Dumping a body weighed down by cement anchors is plenty proof of a murder having occured to me.
Speed, I beg to differ. What we are being asked to believe is that
1) Laci and Scott had an argument (about Amber)-
2) Scott left and went fishing by himself.
3) McKenzie the dog left and went for a walk by himself.
4) Laci (8 mos.pregnant) waited a few minutes and then walked 90 miles to the Bay, tied weights/anchors to her wrists and ankles and threw herself in the water.
This is the only loose end I see in this case---a cement anchor. If Peterson did the killing, why on earth would he keep one cement anchor? Why not dump them all while he's at it?
That is extremely close minded and prejudicial of you. It may be proof of littering; of abuse of a corpse; an environmental pollution crime; or even of an attempt to defraud, by a mortuary illegally disposing of a body after taking fees for burial; but, is hardly rises to the level of proof the person was murdered.
Just the mention of "cement anchors" is inflammatory, as it brings to mind the alledged use of "cement overshoes" by supposed "gangsters" to allegedly dispose of bodies.
It may also have been the result of a bizarre suicide with the intent of framing someone for murder.
Why, it could even have been an attempt gone awry of a deranged person attempting to prove their faith via the miracle of walking on water, while wearing cement overshoes.
We must keep an open mind to the point all reason falls out, according to Mr. Schulman