Okay, this is both a personal smear and completely irrelevant to proving your case.
You have all the qualifications to have been on the prosecution team in the trial of Scott Peterson.
Personal smear? HA! Your writing speaks for itself.
I do not have a case to prove.
Your premise is bogus.
You have not made a legitimate arguement.
Your musings are simplistic.
They fail in the face of the massive circumstancial evidence.
You're trying to peddle your 'book.'
"You're trying to peddle your 'book.'"
That particular book came out seven years ago. Six more of my books have been published since, and none of them have anything to do with this topic. Neither does my next book.
I've already had one poster to this forum threaten to write bad reviews of all my books on Amazon.com for spite.
Yeah, that must be it. I came here to sell my old book.