Skip to comments.Gay Porn Company Shoots New Film on Location at Occupy Oakland
Posted on 11/19/2011 4:52:57 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
This one's bound to catch the attention of the anti-Occupy sect: porn company Dirty Boy Video, which (we're guessing) specializes in videos of boys who are dirty, used a tent at in the middle of Frank Ogawa Plaza as the set for a recent video shoot. As Le Fag reports, along with the promotional stills: "this video could be a nice historical document in years to come, should the movement prove more than a flash in the pan."
Obviously, there's a trailer, which is obviously Not Safe for Work or public Wi-Fi, of the "hipster twink themed" piece of performance art.
I think the OWS (0bama Wuss Staff) have shot their wad.
Just like a tea party. lol
If only something could portray the nature of disgusting gathering better:)
OWS = Open Wide Sphincters
occupy Uranus vol. 1
No doubt there were a bunch of wankers there and now we have a semi-documentary about just that!~
Probing questions could be stimulating.
LFag.com at SFist?
While the news source anticipated the attention of the anti-Occupy crowd, I am more inclined to pity the Occupiers for this blatant Occusploitation. I would like to think this wasn’t their idea. Almost certain this is girlie themed stuff and that Dirty Boys is referring to the minds of the lads involved.
Is this homo stuff after all? How could you then tell the difference between an #Occupation and the normal status quo?
It will no doubt be as iconic of the movement as Nanzi Pelozi's public support.
Air heads and **** heads.
How many children were around when they did this?
I should have read the title more carefully. Duh it does sound like dirty “boys” and I can only hope it’s really not literal boys! Or is this a NAMBLA function.
Like I said, this would be normal for that area. Occupation implies strangers doing something different as a protest. Anybody can film the status quo “gayness” and it’s been done ad nauseum.
I don’t really know. I refrained from actually visiting SFist, which I presume is a San Francisco homo site.
Are we allowed to call them “fags” now? Or is this like the “N-word” where you can only use it if you are one?
PC rules are SO hard to keep up on /sarc
Ahh yes but remember the TEA Party folks are terrorists. So says Joe Plugs....
Real teabaggers gone wild
Dirty White Boys....
The Current FReepathon Pays For The Current Quarters Expenses?
Le Fag? That’s too funny.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.