Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

Oh, but it is, Cynthia. Not the NRA itself, but the American people as a whole, who don't want further restrictions, no matter what your skewed polls say.
1 posted on 04/20/2013 12:51:58 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: 2ndDivisionVet
These people are insufferable.
2 posted on 04/20/2013 12:55:43 PM PDT by Wyrd bi ful ard (Gone Galt, 11/07/12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Hey, Cynthia! ask the people of Boston what they think of gun control...After this week you'll may be surprised.


3 posted on 04/20/2013 12:56:25 PM PDT by darkwing104 (Let's get dangerous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

A “progressive” liberal with common sense? No such animal exists. You’ve got a better chance finding a Bigfoot than you do a liberal with common sense.


4 posted on 04/20/2013 1:09:09 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (The Amnesty Bill - 800 pages filled with 400 waivers and exemptions for illegal aliens.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Cynthia forgot that it was George Wallace who taught all the politicians in America to NOT hold political rallies in large open parking lots ~ sure, they can see you and you can see them and it's all warm and fuzzy, but there are these mad dog killers who don't care ~ they can use the audience to get close and BANG!!!

For what it's worth Gabby seems to have been totally unaware of the existence of George Wallace, and what happened to him ~ and she actually held an open air parking lot event the same year Arthur Bremmer was turned loose!

We need a mandatory course for everyone running for public office. It would be titled "Stayin' Alive On The Campaign" ~ they'd cover types of talk show personalities to not talk to, where to hold meetings, what to do with other people's cellphones and cameras, armed guards, unarmed guards, ...... all the hazards that can take down a campaign or a candidate in a second!

I believe the Sergeant at Arms of the House of Representatives has such a program for new and current Representatives ~ apparently Gabby didn't think it was worthwhile. Now she knows although it might be difficult to tell that! She sure can't explain it.

6 posted on 04/20/2013 1:15:57 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I have known gerbils with better critical thinking skills than Cynthia! A textbook example of someone who is where she because of her race and affirmative action/preferential hiring, not because of her talent.


7 posted on 04/20/2013 1:43:19 PM PDT by La Lydia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Cindy, Cindy, Cindy. Well I see you got your degree in journalism from Auburn. So, I’m sure you learned a lot about the first Amendment to the Constitution and the reason for it. But, I don’t suppose you took a history course and learned about the rest of the Constitution and the Second Amendment and the reason for it.
But I can understand that you, as a true political liberal, only like to refer to those statistics that fit your agenda. You know Cindy, right after the Second Amendment is trashed, the First Amendment is soon to follow. And then the only journalist left are the ones working for the State Regime. But don’t worry, I see where you were named “Journalist of the Year by the National Association of Black Journalist. That should get you a top job in Obama’s National Press Corp. Oh, Cindy, you might wanna check that 90% stat you threw in there. That little mistake could cost you in the competition in this year’s ballot for Journalist of the Year by the National Association of White Journalists. Oh wait, that “White” was a typo.


8 posted on 04/20/2013 1:43:29 PM PDT by ImNotLying (The MSM bears a close resemblance to the world's oldest profession!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Isn’t Cynthia the former editor who was demoted to columnist for being so stupid?


9 posted on 04/20/2013 1:45:30 PM PDT by ozzymandus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

What a waste of column inches. Nothing but leaps of faith, strawmen, with dreck as a binding agent.


11 posted on 04/20/2013 1:52:41 PM PDT by Tghtie Rightie (It appears my hypocrisy knows no bounds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Liberals tears are so sweet. We really hurt their poor feelings.


12 posted on 04/20/2013 1:52:41 PM PDT by GamecockD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Cynthia is the most racist newsperson that I have ever read. Weekly trash in the ajc.


13 posted on 04/20/2013 2:08:02 PM PDT by mirkwood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I don’t bother to refute articles composed entirely of lies and misrepresentations. I don’t have that much time.


15 posted on 04/20/2013 2:31:20 PM PDT by Still Thinking (Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
It would simply have expanded criminal background checks to include guns sold at gun shows and via the Internet, a step supported by 90 percent of Americans, according to polls.



W R O N G.

The very wording is a contradiction.

"Universal background checks" are NOT background checks.

What the neo-communists want with "Universal background checks" is a cross-linked database that includes medical records, prescription drug records, Military service records, credit scores, grade school and college records, school "resource officers" records, civil judgments, employee drug testing, etc, etc.

Essentially, any scrap of data that can be tied to you. At that point the benevolent shepherds in our "most transparent" administration will set the sell / no sell bar as they see fit.

That is not "do you have a felony conviction" check.

Current law already does that.

And the 90% figure?

They are referring to the Quinnipiac University poll from Feb, 2013.

It is a twisting of what was actually asked.

Yeah, I know, SHOCKING, right?

February 7, 2013 - Americans Back Women In Combat 3-1, But Less For Draft, Quinnipiac University National Poll Finds; Support For Universal Gun Background Checks Is 92%

http://www.quinnipiac.edu/institutes-centers/polling- institute/nat ional/release-detail/?ReleaseID=1847

Demographics...

http: //www.quinn ipiac.edu/images/polling/us/us02072013_demos.doc

The questions...

Word format
http://www. quinnipiac. edu/images/polling/us/us02072013.doc

PDF format
http://www. quinnipiac.edu/images/polling/us/us02072013.pdf

What is glaringly obvious by its absence is the exact description of what comprises a universal background check because it never did ask that question.

It also does not differentiate between a private sale and a FFL sale when referring to "gun buyers."

Here is the actual question...

38. Do you support or oppose requiring background checks for all gun buyers?

So of course the question is vague in that it only says "background checks."

NOT universal background checks.

But when it comes out of the neo-communists' mouth it has transformed into...

SUPPORT FOR UNIVERSAL GUN BACKGROUND CHECKS IS 92%

Umm, no, that is NOT the question that was asked.

Quinnipiac University Polling Institute... little bammy, assorted neo-communists, you lie.

.

One more thing...

Quinnipiac University
275 Mount Carmel Avenue
Hamden, Connecticut 06518

.

16 posted on 04/20/2013 2:32:56 PM PDT by TLI ( ITINERIS IMPENDEO VALHALLA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

It’s Cynthia Tucker. What did you expect, logic? That would be like Karl Marx urging you to buy bonds.


17 posted on 04/20/2013 3:19:34 PM PDT by IronJack (=)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

18 posted on 04/20/2013 4:50:24 PM PDT by Lockbar (Quality Factory Loaded Ammunition ------- The New Gold)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Cynthia seems plagued by certain...frustrations.


19 posted on 04/20/2013 5:17:18 PM PDT by Fightin Whitey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Think of the death count if the bombs in Boston had been placed at waist level.

Right now I am thinking of one boy blown apart and his sister with a lost leg, and many others with limbs blown off.


20 posted on 04/20/2013 5:19:10 PM PDT by Ruy Dias de Bivar (Do we now register our pressure cookers?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Fifteen years of highly publicized mass murders carried out by madmen with firearms — Columbine, Virginia Tech, Tucson and Aurora, to name just a few...

And yet all of those combined don't come close to the number of innocents killed (reportedly at least 302) in Mexico and the US that involved guns from Obama's and Eric Holder's operation Fast & Furious.

I'm sure that Cynthia will have a piece coming out righteously condemning Obama and Eric Holder any day now...
/Sarcasm off

22 posted on 04/20/2013 6:20:18 PM PDT by RJL (There's no greed like the greed of a liberal politician buying votes with your money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson