Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: MacDorcha
Good grief right back. Ever heard of an example? Or do you posit that that it not something claimed by evolution's teachings?

Yes (the later). A rat evolving into a cat, or vice versa, is incompatible with what is universally claimed and accepted by evolutionists. Rats and Cats both represent Orders of mammals (Rodentia -- rodents, about half of all mammal species; and Carnivora -- dogs, cats, bears & weasels, seals, etc). They are equal level taxa which (I believe) make their first appearance at roughly the same time. It has never been proposed, nor is it plausible, that one evolved from the other. They both share some earlier last common ancestor which would not be classifiable as either a "rat" or a "cat".

129 posted on 07/06/2005 10:28:54 AM PDT by Stultis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies ]


To: RadioAstronomer
Also meant to ping you to the preceding.
130 posted on 07/06/2005 10:29:42 AM PDT by Stultis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies ]

To: Stultis

Please see post 135.

Though thank you, for your civility.

I don't believe we've met before. Odd given the amount of time we've both been on.


139 posted on 07/06/2005 10:48:19 AM PDT by MacDorcha (In Theory there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice there is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson