Posted on 11/08/2011 11:57:50 AM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
On November 2, 2011, I published an article entitled and asking the question, “Is Barack Hussein Obama II Really Bâri′ M. Shabazz, Born October 28, 1959 in New York City? ”, accessed at here. The basis of the question that I asked came from a November 2, 2011 breaking story published by Martha Trowbridge entitled, “Bâri′, Barry, Barack, accessed at here. In her article, Ms. Trowbridge’s contends that putative President Barack Hussein Obama II’s real name is Bâri′ M. Shabazz and that his date of birth is October 28, 1959, and his social security number is 084-54-5926. She says he was born in New York City. She adds that he was born with the name Bâri′ M. Shabazz. She also says that to be able to enter the political world, Bâri′ M. Shabazz had to change his birth identity and take on a new one which became Barack Hussein Obama II.
Ms. Trowbridge says: “We know this: Bâri′ M. Shabazz was assigned social security number 084-54-5926, issued in New York, in 1974.”
Ms. Trowbridge has found that the Social Security Death Index shows: “SHABAZZ, B M 28 Oct 1959 Aug 1994 (V) 34 (PE) (none specified) New York 084-54-5926.” From this, one would think that Bâri′ died in August 1994. But no, Ms. Trowbridge informs that only his identity was made “dead.” The real person continued to live and that person became “Barack Hussein Obama II.” Note how she explains that the “death” of Bâri′ was only reported by someone (“V” or “Verified”) and that the person did not present any valid death certificate (“P” or “Proof).
What’s more Ms. Trowbridge explains that “[o]nce in the federal system, the [death] record was flagged as ‘PE’, meaning that an inconsistency exists between what was reported and what was recorded in the government’s files.”
Finally, and the most shocking part of her report is that Ms. Trowbridge contends that Bâri′ M. Shabazz is the biological son of Malcolm X. Hence, if Barack Hussein Obama II is the same person as Bâri′ M. Shabazz, that would make putative President Obama the biological son of Malcolm X.
On November 4, 2011, an anonymous source emailed me something very interesting. To substantiate the content of the email, the writer directed me to go to a web site of the Judiciary for the State of Hawaii and to do a search of cases that have been disposed of by that State’s traffic courts. The anonymous source had done just that and so the person provided me with the information which that traffic court shows on its web site.
I did go to the Hawaii traffic court’s web site which is called eCourt Kokua and I was eventually able to confirm the information that the anonymous source sent me. Access to the court’s web set may be gained by going to http://jimspss1.courts.state.hi.us:8080/eCourt/ECC/ECCDisclaimer.iface;jsessionid=FDFF513AA90109AC4375A7CBE7C8AF36. Once at the site, click “Agree” to the terms and conditions. Then click, “Search for case details by case ID or citation number.” Once there, enter at the prompt, Case ID or Citation Number(*): 1193041MO and hit Search.” The following report appears: (Click each image to enlarge)
What do these reports say and what questions does they raise? The Case ID is 1193041 MO. The name of the case is State v. Bari Shabazz which was a non-jury case. The case is characterized as a “Traffic Crime,” with a “REPORT number W50100.” The offense occurred on March 12, 1982. The charging police officer is Duane Masayuki Espinueva. The event is characterized as an “Accident Major.” The charge was driving without a valid driver’s license. The case was first filed on Tuesday, March 16, 1982, in the First Circuit, located at Kane’Ohe Division. I checked and this court is located at 45-939 Pookela Street, Kaneohe, HI 96744 . The case was continued to April 5, 1982.
The record also shows that Bari Shabazz was supposed to be arraigned and enter a plea on April 5, 1982, at 8:30 a.m., in Kane’ohe Traffic Court, Courtroom B, at the Kane’ohe Division. The case was continued to May 5, 1982.
On May 5, 1982, at 8:00 a.m., Bari Shabazz was supposed to again be arraigned and enter his plea in the same court room. He apparently did not appear and so the court issued a bench warrant on May 5, 1982, bearing number “BWO 050582.” It appears as though the court set bail at $25.00. The record also shows the entry of “HONDA,” maybe meaning that Bari Shabazz was driving a Honda or that the prosecutor’s name was “HONDA.” The next entry is for May 5, 1982, at 8:30 a.m. The court ordered the “AP” (maybe meaning accused person) to show proof of “NEW YORK DRIVER’S LICENSE.”
The report then shows that the prosecutor on April 9, 2003, filed an ex parte motion to recall the bench warrant and announced on the record “nolle prosequi.” This is a Latin phrase which is formally entered into a court record which means that the prosecutor in a criminal case “will no further prosecute” the case. The motion was listed as “NP [nolle prosequi] 040903.” So, the charge was dismissed upon the prosecutor’s ex parte “Nolle Prosequi” motion made on April 9, 2003. “Ex parte” means that only one side made the application which in this case was the prosecutor.
The final entry was for October 30, 2005, at 8:00 a.m., when the court noted that a $-0- balance was owed, but said “Pls check.”
This information raises the following questions:
1. Is the Bari Shabazz named in this traffic court report the same person Ms. Trowbridge calls “Bâri′ M. Shabazz” in her report and who is listed as “B M Shabazz” in the Social Security Death Index? If it is the same person, then that puts New Yorker Bâri′ M. Shabazz in Honolulu County, Hawaii, on March 12, 1982. Using a date of birth of October 28, 1959, this would have made Bâri′ M. Shabazz 22 years old at the time that he had this major automobile accident in Honolulu County.
2. The accident is characterized as a major accident. Chances are that Bari Shabazz and/or any passenger was taken to a local hospital in Honolulu County due to his/their injuries. If Bari Shabazz suffered any major injuries or laceration, the physical signs of those injuries and/or lacerations could still be present somewhere on his body if he is still alive.
3. Bari Shabazz was charged with driving without a driver’s license. The court ordered him to show proof of his New York driver’s license. Hence, Bari Shabazz must have told the charging police officer or the court that he did have a driver’s license and that it was one issued by the State of New York. Hence, Bari Shabazz must have been a resident of the State of New York. Note that Ms. Trowbridge said that Bâri′ M. Shabazz was born in New York City. Also, what was Bari Shabazz doing driving in Hawaii with what should have been a New York driver’s license? Was he now living in Hawaii? Was he there on vacation? Was he there visiting family or friends? Was he going to school there?
4. On April 9, 2003, the prosecutor filed a motion to recall the bench warrant, to terminate prosecution, and close the case. Why would this case come to the attention of some local prosecutor 21 years following the initial violation of March 12, 1982? A local prosecutor does not just go looking for cases that are 21 years old and file motions to dismiss those cases. Someone must have asked that local prosecutor to dismiss the case so that the arrest warrant was cleared from the court’s and nation’s computer system.
5. Ms. Trowbridge shows that Bâri′ M. Shabazz, according to the Social Security Death Index, died in August 1994. If Bâri′ M. Shabazz is the same person as is listed in this Hawaii auto accident as Bari Shabazz, why would someone care to recall his arrest warrant on April 9, 2003 or almost 9 years after his death? Surely, it could not be Bâri′ M. Shabazz who was interested since he had been dead since 1994. On the other hand, if he was not dead he would be interested.
6. On October 30, 2005, or 23 years following the date of the accident of March 12, 1982, the court again re-visits the case of Bari Shabazz, noting that he did not owe the court any money but to “Pls. check.” Why would the court again concern itself with this case on that date, especially if Bari Shabazz was dead since 1994?
7. So, is the Bari Shabazz named in this Hawaii traffic court report the same person Ms. Trowbridge calls “Bâri′ M. Shabazz” in her report and who is listed as “B M Shabazz” in the Social Security Death Index? That question surely merits an investigation. If he is, then that puts the New-York-born Bâri′ M. Shabazz in Honolulu County, Hawaii, the alleged birth place and once place of residence of putative President, Barack Hussein Obama II. Given what Ms. Trowbridge has concluded in her report, that is a circumstantial piece of evidence that is surely worth investigating. What also supports Ms. Trowbridge’s position that Bâri′ M. Shabazz really did not die in August 1994 and that he is still alive as Barack Hussein Obama II is that the traffic court in Hawaii was still acting on the Bari Shabazz traffic case 9 and 11 years after the alleged death in August 1994 of Bâri′ M. Shabazz. What needs to be investigated is why the local prosecutor and court took those actions so many years after the traffic accident and at whose behest.
8. Finally, when there is an auto accident, the police do a detailed accident report. That report includes the name, addresses, date of birth, and social security number of the person involved in the accident who is charged for that accident. The driver’s license number is also included if that license is produced or otherwise verified. A physical description of the defendant is also included. The make of auto, including the year made and VIN number are also included, along with statements of witnesses. There could be a photograph of the defendant in the police record. A thorough investigation of this matter would surely include searching the police record in Honolulu County for this report so that this information may be examined and evaluated.
Mario Apuzzo, Esq. November 7, 2011 http://puzo1.blogspot.com
The domestic bomb terro5rist, William Ayers, was ‘just a guy in’ Barry bassturd’s Chicago neighborhood ... and they shared board responsibilities and funding committees. The democrat party is a criminal enterprise that is now solidly anti-American and doing the bidding of their father, the father of lies a murderer from the start. Sadly, black voters seem too sold out to the handout regime to awaken from their herd mentality.
Interesting table. He might have been enrolled at Columbia for 82 but die to the accident couldn’t attend, making him a no show, thus a vagueness there from Columbia.
No...remember, how excited, almost giddy, Bari,Barry,Steve,Barack got when he drove the Chevy Volt 12 feet on the assembly line? And I also remember an odd, even for her angry arse self, Me!chelle Obama proudly announcing that “Bah-rock drove her and WeeWon 1.0 or 2.0 home from the hospital.”
Odd...but a talking point ‘see, he does drvie like normal adults.’
Everything about him is weird.
By Jove, I think they’ve got it!
Does make some kind of sense. Like a lot of sense.
Indeed - a DNA sample should not be hard to get nor hard to test.
Interesting.
Thanks for the ping!
For a very long time I’ve suspected that the child born to SADO died in either 1972 or 1973.
The photographs between the young child named Barry and the adolescent named Barack are so very different, and all the later photos appear to be photoshopped, that this has led me to suspect they aren’t the same person. The photos of ten year old Barry Soetoro look as though he is ill, with a puffy face and blotched skin; he looks like a boy I knew who died from a blood cancer.
That there may be a close relationship - according to Fred Nerks, SAD worked as a nanny in Chicogo the summer of 1961 - could provide a reason for the closeness between the Dunhams and Bari Shabazz. We know that SADO didn’t die in 1970, so why would her aunt say that Barry’s mother died unless SADO wasn’t his mother.
Also, and this has really bothered me, there doesn’t seem to be any affection towards Grandpa and Grandma Dunham by their ‘grandson’. That isn’t normal unless he wasn’t their grandson.
Just musing here - I have no facts. But facts seem very scarce when discussing BHO2.
I believe you are recollecting "Westworld II", starring Peter Fonda and Blythe Danner. I don't know why I remember.. cool movie!
I believe you are recollecting "Westworld II", starring Peter Fonda and Blythe Danner. I don't know why I remember.. cool movie!
On further research, I found the Westworld remake was called "Future World."
Thanks for the ping.
I don't think Fred Nerks was saying Stanley worked as an "au paire" in Chi-town in 61, but in the book she is made to say that she did. Everything in the book is put there for reasons.
I WAS ONLY SIXTEEN THEN. SO IF SHE WAS BORN IN NOVEMBER 1942, THAT STATEMENT RELATES TO 1958-59
NOT 1961.(thanks, jeremiah) (
That image which is supposedly of SAD and baby is from the archives of ‘Mohammad Speaks’ - page 18. The event was February 23, 1961, the publication date was in April.
Couldn't be, if the event was a memorial for Malcolm. Malcolm X was murdered on Feb. 21, 1965. SAD would have been 22 then, BHO three and a half, Bari Shabazz 5 years and almost 4 months.
It wasn’t a memorial. MX was a speaker at the event.
Correction: the event was February 1962, publication in April 1962.
So many theories have been injected into the WWW by impostors, poseurs, and an army of armchair detectives, that I'm afraid the waters have been both permanently and purposefully muddied.
One doesn't have to look far in this mud. Thousands and thousands of very odd facts and coincidences can be found all over the net at places like 'The ObamaFile', KOS, and WND. I have one nagging question in all this. How can one human life be such a labyrinth, if it weren't by design? It's like the sewers of Paris, only with a real stench.
And just exactly who are the designers of this mess? Frankly, I have no idea, there are too many bleedin' theories. One thing is clear to me. Any ideology that requires cloak-and-dagger, secrecy, and obfuscation....in my book, is not good for a nation; in fact, it's downright evil, and an insult to honest, hard-working patriots. Unfortunately, the final insult is set to occur in 2013, when his records are sealed for a generation, and Obama escapes to become the petty dictator of some African, 4th-world, communist slum. Good riddance. Then we can all buy new diaries.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.