Skip to comments.Live Thread: "The Project" Part 1
Posted on 09/26/2012 4:37:05 PM PDT by combat_boots
Tonight is the 1st of two nights @ pm, broadcasting a special on the worldwide plan for the Caliphate in general and for the US in particular.
You can read articles on the documents of "The Project" at The Blaze and if you search the Interwebs. They're there.
But this will be visual. I have studied the Islamic world for decades and am known in my family for my dogmatic insistence on what is going to happen--which, unfortunately, Beck now sees, too. I have 'spouted' this for over 25 years, since just prior to 1979.
I can remember sitting on the floor at someone's house, saying, "You don't understand. These people, if they really believe in something, will die for what they want. People didn't much want to talk to me after that.
We also have our own holy war with the libtards.
Here. Will watch.
I have told a few FReepers that I would live blog this.
Anyone that wants to pitch in, feel free.....
Today’s Beck @ 5 pm slot has a lot of research links on it....
The Wahabbi Corridor
which Muslim Staffer is assigned to Your Congressman?
MB must understand that work in AM is a grand jihad....so that it is eliminated.
Best support and aid to global Islamic movement is the establishment of an observant base.
Dec 1, 1982
“placing them under influence.”
Slow. Methodical. Permanent.
Use deception in all areas of gov’t and society to disguise the Islamist agenda.
Infiltrate exsisting Western institutions until they can be subverted to Islam.
Reference to J Edgar Hoover. Communists.
M. Stanton Evans
Is anyone watching on ROKU? Mine says “Your event will begin shortly”
Study of Islamic jurisprudence basically came from mosque literature.
Thanks for the live thread. I’m watching now. Coughlin on now. I read his 300+ page thesis(a couple of years ago) on Islamic jurisprudence throughout history. It is a must read.
“Had I known this when I was over there, I’d still have troops alive.”
I didn’t get the guy’s name on now. Somebody Gorga. Islam 101.
Everything is threatened by a little booklet (Mein Kampf).
Research topic: takaful
Can’t help there, I don’t have the premium account, so it just kicks me out. BUT, if I want to sign up for a free two week account, I can watch and cancel, Beck says he doesn’t care. That’s nice, huh? Watch for free but not if you only have the cheap seats.
Following the thread, so far it mostly looks like an advertisement for books.
Muslim Mafia: Inside the Secret Underworld that’s Conspiring to Islamize America
Give an Islamic policy perspective on current events.
W speaking about ‘radical’ Islam and TROP.
CAIR and ISNA are unindicted co-conspirators in the Holy Land case.
BTW, Hamas means courage.
Now, James Woosley.
“Islam is peace” - Bush 43 useful idiot, dhimmi or just talkin’ taqiyya?
It’s not showing on my Blaze TV iphone app. It says use a pc or mac to view it.
“All we want is to get the truth out.....Gov’t and military are afraid to come forward.”
Under W Admin, PC dominated. “Intelligence preparation of the battlefield.” ISNA and CAIR heavily influenced the echelon’s thinking.
Michelle Bachmann on the difficulty in learning the culture, religious documents and languages.
“What do the terrorists think” “Communists’ disinformation campaign.”
I finally got it going on ROKU. Had to back out of the selection “The Project” and choose “live”
I subscribe to GBTV, but this is the first time I set it up on ROKU.
Just back after Yom Kippur fast. Am going to add this thread to TM, CB. I can’t watch it, unfortunately, but I hope you guys will update as it goes on. Thank you for posting this!
Must do food!
The Venona cables.
Whittaker Chambers & Alger Hiss.
Video of testimony. See link from Beck thread today.
Diana West - (anyone talking against the Muslim Brotherhood)...they try to “shut someone up”.
Just shut up.
Media figures are pressured. Including Erick Stakelbeck. “The Terrorist Next Door.”
Oh, here’s Anderson Cooper and Keith Ellison.
And Ibrahim Hooper.
It gets personal. They get personal.
“Use the enemy’s technology”
The Book Just mentioned by Eric Stakelbeck
The Terrorist Next Door: How the Government is Deceiving You About the Islamist Threat
Steve Emerson is part of The Investigative Project. He was the last American to interview Bin Laden. He also went underground and investigated what was going on in a number of American mosques and organizations. For quite a while, he had to be on the run and off the grid.
Study the centers of power, both local and national.....
The history lesson ignored is that the US gov’t can be infiltrated....to influence operation of the gov’t.
As with communism.
Ghulam Nabi Fai
Get to know this name.
He contributed to....
Rep National Committee
Fai began working for the ISI in the 1980s. President of MSA (Muslim Students Assn).
Andrew McCarthy on now.
The scandal with Nabu Fai went unnoticed and unremarked.
Burton had correspondence with Fai for 20 years?????
The MB “punches above their weight” with terrorism.
Bachmann, “It is important to know who the enemy is.”
Unnamed source in military describes the problem with not knowing the enemy’s name.
Green on blue shootings.
Jihadists have infiltrated military forces in the battlefield, and, as Hasan proved, on installations.
Rather than focusing on terrorism as the sole method of group action, as is the case with Al-Qaeda, in perfect postmodern fashion the use of terror falls into a multiplicity of options available to progressively infiltrate, confront, and eventually establish Islamic domination over the West. The following tactics and techniques are among the many recommendations made in The Project:
In reading The Project, it should be kept in mind that it was drafted in 1982 when current tensions and terrorist activities in the Middle East were still very nascent. In many respects, The Project is extremely prescient for outlining the bulk of Islamist action, whether by moderate Islamist organizations or outright terror groups, over the past two decades.
One renowned international scholar of Islamist movements who also spoke with Besson, Reuven Paz, talked about The Project in its historical context:
The Project was part of the charter of the international organization of the Muslim Brotherhood, which was official established on July 29, 1982. It reflects a vast plan which was revived in the 1960s, with the immigration of Brotherhood intellectuals, principally Syrian and Egyptians, into Europe.
As Paz notes, The Project was drafted by the Muslim Brotherhood as part of its rechartering process in 1982, a time that marks an upswing in its organizational expansion internationally, as well as a turning point in the alternating periods of repression and toleration by the Egyptian government. In 1952, the organization played a critical support role to the Free Officers Movement led by Gamal Abdul Nasser, which overthrew King Faruq, but quickly fell out of favor with the new revolutionary regime because of Nassers refusal to follow the Muslim Brotherhoods call to institute an ideologically committed Islamic state. At various times since the July Revolution in 1952, the Brotherhood has regularly been banned and its leaders killed and imprisoned by Egyptian authorities.
Since it was rechartered in 1982, the Muslim Brotherhood has spread its network across the Middle East, Europe, and even America. At home in Egypt, parliamentary elections in 2005 saw the Muslim Brotherhood winning 20 percent of the available legislative seats, comprising the largest opposition party block. Its Palestinian affiliate, known to the world as HAMAS, recently gained control of the Palestinian Authority after elections secured for them 74 of 132 seats in the Palestinian Legislative Council. Its Syrian branch has historically been the largest organized group opposing the Assad regime, and the organization also has affiliates in Jordan, Sudan, and Iraq. In the US, the Muslim Brotherhood is primarily represented by the Muslim American Society (MAS).
Excerpt from THE PROJECT:
The Muslim Brotherhood "Project" (Continued) By: Patrick Poole
FrontPageMagazine.com | Thursday, May 11, 2006
[NOTE: The following English translation of The Project has been prepared by Scott Burgess and was first published in serial form by The Daily Ablution in December 2005 (Parts I, II, III, IV, V, Conclusion). It is copyrighted and reprinted here with his permission. It is based on the French text of The Project published in Sylvain Besson, La conquête de l'Occident: Le projet secret des Islamistes (Paris: Le Seuil, 2005), pp. 193-205.]
In the name of Allah, the Beneficent and Merciful
1/12/1982 [December 1, 1982]
Towards a worldwide strategy for Islamic policy
(Points of Departure, Elements, Procedures and Missions)
This report presents a global vision of a worldwide strategy for Islamic policy [or "political Islam"]. Local Islamic policies will be drawn up in the different regions in accordance with its guidelines. It acts, first of all, to define the points of departure of that policy, then to set up the components and the most important procedures linked to each point of departure; finally we suggest several missions, by way of example only, may Allah protect us.
The following are the principal points of departure of this policy:
Point of Departure 1: To know the terrain and adopt a scientific methodology for its planning and execution.
Point of Departure 2: To demonstrate proof of the serious nature of the work.
Point of Departure 3: To reconcile international engagement with flexibility at a local level.
Point of Departure 4: To reconcile political engagement and the necessity of avoiding isolation on one hand, with permanent education and institutional action on the other.
Point of Departure 5: To be used to establish an Islamic State; parallel, progressive efforts targeted at controlling the local centers of power through institutional action.
Point of Departure 6: To work with loyalty alongside Islamic groups and institutions in multiple areas to agree on common ground, in order to "cooperate on the points of agreement and set aside the points of disagreement".
Point of Departure 7: To accept the principle of temporary cooperation between Islamic movements and nationalist movements in the broad sphere and on common ground such as the struggle against colonialism, preaching and the Jewish state, without however having to form alliances. This will require, on the other hand, limited contacts between certain leaders, on a case by case basis, as long as these contacts do not violate the [sharia] law. Nevertheless, one must not give them allegiance or take them into confidence, bearing in mind that the Islamic movement must be the origin of the initiatives and orientations taken.
Point of Departure 8: To master the art of the possible on a temporary basis without abusing the basic principles, bearing in mind that Allah's teachings always apply. One must order the suitable and forbid that which is not, always providing a documented opinion. But we should not look for confrontation with our adversaries, at the local or the global scale, which would be disproportionate and could lead to attacks against the dawa or its disciples.
Point of Departure 9: To construct a permanent force of the Islamic dawa and support movements engaged in jihad across the Muslim world, to varying degrees and insofar as possible.
Point of Departure 10: To use diverse and varied surveillance systems, in several places, to gather information and adopt a single effective warning system serving the worldwide Islamic movement. In fact, surveillance, policy decisions and effective communications complement each other.
Point of Departure 11: To adopt the Palestinian cause as part of a worldwide Islamic plan, with the policy plan and by means of jihad, since it acts as the keystone of the renaissance of the Arab world today.
Point of Departure 12: To know how to turn to self-criticism and permanent evaluation of worldwide Islamic policy and its objectives, of its content and its procedures, in order to improve it. This is a duty and a necessity according to the precepts of sharia.
NATO calls the attacks on our military in the field...”rogue incidents”
Nidal Hasan’s treatise and presentation.
Woolsey....”Not being able to discuss the roots of beliefs....makes it extremely difficult to deal with fanaticism.”
Sand Diego office vs DC, with DC winning out on Hasan’s activities as “politically sensitive.”
Gohmert: “To call this workplace violence is...ignorant.”
Green on blue incidents are terror attacks being called “Rogue incidents”.
Hassan’s “workplace violence”
Stephanopoulos and Gen Casey.
“The military protection is not a social experiment”
This Admin says that ‘when radical Islamists kill Americans, it’s nothing more than workplace violence.” Gohmert
reading material for everyone
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.