Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Texas Concealed Handgun Law: Ten Years Later
Dallas Blog ^ | 1/5/2006 | Hon. Jerry Patterson

Posted on 01/05/2006 12:39:22 PM PST by Pop Fly

VIEWPOINT: THE CONCEALED HANDGUN LAW: TEN YEARS LATER By Hon. Jerry Patterson

When the Texas Concealed Handgun Law took effect in 1996, pundits and naysayers predicted anarchy. Any minute, there would surely be mass violence as armed Texas citizens began roving the streets settling arguments with gunfire. Certainly, several proclaimed, within a year there would be blood in the streets as Texas returned to the days of the Wild West.

Ten years later the facts paint a different picture. Texas under the Concealed Handgun Law isn’t the Wild West, but the Mild West. No recurrent shootouts at four-way stops, no blood in the streets. Quite the contrary, Texans are safer than before.

But why are we safer? Why did the fears of the naysayers fail to materialize?

One of the reasons I authored Senate Bill 60, the Concealed Handgun Law, was because I trust my fellow Texans. Contrary to opinions expressed on almost every editorial page across the state, I knew that when law-abiding Texans’ constitutional right to keep and bear arms was restored with the passage of S.B. 60, they would exercise good judgment and behave responsibly.

Ten years later, and the statistics continue to prove the point.

Since the passage of the Concealed Handgun Law, the FBI Uniform Crime Report shows an 18% drop in handgun murders, down from 838 in 1995 to 688 in 2004. And a 13% drop in handgun murders per 100,000 population, down from 4.5 murders per 100,000 Texans in 1995 to 3.95 per 100,000 in 2004.

In 2000, on the fifth anniversary of the Concealed Handgun Law, the National Center for Policy Analysis issued a report that indicated Texans with concealed carry permits are far less likely to commit a serious crime than the average citizen.

According to the report, the more than 200,000 Texans licensed to carry a concealed firearm are much more law-abiding than the average person.

The report illustrated that Texans who exercise their right to carry firearms are 5.7 times less likely to be arrested for a violent offense. They are 14 times less likely to be arrested for a non-violent offense. And they are 1.4 times less likely to be arrested for murder.

H. Sterling Burnett, a senior policy analyst at the NCPA and the author of the report, concluded:

“Many predicted that minor incidents would escalate into bloody shootouts if Texas passed a concealed-carry law. That prediction was dead wrong,” Burnett said.

With 247,345 concealed handgun licenses active in Texas as of December 2005, the number of law-abiding licensees has had a positive effect on the crime rate.

Texas Department of Public Safety Uniform Crime Report indicates the overall crime rate in Texas has continued to drop over the past 10 years. In 1997, DPS reported 5,478 crimes per 100,000 Texans, based on a population of 19,355,427 Texans. In 2004, with almost 3 million more Texans, the crime rate is 5,032 per 100,000.

The effect of the Concealed Handgun Law has been so positive, it has converted some of its most outspoken initial critics.

John Holmes, former Harris County district attorney, wrote to me several years after the passage of the law.

“As you know, I was very outspoken in my opposition to the passage of the Concealed Handgun Act. I did not feel that such legislation was in the public interest and presented a clear and present danger to law abiding citizens by placing more handguns on our streets,” Holmes wrote. “Boy was I wrong. Our experience in Harris County , and indeed state-wide, has proven my initial fears absolutely groundless.”

Glenn White, president of the Dallas Police Association, shared this view. “I lobbied against the law in 1993 and 1995 because I thought it would lead to wholesale armed conflict. That hasn't happened,” White told the Dallas Morning News. “All the horror stories I thought would come to pass didn't happen. No bogeyman. I think it's worked out well, and that says good things about the citizens who have permits. I'm a convert.”

To the supporters of individual liberty and the constitutional right to keep and bear arms, this outcome is no surprise. However, the Concealed Handgun Law isn’t just about personal safety. Perhaps even deeper than its roots in constitutional freedom, the Concealed Handgun Law is about trust.

And after ten years, the Concealed Handgun Law is a shining example of what happens when elected officials have faith in their fellow Texans.

The legacy of Senate Bill 60 is grounded in the concept that our government should place its trust in us, not the other way around.


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: banglist; california; concealedweapons; crime; guncontrol; handguns; politics; righttocarry; sanfrancisco; texas
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-67 last
To: Pop Fly; Eaker; humblegunner; TEXASPROUD

OUESTION ?

New Travelers law took effect Sept 1 that says any Texan can carry a concealed handgun in their vehicle while out and about regardless of crossing of county line or staying overnight as old traveling defined etc etc....

Now does the fact that there is a travelers law drop the requirement for me to show my CHL to the LEO on the traffic stops ?

Or did that Sept 1 rule state that the "traveler" has to tell the LEO they have a firearm in the vehicle ?

Anyone know if that was brought up ?


51 posted on 01/05/2006 4:59:44 PM PST by Squantos (Be polite. Be professional. But, have a plan to kill everyone you meet. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Squantos

Good question.

Having had a CHL for so long I didn't even think about it.

If stopped I will present my CHL with my TDL as I understand that nothing has changed in this regard.

Plus the offense will probably minor as in 120 in a 70 or some such thing that will only land me a warning.

Seriously, I read the law a few weeks ago and didn't see this mentioned. This law will probably modified to force them to do so.

Once again, very good question!


52 posted on 01/05/2006 5:27:22 PM PST by Eaker (My Wife Rocks! - I will never take Dix or El Roy off of my ping list.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: proud American in Canada
I had the pleasure of living in Texas for about six months. I love people in the South--so friendly and polite

I know what you mean.
The Texans are a very welcoming people.



In any case, this article is certainly timely, given the City of Ottawa's voluntary "illegal gun" handover, set to begin next week, I believe.
I was just shaking my head. Tell me what criminal is going to "hand over their guns, no questions asked."
Ottawa is saying, "if it saves even one life, isn't it worth it?"


This idea is completely asinine, and will solve nothing!

It's no more than posturing for provincial funding, and the beginning of Bob Charelli's mayoral campaign. Just another Liberal.

Vince Bevan, our Chief of Police? A joke.

It's not "no questions asked".

The citizen is supposed to call the police department.
They will send a cruiser to your home to pick up your unregistered gun.
They will test the gun.
53 posted on 01/05/2006 5:29:54 PM PST by fanfan (" The liberal party is not corrupt " Prime Minister Paul Martin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Eaker; Shooter 2.5

http://www.tsra.com/HB823_Keel.htm

I'm full of questions as ya well know........;o)

It's the answers I must seek !

Maybe a call to this State Rep Keel will do at the link above ?!?!?!?

Thanks Eaker !


54 posted on 01/05/2006 5:33:35 PM PST by Squantos (Be polite. Be professional. But, have a plan to kill everyone you meet. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Squantos

Let me know as this affects the few people I know that aren't licensed.

See ya!!


55 posted on 01/05/2006 5:40:28 PM PST by Eaker (My Wife Rocks! - I will never take Dix or El Roy off of my ping list.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Eaker

WILCO !


56 posted on 01/05/2006 5:44:24 PM PST by Squantos (Be polite. Be professional. But, have a plan to kill everyone you meet. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Beagle8U
I believe that John Lott has done the studies, and has been vilified in the MSM for it.
57 posted on 01/05/2006 6:36:52 PM PST by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: proud American in Canada

I had the privilege of riding my Harley from California to Virginia twice, once in 1982 and again in 1984. I Both times I had a 30 day leave. As I have a strong interest in history, I had to stop at historical points of interest – Tombstone, Arizona among them. Hollywood tells us people were shot in the street every day. Not so. I checked out Abilene, Kansas – another rough, tough shoot ‘em up town according to Hollywood. Nope. Loud drunks after a cattle drive, but shootings were rare. Local libraries keep old newspapers on microfilm, and it was actually a lot of work to find news of “wild west shoot outs”. In no old West town could I find Hollywood.
I also checked out old Army posts. I had visions of the Hollywood version – a wood stockade on the plains, under constant Indian attack. Nope. Logs come from trees – and there were few trees on the Plains. There were also few Indian attacks. The accounts I read showed utter boredom to be the real enemy.


58 posted on 01/06/2006 2:57:02 AM PST by R. Scott (Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: proud American in Canada

There was one other place of interest I want to mention but couldn’t remember the name when I posted – Dodge City. A true Hollywood gunslinging town.
Nope. Really kinda peaceful.


59 posted on 01/06/2006 3:39:03 AM PST by R. Scott (Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: hophead; Ancesthntr
"That is THE major problem with CCW laws. Any time you need to get a "permit" to do something that is a "right" guaranteed by the Constitution, the powers to be who issued the "permit" can withdraw the same. So much for the "Right to keep and Bear Arms"."

I agree, but we gotta start somewhere. 'Must Issue' is much better than 'May Issue' like NJ where only the rich, famous, or politically connected get permits.

60 posted on 01/06/2006 1:22:40 PM PST by jjm2111 (Can't wait for the next Holiday!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: jjm2111
I agree, but we gotta start somewhere. 'Must Issue' is much better than 'May Issue' like NJ where only the rich, famous, or politically connected get permits.

We'll take it back only a slice at a time, the same way as it was taken from us. The dream of a Supreme Court case overturning the '34 NFA, the '68 GCA and the '86 machine gun ban is just that, a dream.

61 posted on 01/06/2006 1:42:04 PM PST by Ancesthntr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Pop Fly
Great report. Keep it handy to send to other states that are trying to ban guns because "they kill innocent people." Too bad the citizens of San Francisco didn't read this report before they voted to ban guns.
62 posted on 01/06/2006 1:55:00 PM PST by NRA2BFree (http://www.angelfire.com/nm2/chainreaction/Kitties/LittleFReepers.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Squantos

I don't know the answer to that but it reminded me that the TSRA annual meeting is a couple of miles from me. I hope I didn't miss it.


63 posted on 01/06/2006 3:04:56 PM PST by Shooter 2.5 (Vote a Straight Republican Ballot. Rid the country of dems. NRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Shooter 2.5; TEXASPROUD

Good deal Shooter....... if ya go ask the question for this TSRA Life Member if ya will please ......:o)

Hope yer well !!

Seems unfair to hold one CHL holder accountable in their vehicle and someone under the travlers law gets a free pass on that requirement. Specifically since I "think" the CHL shows up in the DPS data base available to the trooper anyway when he comes up to my vehicle on a traffic stop......

Seems to be nothing more than an "audit trap" anyway (IMHO).....

Stay safe !


64 posted on 01/06/2006 4:17:55 PM PST by Squantos (Be polite. Be professional. But, have a plan to kill everyone you meet. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: R. Scott

True. Certain parts, especially some saloons could be quit exciting, but in general the streets were very safe. It was true that almost everyone was armed, even the ladies. As a result, common street crime was rare. There just weren't any muggings. Stagecoach & trains were a different matter, but even those were risky for the crooks.


65 posted on 01/10/2006 1:45:25 PM PST by PokerMaster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: PokerMaster
There just weren't any muggings. Stagecoach & trains were a different matter, but even those were risky for the crooks.

And from what I could find, even that was rare when compared to convenience stores today.
66 posted on 01/10/2006 2:57:50 PM PST by R. Scott (Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Pop Fly

bookmark


67 posted on 02/27/2007 9:05:21 AM PST by traviskicks (http://www.neoperspectives.com/Ron_Paul_2008.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-67 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson