMISE! My Last Palin Post Ever (Says if Erik Erickson is over you, you're done! LOL)
The Manteca Bulletin ^ | September 30, 2011 | Anthony Cheeks

Posted on 09/30/2011 8:17:51 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-112 next last
To: Sarah Barracuda

I’m with you on your choices.

I was confused because I remember you as a strong Palin supporter, and then there was a Sarah Barracuda posting about how Palin would eventually endorse Perry. I think it’s becoming clear that whatever she does, she won’t be endorsing Perry.


61 posted on 09/30/2011 9:46:49 PM PDT by teg_76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers

Yes, that’s a good analogy. Sums it up nicely.

I don’t want to guess but hoping I
make the top 100 if not the top 1/2 dozen ;-)


62 posted on 09/30/2011 9:47:39 PM PDT by free me (Sarah Palin 2012 - GAME ON!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Mariner
But I think she is not running.

Why would you think that, when she's been doing and saying everything that a presidential candidate does and says, over the last year?

If it walks like a duck, and talks like a duck, it's pretty well certain that it's a duck.

Regarding the question of, "Will she/Won't she?", she has to say that she's "still thinking about it" to keep the curtain pulled on what she's actually doing.

In truth, she really had to make her decision well over a year ago, and she did. Here's the proof: If she'd decided to stay out of the race, she would have told her supporters, so that they could focus their time, attention, and energies on another candidate of their choice.

That said, once she decided to run, she was faced with a second choice - what sort of strategy to employ in seeking the office of president. She's savvy enough to know that someone with her name recognition and massive grass roots support doesn't need to declare early in the process, as many others have to do.

In fact, it's actually detrimental to any candidate to declare early, but most are forced to, because they need to achieve widespread name recognition, build widespread support, attract donors, and spread their message. Someone like Palin already has all that, so doesn't need to open themselves up to attack and meat grinder analysis by the media or their opponents.

Reagan declared later in the process for the same reasons. Why spend monies on running a campaign or expend the energy defending oneself, when you're achieving all the benefits of a campaign on the sidelines for free?

Her campaign strategy is Big League Politics 101.

63 posted on 09/30/2011 9:49:40 PM PDT by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Windflier

Duck 2012. :D

Duck / Cain.


64 posted on 09/30/2011 9:50:47 PM PDT by Cringing Negativism Network ("Cut the Crap and Balance!" -- Governor Sarah Palin , Friday August 12 2011, Iowa State Fair)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Norm Lenhart

Of course. I agree with her statements 100%. If it were up to me alone to anoint the next POTUS............it would be SARAH!

But that’s just it. It’s not up to me. It’s up to millions of Americans out there like you and I. Millions of Americans who need to see something real, a commitment, a willingness to lay it on the line and press ahead.

Romney has a lot of flaws for sure. But, as candidate for POTUS in 2008, he was stabbed in the back by Huck in an end-around for McCain. He took it, quietly (no Twitter or Facebook or “tell alls”) in the meaning years, and rebuilt his organization. He’s done the heavy lifting that NO ONE else has done and he’s back again for 2012. That perseverance is admirable to me. He and his record have been very clear and open for all for many years now.

Vetted? Nobody has been “vetted” like Romney has over the last 4 years. Nobody. Palin is a lay kitten in terms of being vetted. Palinistas, stop whining. Romney’s had the anal exam of all anal exams. I think everyone can agree on that. Skeletons left in his closet? Please, do forward.

Hate it, but as a state’s rightist, a state should be largely left alone to do as it sees so. Abortion, RomneyCare...........for the people of Massachusetts..........okay. For the people of Montana or Texas or Florida? May well be very different. Good and fine. That’s what our Constitution was meant to do.

Ultimate Madisonian-ism.................that is all.


65 posted on 09/30/2011 9:51:08 PM PDT by JoenTX (Don't Tread on Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: teg_76

Yeah that’s the other girl..you can tell the difference right away because even though our user names are very similar, hers is one word(SarahBarracuda) while mine has a space between Sarah and Barracuda :-) I think if she chooses not to run, she will endorse Cain..she is really fond of him and speaks highly of him so I think she would endorse him if she chose not to run, but I still hope she does end up running but that’s her choice. She can take all the time she needs, Im not one of those who say “Hurry up and make up your mind already” its a big decision, and her life has been changed forever since she ran with McCain so I can understand her wanting to take her time with this


66 posted on 09/30/2011 9:51:33 PM PDT by Sarah Barracuda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: JoenTX

Interesting approach to pro-Romney disinformation propaganda.

You start out pretending to be for Palin, then reveal you are actually a Romney plant.

Gosh. That’s certainly subtle.


67 posted on 09/30/2011 9:53:17 PM PDT by Cringing Negativism Network ("Cut the Crap and Balance!" -- Governor Sarah Palin , Friday August 12 2011, Iowa State Fair)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: JoenTX

Vetted? Nobody has been “vetted” like Romney has over the last 4 years. Nobody. Palin is a lay kitten in terms of being vetted.
______________________________________________________________

LOl! That was funny! Yeah, none has been vetted like Palin who still has books and movies coming out about her.

When was the last Romney expose?

LOL!

Seriously thanks for the laugh!


68 posted on 09/30/2011 9:54:09 PM PDT by free me (Sarah Palin 2012 - GAME ON!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Sarah Barracuda

I agree, excellent post.

Especially the part about: “Hurry up and make up your mind already”

Thanks.


69 posted on 09/30/2011 10:00:50 PM PDT by free me (Sarah Palin 2012 - GAME ON!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: JoenTX

“Vetted? Nobody has been “vetted” like Romney has over the last 4 years. Nobody. Palin is a lay kitten in terms of being vetted. Palinistas, stop whining. Romney’s had the anal exam of all anal exams. I think everyone can agree on that. Skeletons left in his closet? Please, do forward.”

It’s safe to say your credibility just went soaring out the window. When Rom gets his Gov emails rifled, please get back to me.


70 posted on 09/30/2011 10:01:12 PM PDT by Norm Lenhart (Chief Druid of Trollhenge: Cult of Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Erick Erickson is not above selling his opinions for influence. We saw that with the “my bosses at Eagle” email, and we’re seeing it again with the way he has gone completely in the tank for Perry after Perry announced at the Redstate convention.

When you look at how many people actually comment on their threads, it’s relatively very few. The posters that are left are “yes-men”. Poster’s who don’t agree with Erick are held to a much higher standard, and usually end up banned.

I don’t know how he managed to get the website viewed as “influential”. It’s not even in the top 20 conservative websites as measured by web traffic.

The stunt today was extremely juvenile. He’s just upset Palin won’t give him the time of day.


71 posted on 09/30/2011 10:03:50 PM PDT by teg_76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network
Duck 2012. :D

LOL!

72 posted on 09/30/2011 10:05:20 PM PDT by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: JoenTX

Please fax me a bag of whatever you’re smoking!


73 posted on 09/30/2011 10:15:36 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (I'll raise $2million for Gov. Sarah Palin. What'll you do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Red State has been doing a Palin watch today....HILARIOUS!


74 posted on 09/30/2011 10:19:27 PM PDT by byteback
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Dunno 2DV, seems like whatever it it zapped his reality circuits pretty good. Then again, throw on some Iron Butterfly and you’d be back in 1968 without the Acid ;)


75 posted on 09/30/2011 10:23:23 PM PDT by Norm Lenhart (Chief Druid of Trollhenge: Cult of Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
It doesn't matter. Palin set the "end of Sept." date before the Ames Straw poll.

There's no good reason to fail to meet one's own deadline. It adds fuel to the "lacks commitment" notion about Palin.

76 posted on 09/30/2011 10:37:17 PM PDT by newzjunkey (Obama wins reelecton; GOP will find a way to lose.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: newzjunkey
Yawn...
77 posted on 09/30/2011 10:41:40 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (I'll raise $2million for Gov. Sarah Palin. What'll you do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: newzjunkey

So go on MSNBC and complain to other liberals as you share and repeat their talking points. FR is a Conservative website supporting conservative candidates, people and philosophy. Note the difference.

PS...Rick Parry PROMISED his VOTERS in Texas he would not run if reelected. Have you railed on him? Just curious.


78 posted on 09/30/2011 10:47:49 PM PDT by Norm Lenhart (Chief Druid of Trollhenge: Cult of Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat

Unfortunately the winners (read: makers) only get one vote, just like the leeches (read:takers). I agree with your analysis however.


79 posted on 09/30/2011 11:00:56 PM PDT by HMS Surprise (Chris Christie can go to hell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: time4good
I pray that God will guide and lead and empower whomever HE wants to turn this country back.

Amen.

80 posted on 09/30/2011 11:05:50 PM PDT by Allegra (Hey! Stop looking at my tagline like that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-112 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson