Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Create American Port Authority
2/26/06 | Pending

Posted on 02/26/2006 8:26:10 AM PST by pending

Correct Solution of the Current Port Problem

Create National/Private (Both?)

American Port Authority

Details to be hashed:

Mandatory Category:

1) American citizenship

2) English Speaking

Existing Workforce, with X amount of time in is Grandfathered(limits),langauage, security and Citizenship.

Existing non Citizens have X amount of time to become English Speaking American.

Strict by the numbers security/clerance,top to bottom.

NO SNAFUs, No Business as Usual. ***** Maybe:

Run as for profit Fed Agency?


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: dubai; hillaryclinton; portauthority

1 posted on 02/26/2006 8:26:11 AM PST by pending
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: pending

Turn it over to the TSA, they got tons of folks that aren't doing anything.


2 posted on 02/26/2006 8:27:13 AM PST by Tijeras_Slim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pending

wonder why no firm has stepped up to the plate....must be no money in it.


3 posted on 02/26/2006 8:27:50 AM PST by the invisib1e hand ("Who is it, really, making up your mind?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pending

Isn't this Hillary's plan?


4 posted on 02/26/2006 8:28:44 AM PST by Siena Dreaming
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tijeras_Slim
Yeah, if we could only have more non-English speaking TSA employees keeping us safe! LOL!!!
5 posted on 02/26/2006 8:28:54 AM PST by 69ConvertibleFirebird (Never argue with an idiot. They drag you down to their level, then beat you with experience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: pending

There's not enough stuff being run by the federal government right now, so why not add this?


6 posted on 02/26/2006 8:29:58 AM PST by mhx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pending

That's what the Democrats will want. Federally run and operated ports. With all the union-laden trimmings.

Any American company, large enough to do this, would be a sitting target for the Dems and their union handlers.

Maybe that's why they sold out to begin with.


7 posted on 02/26/2006 8:30:02 AM PST by digger48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pending

Utterly amazing how "Conservatives" who whine constantly about Govt Spending are continually looking for NEW parts of the Private Sector to turn over to the Feds. Here is the deal, listen for once and get OVER your panic attacks. The slip operators do NOT "run our ports" or "manage security in our ports". Ports are run by Local Govt Port Authroties. Secuity is provided by local and federal agencies. There is NOTHING wrong with the existing system. Actually shut up for a couple of days and LISTEN to the facts. This is NOTHING more then a Democrat Senate Election year PR stunt. There is NOTHING broke here that needs a Govt "Fix".


8 posted on 02/26/2006 8:34:27 AM PST by MNJohnnie ("Good men don't wait for the polls. They stand on principle and fight."-Soul Seeker)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pending

If you love the Post Office and DMV, you'll love the government running the ports.


9 posted on 02/26/2006 8:35:10 AM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pending

After the Feds take ownership of the ports, who do you think they will contract the operations out to?


10 posted on 02/26/2006 8:35:39 AM PST by TimSkalaBim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pending

Nationalize the ports. Riiight.

Good idea. /sarcasm/


11 posted on 02/26/2006 8:36:04 AM PST by saganite (The poster formerly known as Arkie 2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pending

Federal Government expansion, not just for liberals any more!


12 posted on 02/26/2006 8:36:59 AM PST by Luis Gonzalez (Some people see the world as they would want it to be, effective people see the world as it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pending
Yes, Americans should be in control or our security.

I keep seeing these a** politicians playing this game of globalism, like it is God's 11th commandment!... I say HELL NO!... ANYTHING even closely related to security should be under U.S. Control. How? I don't the technicalities, but I don't want the English or any other nationality to be involved in our security. The ports security - pure common sense! - can not be JUST the responsibility of the coastguard. WE ALL KNOW, they don't have man power, etc to take on such huge undertaking. The company, or US Goverment, that handles the ports should have our intelligence agencies closely scrutinizing the whole thing.

Again, I do like the president, but frankly is inaction in securing the border, leaves with NO CREDIBILITY in my own eyes, I regret to say. I am ranting? ... I hope not :)

13 posted on 02/26/2006 8:38:37 AM PST by ElPatriota (Let's not forget that we are still friends despite our differences!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Luis Gonzalez

LOL! Dems for govt control for jobs. Pubs for govt control for security. A marriage made in heaven.

Now, where's the party I'm going to vote for?


14 posted on 02/26/2006 8:38:44 AM PST by saganite (The poster formerly known as Arkie 2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Siena Dreaming

Another Mandatory: Union Stays Intact.

Hillary's Plan?
No. It is My Plan.
Heh.
Forever Famous Freep.
Heh.


Stick to the idea pleae, let's not worry about Party BS,
Just doing this thing Right.

The idea is sound,The Answer is Correct.

Anyway
If it happens, Hillary can say she thought of it all she wants, nobody will care.
Only that it got done, Correctly.

The powerful Bi-Partisan coalition would signal finally, the end of the Clinton legacy of divisive mean spirited, Party Line,Non Sense.


15 posted on 02/26/2006 8:39:31 AM PST by pending
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ElPatriota

Umm. I hate to break it to you but security at the ports is under our control. Next.


16 posted on 02/26/2006 8:39:50 AM PST by saganite (The poster formerly known as Arkie 2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: pending

---Maybe: Run as for profit Fed Agency? ---

:^)


17 posted on 02/26/2006 8:40:13 AM PST by claudiustg (Delenda est Iran!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pending
Hillary can say she thought of it all she wants

She already has been thinking and talking about Federalizing ports the last 3 years.

You're a little late but she will be glad you joined her.

18 posted on 02/26/2006 8:43:15 AM PST by Siena Dreaming
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: pending
As someone who works for a "for profit" gov't agency, I can safely say, there are a few problems with this:

1. Under no circumstances can the term "no SNAFUs" and Federal agency ever be used in the same general area.

2. There will be the federal union, but the existing unions MUST (legally) be dissolved unless the fed. gov't contracts the whole thing out, which would negate the "for profit" part.

btw - I have been saying for a week that this whole debacle was a ploy to create another federal bureaucracy. Glad you're on board.
19 posted on 02/26/2006 8:46:51 AM PST by Hoodlum91 (pcottraux says I'm special!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie

There seems to be no American Company, so we Make one, using Americans, Our rules, our language, Our Laws, Period.
No SNAFUs.



I lean towards Heavily regulated Private.

Hillary wiil want State,
we hash out how to integrate ,
minimum Tax money, For Profit oriented Private Management.

Worth consideration Paramilitarize the Union,as a private Army, Guns and training, equipment.
Lets get serious People, now is the opportunity.
Now.
Who is gonna screw with an American dockworker anyway?
How about when they are organized armed and trained?
Hello?


20 posted on 02/26/2006 8:49:17 AM PST by pending
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie
correct. This deal will go through with the RATs and GOP signing off on it while bashing it at the same time.
21 posted on 02/26/2006 8:50:49 AM PST by satchmodog9 (Most people stand on the tracks and never even hear the train coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: pending

LOL! Break out the tinfoil buddy. Armed dockworkers!! That's a howler.


22 posted on 02/26/2006 8:55:24 AM PST by saganite (The poster formerly known as Arkie 2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: pending
Worth consideration Paramilitarize the Union,as a private Army, Guns and training, equipment. Lets get serious People, now is the opportunity.

We need union dockworkers to become a private army?

Dude, they drive forklifts, not Humvees.

23 posted on 02/26/2006 8:55:50 AM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: pending

You are an effin idiot, IMO.


24 posted on 02/26/2006 8:56:16 AM PST by Pox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: saganite
Hi, point well taken

What about the second part of my post... the border-security issue. How do you qualify the president's leadership on this issue?

The thing is, I maybe a retard.. because I don't see too many people, even here in FR, touching the subject!...from the moment I heard about the "ports security issue" I immediately thought of the "border" and our war in Iraq. All 3 things related under the name of SECURITY. Now, if SECURITY is so important that we have to send people to die defending it in Iraq, doesn't stand to reason the the securing the border should have taken place years ago as well? I would have thought that the border would have been shut close a long time ago, give the fact our dear president cares so much about our security.

Would you explain the inconsistency to me, You or ANYONE?...

25 posted on 02/26/2006 8:59:54 AM PST by ElPatriota (Let's not forget that we are still friends despite our differences!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: ElPatriota

Border security is one of the hottest topics on FR. Did you do a search on it before you posted your opinion? As for the Prez's leadership on border security, it's non existent.


26 posted on 02/26/2006 9:03:47 AM PST by saganite (The poster formerly known as Arkie 2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: saganite
ok, that is my feeling to. But my question is...HOW do you explaing the inconsistency?

And it is true that all this uproar about the ports-issue is just the product of hysteria and ignorance of many of us, why would the president feel we should take him at "his word?"... I say that all this noise about the ports has to do with his lack of credibility on the very issue of SECURTY... Many of us simply do not trust him!.. not because he is an evil person, as the Dems will try to paint him, but because his actions - his jugdment -especially on the border, where the defficiencies are so clear to everyone, show exactly the opposite. I want to understand WHY he has not done anything on securing the border. Because as long as I don't have a satisfactory answer on this, I will got give him the benefit of the doubt on other issues, especially on security.

27 posted on 02/26/2006 9:13:35 AM PST by ElPatriota (Let's not forget that we are still friends despite our differences!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: pending

One would Hire Guys From DP/Industry, to manage it.

for profit, Managed as a modern corporation,
Extra levels of security, and responsibilities.

We cannot overlook what is in these boxes forever folks.

Our Own American Dockworker Army.

Damn straight you got some
Gung Ho
Positive damn attitude,
We is Americans Boy,
Just Fuggitabodit
in that group.
I'll Gar on tee.

You Mean, we git to go thar an a practice
Gun shootin?

Heh.


28 posted on 02/26/2006 9:22:17 AM PST by pending
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie
"There is NOTHING wrong with the existing system. Actually shut up for a couple of days and LISTEN to the facts. This is NOTHING more then a Democrat Senate Election year PR stunt. There is NOTHING broke here that needs a Govt "Fix"."

100% correct. I think we have some RATS in disguise or we just have some real dunces here. There have been some very good posting with much information that should open some minds. Guess they just don't read.
29 posted on 02/26/2006 5:28:18 PM PST by Logical me (Oh, well!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson