Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Romney lied? Gee who would have guessed.
IX / X / MMXII | pansgold

Posted on 09/10/2012 9:06:27 AM PDT by pansgold

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-150151-171 last
To: Mountain Bike Vomit Carnage

>> You can’t fix stupid.

Amen.

And I have to say, your nick plus tagline is one of the most surreal combinations I have ever seen here on FR. :-)


151 posted on 09/11/2012 8:00:46 AM PDT by Nervous Tick ("You can ignore reality, but you can't ignore the consequences of ignoring reality.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: JustSayNoToNannies

I have been a supporter of the Constitutuion Party for several years. However, who is their Presidential candidate? Is he/she likely to win?

A no show at the polls or a vote for anyone other than Romney means you are unable to negate a positive Obama vote.


152 posted on 09/11/2012 8:27:05 AM PDT by dirtymac (Now is the time for all good men to come to the aid of their country. Really NOW!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: dirtymac
However, who is their Presidential candidate?

No idea.

Is he/she likely to win?

No. But each vote for the Constitution Party is another voice in the chorus telling the GOP, "We're off the GOP-e plantation."

A no show at the polls or a vote for anyone other than Romney means you are unable to negate a positive Obama vote.

True - but it also means I don't have to cast a positive Mittens vote.

153 posted on 09/11/2012 9:11:46 AM PDT by JustSayNoToNannies (A free society's default policy: it's none of government's business.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: Nervous Tick
Mittens is not my candidate - I'm a conservative.

Then I guess you get Obama.

Wrong - I get the Constitution Party.

Yeah, sure you will.

Yes, I do, in the sense that it was claimed I "got" 0bama.

But eventually you’ll have to wake up from your hopium pipe dream

What dream?

and face four more years of reality with either Romney or Obama.

BETWEEN THOSE TWO, which would you prefer?

Is death an option?

The difference between Mittens and 0bama is that Mittens is currently pretending there's a difference - I guess that gives him a hair's-breadth advantage, since he's paying to virtue the proverbial tribute of hypocrisy.

154 posted on 09/11/2012 9:19:18 AM PDT by JustSayNoToNannies (A free society's default policy: it's none of government's business.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: JustSayNoToNannies

>> The difference between Mittens and 0bama is that Mittens is currently pretending there’s a difference

The difference between you and a blind man is that your blindness is willful.


155 posted on 09/11/2012 9:27:20 AM PDT by Nervous Tick ("You can ignore reality, but you can't ignore the consequences of ignoring reality.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: JustSayNoToNannies
"Is death an option?" Sure you can off yourself, but then you will no longer be able to try and persuade all of US to join you, fool.
156 posted on 09/11/2012 9:30:58 AM PDT by MHGinTN (Being deceived can be cured.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: Nervous Tick
The difference between Mittens and 0bama is that Mittens is currently pretending there’s a difference

The difference between you and a blind man is that your blindness is willful.

I'm not blind to what Mittens actually did while in office.

157 posted on 09/11/2012 10:01:54 AM PDT by JustSayNoToNannies (A free society's default policy: it's none of government's business.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: JustSayNoToNannies

And I refuse to be willfully blind to the smoking crater where America used to be, that depicts what OBAMA has done to US while in office.

So you run along now, young man, and play your grabass with Virgil Goode.

Me? I’m going to join the rest of the rational adults and do what I can to perform CPR on the country I love before it flatlines forever.


158 posted on 09/11/2012 10:33:53 AM PDT by Nervous Tick ("You can ignore reality, but you can't ignore the consequences of ignoring reality.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies]

To: Nervous Tick
So you run along now, young man, and play your grabass with Virgil Goode.

Better him than Mittens - at least I won't wake up in the morning and wonder how I wound up in bed with THAT.

159 posted on 09/11/2012 10:40:03 AM PDT by JustSayNoToNannies (A free society's default policy: it's none of government's business.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies]

To: JustSayNoToNannies

>> Better [Goode] than Mittens

The point is, it won’t *be* Goode. Goode doesn’t stand a snowball’s chance in hell of having any beneficial effect whatsoever. But he may help throw Virginia to Obama, which would NOT be goode (in any sense of the word).


160 posted on 09/11/2012 10:51:11 AM PDT by Nervous Tick ("You can ignore reality, but you can't ignore the consequences of ignoring reality.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]

To: Nervous Tick
Goode doesn’t stand a snowball’s chance in hell of having any beneficial effect whatsoever.

I consider it beneficial - nay, vital - the the GOP-e know that they can get conservative votes only with conservative candidates.

161 posted on 09/11/2012 11:01:48 AM PDT by JustSayNoToNannies (A free society's default policy: it's none of government's business.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]

To: JustSayNoToNannies

>> I consider it beneficial - nay, vital - the the GOP-e know that they can get conservative votes only with conservative candidates.

It’s one thing if your boy gets (say) 20%-30% of the vote, and spoils the race in (say) thirteen states. THAT sends a clear message, and yes, it could be long term beneficial (if not exactly wise in the short term).

It’s quite another thing to get 1/2 of 1% of the total vote, while spoiling the race in one important state. You’ll be viewed by the conservative-leaning electorate as insolent toddlers throwing a selfish temper tantrum and pro-actively ignored and blocked from then on. And rightfully so. You’ll actually HURT the conservative cause. And you and your boy will be hated with a blind passion by quite a few real conservatives, should Obama win. Count me one of them.

The latter scenario is far more likely with Goode than is the former scenario.


162 posted on 09/11/2012 12:05:28 PM PDT by Nervous Tick ("You can ignore reality, but you can't ignore the consequences of ignoring reality.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies]

To: Nervous Tick
It’s quite another thing to get 1/2 of 1% of the total vote, while spoiling the race in one important state.

I can't give him any more votes than my 1, and I don't vote in Virginia.

163 posted on 09/11/2012 12:10:58 PM PDT by JustSayNoToNannies (A free society's default policy: it's none of government's business.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]

To: JustSayNoToNannies

So to prove a point to the Republican establishment, you will assist in Obama being re-elected.

I refer back to my original comment.


164 posted on 09/11/2012 12:15:35 PM PDT by dirtymac (Now is the time for all good men to come to the aid of their country. Really NOW!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: dirtymac
So to prove a point to the Republican establishment,

And to not vote for a liberal.

you will assist in Obama being re-elected.

To not fall on a grenade to prevent, is not to "assist."

165 posted on 09/11/2012 12:21:23 PM PDT by JustSayNoToNannies (A free society's default policy: it's none of government's business.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: JustSayNoToNannies; dirtymac

>> To not fall on a grenade to prevent, is not to “assist.”

Yeah, but like it or not, ‘falling on a grenade’ is not what you’re doing.

You’re pulling the pin on a grenade and shoving it down your underpants... and that’s “stupid”.


166 posted on 09/11/2012 12:27:46 PM PDT by Nervous Tick ("You can ignore reality, but you can't ignore the consequences of ignoring reality.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies]

To: Nervous Tick

While he claims to be a conservative, he aids and abets the current POTUS because Romney is not pure enough. Wile I at first attributed idiocy to this idioic group think, and FR is full of these like minded individuals, I know must come to the conclusion that they are indeed trolls; here and spewing there comments solely for the pupose supports their true cause , which can be found on web site such as Democrats Underground.

I believe the we have outed another.

PS. I did not vote for Romney in the primaries. Ron Paul represented my views best except for his foreign policy stance. There were very limited acceptable candidates to choose from. Some were properly conservative but limited on leadership and management skills. Some had good skills but poor credentials. The best of the lot, in my opinion at the time was Newt, even with all of his baggage. But guess what? My candidate did not win. So instead of acting like a spoiled child of 6 who would take his ball and go home, I am interested in the future of this country that is coming apart at the seems under the current communist who hates America, I have decided to support the candidate, who I do not necessarily care for, and try to keep Obama to one term. This other stuff is a distraction and is destructive. We need all of the votes we can get.


167 posted on 09/11/2012 2:37:35 PM PDT by dirtymac (Now is the time for all good men to come to the aid of their country. Really NOW!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies]

To: dirtymac

>> I believe the we have outed another.

IMHO there are four categories of Romney denigrators:

1) Principled (but, IMO, misguided) conservatives
2) “Paultards” (no offense meant to you)
3) Trolls
4) Operatives from the other camp

You can usually categorize ‘em after reading enough posting history. However it can be tough to discriminate between 3) and 4). If posting history is scanty, go with 3) or 4) as a rule of thumb. :-)

I put JSNTN in category 2) based on length of time here and prior posts.

FRegards


168 posted on 09/11/2012 2:48:00 PM PDT by Nervous Tick ("You can ignore reality, but you can't ignore the consequences of ignoring reality.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: pansgold

Crybaby.....sore loser.....traitor.


169 posted on 09/11/2012 5:17:38 PM PDT by Fawn (DEAR JESUS....PLEASE LET OBAMA LOSE.....AMEN.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fawn

Don’t forget Liar!


170 posted on 09/11/2012 11:23:30 PM PDT by Chunga (Ron Paul is a fruitcakey jackass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies]

To: Fawn

LOL!!! LMFAO&ROTF@U


171 posted on 09/12/2012 7:55:13 AM PDT by pansgold
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-150151-171 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson