New Churchill Fraud Uncovered (Evidence suggests he appropriated another veteran's war experience)

Pirate Ballerina ^ | March 11th, 2005 | jwpaine

[Congressman Billybob]

I preserved the link to PirateBallerina, and mentioned them in my lead sentence to the News. I like my copyright respected. I'm certain the same applies to PB. John / Billybob

[crazyhorse691]

OK.

[traderrob6]

The more we dig the more we find more here

[TomGuy]

Yet CU is trying to negotiate his "retirement" with a payoff of $3-5 Million.

That is a shakedown that would make Jesse J envious.

[infidel29]

I don't see what Churchill and Co. are trying to prove, this case isn't First Amendment, it's academic fraud, copyright infringement (the artwork), misrepresentation(his lack of a degree).

The First Amendment guarantees his right to spew whatever B.S. he wants to, it doesn't insure that CU has to give him a pulpit from which to spew it. His "lawyers" are clutching at straws by going after First Amendment.

Anyone who's had his class should sue him and CU for selling a defective product. Communism. It's defective. Communism hasn't stood up to the test of time as a successful socio-economic policy.

[Swanks]

Ward Churchill, the gift that just keeps giving...

Exactly. Ward Churchill, Harry Reid and Howard Dean in their respective roles forever.

[GoldCountryRedneck]

"I tend to agree that paying him off is absolutely wrong, but by getting rid of they deprive him of what he craves the most.."

At every industry job I've ever held, a mis-representation, or outright lie, discovered after my hire date would have been cause for *immediate* termination.

Period. No buy out. No fringe benefits. Nada.

I can't understand why gov't or academic types seem to get a pass courtesy of the double standard.

I agree with your later point that a PUBLIC accounting of his fraud would be a good step. But, I think that that, too, will be swept under the rug.

And I hate to see him walk away with all the tax-paid bucks to boot.