Skip to comments.The New Proof of the KGB’s Hand in JFK’s Assassination
Posted on 11/20/2013 7:46:03 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
It has been 50 years since President John F. Kennedy was assassinated, and most of the world still wrongly believes that the culprit was the CIA, or the FBI, or the mafia, or right-wing American businessmen. It has been also 50 years since the Kremlin started an intense, worldwide disinformation operation, codenamed Dragon, aimed at diverting attention away from the KGBs connection with Lee Harvey Oswald. Not unrelated are the facts that Oswald was an American Marine who defected to Moscow, returned to the United States three years later with a Russian wife, killed President Kennedy, and was arrested before being able to carry out his plan to escape back to Moscow. In a letter dated July 1, 1963, Oswald asked the Soviet embassy in Washington, D.C., to grant his wife an immediate entrance visa to the Soviet Union, and to grant another one to him, separtably (misspelling and emphasis as in the original).
The Kremlins Dragon operation is described in my book Programmed to Kill: Moscows Responsibility for Lee Harvey Oswalds Assassination of President John Fitzgerald Kennedy. In 2010, this book was presented at a conference of the Organization of American Historians together with a review by Prof. Stan Weber (McNeese State University). He described the book as a superb new paradigmatic work on the death of President Kennedy and a must read for everyone interested in the assassination.[i]
Programmed to Kill is a factual analysis of that KGB crime of the century committed during the Khrushchev era. In those days, the former chief KGB adviser in Romania had become the head of the almighty Soviet foreign espionage service and pushed me up to the top levels of the Soviet bloc intelligence clique....
(Excerpt) Read more at pjmedia.com ...
Lets end this thread. It was Lyndon Baines Johnson who set the Dallas assassination up.
I tell you what — it’s the 50th anniversary, so I guess I have to tolerate the tsunami of JFK stories, but in 2014 it will be the 51st anniversary, and I will be really annoyed if the journalists still feel the need to dwell on such a has-been.
I’ve seen CIA, LBJ, Mafia, KGB, Castro, the Cubans from the Bay of Pigs, Corporate interests and many combinations of the above.
I consider Ion Pacepa quite credible
One thing for certain is that KGB had a hand in spreading the silly conspiracy theories, when all available evidence was pointing to the Soviet Union and Cuba. None of those highly publicized theories ever pointed to the obvious!
Look where he’s coming from.
Bush’s fault—End of story.
I think was Jeanne Dixon.
America demands Justice for the Fallen of Benghazi!
JFK is still alive.
I’ll go with mafia for $1000.
This process had its beginning in 1964 through 1968 as the Johnson administrations misguided and grossly mishandled Vietnam War spawned a broad anti-war movement. The ensuing protests unleashed far more than just a demand for an end to the war. Those that blamed America for all manner of alleged sins in the past and determined to transform the United States into a socialist/Marxist nirvana were able to step out from behind the shadows and enter the mainstream of national legitimacy. This swarm of locusts soon enveloped the higher levels of Academia spawning countless clones to further infiltrate and dominate all strata of the education, and media/entertainment establishment as well as assume control of the Democratic Party.
Not only by debasing the curriculum throughout all levels of schooling but through propaganda disseminated by the media/entertainment complex American society was gradually but inexorably altered to reflect the left’s determination to upend the basic moral and religious underpinning of society, thus assuring the populace would look to the government as their savior. This process, underway for nearly two generations, has eventuated in the creation of a massive class of low-information and dependent voters unconcerned about the nation’s future and susceptible to all manner of lies and propaganda from unscrupulous national leaders.
The most doctrinaire, dangerous and devious occupant of the Oval Office in the nation’s history is Barack Obama — the son of an avowed Marxist father, who not only in his childhood, but during all his formative years, was immersed in radical ideology. He would not be president today were it not for the consequences of the events that took place on the 22nd of November 1963.
50 years later and the Mob is still in control.
I think Jackie planned the whole thing as revenge for his cheating.
It was a mistake. Marilyn Monroe (not her real name) was actually aiming at Jackie.
FACT: We’ll never really know the true facts. Just a lot of theories and speculation.
Oswald was a Communist who renounced his American citizenship, relocated to Russia, and returned to assassinate Kennedy. The KGB immediately launched their massive disinformation campaigns to place the blame elsewhere.
It was Mr. Plum in the Kitchen with the Candlestick.
Amazing isn't it.
I think it was male models. They have been responsible for all the assassinations for the last two centuries.
Getting serious, I personally think it was probably just Lee Harvey Oswald but goodness what a remarkable series of events followed the arrest of Oswald.
So the whole Jack Ruby thing doesn’t raise a red flag at all?
Amazing that many of the same people that look to conspiracy theories regarding JFK, take a face value without questioning that John Hinckley acted alone in shooting Reagan, because he wanted to impress Jodie Foster.
Lincoln did it.
All kinds of red flags but in the end I think it was just Oswald.
You are right tho. I could believe almost anything and not be really surprised.
No Lincoln was not old enough. It would have had to have been one of his descendants. Maybe George Lincoln Rockwell?
I’m not sure if Lee Oswald did it by himself, but he was involved somehow. As for the CIA, FBI, LBJ, Mob, KGB, or Marilyn, by the 25th of November there were quite a few folks who were happy with the results, whether they were directly involved or not.
When things happen that are world changing, we as humans feel much more comfortable in believing that there was some powerful group behind that change, whether the change was good or not good. We like to believe in some grand plan.
we humans are not comfortable believing that a single, unknown individual can have that much of an effect on our world. So we invent conspiracy theories because that makes us more comfortable.
There are a couple of things which bother me about Oswald. According to Marine sources he was a mediocre shot. I have been there and it was probably not that hard a shot but even so a nervous shooter using a gun which was sighted in to miss by a foot and a moving target. would have been an almost impossible shot.
Now I was champion of my gun clubs all comers meet and am fairly sure I could have made the shot with a scoped and sighted in Remington 788 in .243. That gun was short inexpensive and known to be very accurate. Even easier would have been a scope mounted AR-15 or even an SKS with a scope properly sighted in.
But Oswald had a junker with a mis-sighted scope. Now although I admit the Carcano was the worst military rifle of WWII, it still would do the job as far as power and accuracy. The only trouble was that scope being off.
You forgot Dr. Who, the Joker, school kids in Dallas, Darth Vader, et al.
Yes, and sometimes there really are conspiracies. Both exist, no?
Lincoln had a time machine and was not dead at the time of JFK’s assassination. He really meant to take out LBJ too. But John Wilkes Booth had a time machine too and shot Lincoln right after he took out JFK. Oswald was there to shoot Oliver Stone but Booth materialized in the line of fire and died on the spot but due to the laws of time travel both Lincoln and Booth dematerialized. So Oswald was blamed. This is why Oswald claimed to be a Patsy, which was a reference to Patsy Cline who died in a tragic plane crash, that was caused by the Big Bopper.
A point of view that traces its self back to 1963 and not before.
Conspiracies became taboo starting in late 1963.
Thanks for posting, one of the best articles on this topic I have seen.
This gun website discusses the Carcano, I’m sure it would be of interest to folks here. Interesting comments too.
I read some of the Warren Commission Report on the gun too, when they tested it, they used some “shims” with it to fix the scope but apparently that’s not all there is to it.
Pearl Harbor?? Anyone?
It’s been 50 years, yes. Will we know what really went down? No. Was Kennedy assassinated? Yes. Did Ruby kill Oswald? Yes. Did the Serial Rape of America begin after that day? Yes. Who began all that? Democrats. Liberals. Progressives. Communists.
History says so.
The media is drumming the assassination of Kennedy. They hope to drown out other things of importance. It is said that continual coverage of a historical event, just might bring it back. I think the media better shut up, unless now that the boy-queer-king is not working out, they do not how else to get him out of there.
Thank you. At least there’ll be one bit of truth on this thread.
Yeah, I guess Gavrilo Princip doesn’t count. He only started WWI
“A point of view that traces its self back to 1963 and not before.”
Or maybe 1865!
“Co-conspirator Lewis Powell (or Paine/Payne) attempted to assassinate Secretary of State William Seward, but only managed to injure him. David Herold accompanied Powell. However, Herold fled before the deed was finished. At the same time, George Atzerodt was supposed to have killed Vice-President Andrew Johnson. Atzerodt did not go through with the assassination.”
And the article goes into it a bit more in depth.
Probably back to Shakespeare I suppose.
Oswald killed Kennedy, and he acted alone.
Oswald killed Kennedy, and he acted alone.
When the Warren Report was issued and documents sealed for 50 years, I wondered why it was sealed. Since the Kennedy Clan was not objecting to the conclusion, I felt that the perpetrators had been punished to the extent that they could be.
Many believed that the assassination was going to lead to war with the Russians. I always figured that Castro and some of his Soviet cohorts were the logical choice for who gave the orders to do it. Retaliation for the actions against Castro by USA/Kennedy.
If the trail led to Castro, and the Soviet Union, the American people would be livid, and demand retaliation which could lead to nuclear war. I figured they sealed it so that wouldn't happen. Figured Kennedy Clan went along with it so nuclear war would not be Kennedy's legacy, and to prevent total destruction of nuclear war.
There are several plausible theories and evidence to back it up, depending on how you interpret it. So all I can say is that there were likely several conspiracies against him, with various motives, and means to do it.
High on the list is Castro/Soviets hiring the mafia and programming Oswald. The recent movie on TV regarding the accidental shooting by a Secret Service Agent was also plausible to me.
As I said right after I watched Jack Ruby shoot Oswald: Now we'll never know for sure, because there won't be a trial and presentation of evidence that will be available to the American people in our lifetime.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.