Posted on 12/02/2011 2:12:58 PM PST by VinL
Springfield, you are right on-—I’ve never been a “blind” supporter of anyone- including Mr. Cain. But, we as constitutional conservatives must stand our ground against the left/dem/msm/Establishment propagandists— We have a way of dismissing Mr. Cain if we don’t think him worthy-— we need not give the enemy the victory of “playing” us one more time.
Or maybe not..
Sarah Palin never endorsed Herman Cain or any of candidates.
Try reading the linked exchange.
Better than what you have. ROTFLOL for what you have.
Worth repeating. Principles of liberty and the survival of the republic are at stake; darkness is covering the land and we lack the moral fortitude to be loyal long enough to discover facts instead of reacting to rumors. Character is all but vanquished, men have been feminized, women have been seduced by a thirst for the unholy power of the ring, leaders like Boehner have had their minds poisoned and there is but a few who would champion the cause of liberty, but even they fight for preeminence instead of liberty. The only one who stands to gain in this conflict of faux outrage is Sauron Sotero. I for one would rather fight for righteousness and fail than to be coward and succeed.
Rickey’s the original Rhinestone Cowboy!
you make some very valid points - this whole thing just makes no sense to me at all.
And why is that?
Is Rush irrelevant too?
And just who are the top five relevant folks right now for you? I'd like to know.
ML/NJ
Iontheball, They want us to talk about the women. Can we not give them that satisfaction??? AND I’m not talking Mr. Cain- I’m talking about Conservatives.
Ok, Mr Media- you want to talk about affairs-— What about Teddy Kennedy, Clinton, Dood, et al, ad infinitum.. You ask questions to the DEMS FIRST, then we’ll answer yours. Credentials to be President? Please ask Mr,. Obama about Columbia, his medical records, his birth certificate — and when you have those answers, THEN, I’ll answer those questions. Until THEN, kiss off!
If Mr Cain survives, and he campaigns thusly (and I think/hope) he will— THEN, we’re cooking with gas.
-:)_
It’s not your fault of course, but some of the food fighting on this thread about Perry (silly me, I thought it was about Cain and Palin) will set FR back 20 years.
I think I lost 25 IQ points just reading some of the kindergarten and irrelevant back and forth.
You're so right.
It's every day I wish I had a geriatric harpy around to correct me.
Not crazy. Evil.
She wanted more from him:
the relationship that she “lied about,” but she never had with him.
“Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned.”
For the same reason the Cainiacs go on the Perry threads.
Queen Sarah has abdicated and returned to her humble igloo, from whence she pontificates in a red Snuggy and moose slippers.
Hannity told her she needs more Christmas decorations on her privete set. LOL!
She believes that she is decorative enough.
Amen to that.
whatever.
caniacs and palinistas are two of a kind and neither know when their chain is being yanked.
Do you have ANY women around you?
Ahhh...good observation. Ginger is a liar and has already been proven to make public comments (via email last time against her former business partner) out of revenge and anger. Gee, think maybe SHE wanted an affair and didn’t get one? Still makes her gilted in her warped mind I”m sure.
Shhhhh...don’t tell them. I’m having fun here.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.