Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Lokibob
It is a lot easier to give you the link with the organized info there.

Isn't this the Bloggers and Personal forum?

Don't go if this upsets you? I don't generate money from my website with hits, as you can tell with no banner adds or popups. It is strictly a source of information.

3 posted on 01/17/2006 10:04:07 AM PST by carolinacrazy (Bow to your sensei.... BOW TO YOUR SENSEI...... www.jackassdemocrats.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: carolinacrazy

Can't get to your link at work.

But on this topic, terms need to be defined.
1) wiretapping. Is that limited to wires? Or does it cover eavesdropping on radio signals from cellphones, satelites, microwave, etc. The Supremes have consistently held that nobody using radio signals can reasonably expect privacy because that privacy is technically impossible, which is why signals are scrambled, encrypted, etc.

2) Unreasonable Search and Seizure. The 4th only prohibits unreasonable search and seizure. The 4th does not prohibit reasonable search and seizure.

Is it reasonable to search phone calls (wire or other) from Al Kaeda? From a 3 time child molestor on parole?
I think congress should define what is reasonable and unreasonable with a 10 year sunset on that definition? Who thinks the president or Courts should define the terms?

Is there a "rule of law" objective definition of reasonable or is it totally subjective... it is reasonable to search people I can get away with searching but not those I can't get away with searching because they have too much clout or access to clout?


4 posted on 01/17/2006 10:23:53 AM PST by spintreebob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson