Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

TIME Magazine understands why Democrats lose
Stingray: a blog for salty Christians ^ | April 9, 2006 | Michael McCullough

Posted on 04/09/2006 8:48:16 PM PDT by DallasMike

Someone at TIME Magazine has finally figured out why Democrats lose elections. Joe Klein blames the losing record of the Democrats on their dependence on consultants and focus groups. Limbaugh has been saying this for years -- I don't know why it's taken so long for a smart man like Klein to figure this one out. When it comes to politics, the Democrats are still at "Ned in the First Reader."

Democrat DonkeyOf course, the other reason that Democrats lose elections is that they're wrong on the issues, but Klein hasn't figured that one out yet and probably won't.

Klein talks of Gore losing the 2000 election:

Gore won Michigan and Pennsylvania, but he lost an election he should have won, and he lost it on intangibles. He lost it because he seemed stiff, phony and uncomfortable in public. The stiffness was, in effect, a campaign strategy: just about every last word he uttered—even the things he said in the debates with George W. Bush—had been market-tested in advance. I asked Devine if he'd ever considered the possibility that Gore might have been a warmer, more credible and inspiring candidate if he'd talked about the things he really wanted to talk about, like the environment. "That's an interesting thought," Devine said.

Klein says of the Kerry campaign:

"We're going to meet the voters where they are," Shrum had told me early in the Kerry campaign, which sounded innocent enough—but what he really meant was, We're going to follow our polling numbers and focus groups. We're going to emphasize the things that voters think are important. In fact, Shrum had it completely wrong. Presidential campaigns are not about "meeting the voters where they are." They are about leadership and character. Mark Mellman, Kerry's lead pollster, figured that out too late. "If you asked people what they were most interested in, they would say jobs, education and health care," he later said. "But they thought the President should be interested in national security."

Klein finally says this about political consultants:

Consultants are unavoidable, given the complexity of modern communications. But I have a vague hope that the most talented politicians now realize that the public has come to understand what market-tested language sounds like, and that there is a demand for leadership, as opposed to the regurgitation of carefully massaged nostrums.

What Klein does not yet understand is that Americans want a leader. I'm not fond of everything that President Bush has done but I know that he's a statesman in the class of Churchill and not a prissy political hack like John Kerry. Bush understands that national security is our number one issue and he realizes that, deep down inside, most Americans understand that, too. I'm ticked at Bush for the "No Child Left Behind" boondoggle of his first term and for the horrid senior medical payments monster.

However, I'm willing to forgive Bush of these problems because he's shown a backbone by not refusing to use nuclear bunker busters on Iran's nuclear weapons facilities. He knows that once Iran has nuclear weapons they will use them -- not only against Israel but also against portions of Europe. He understands that protecting America is his number one job.

TOPICS: Government; Politics
KEYWORDS: consultant; democrat; democrats; elections; klein; politics; republicans; time
Stingray:  a blog for salty Christians
1 posted on 04/09/2006 8:48:21 PM PDT by DallasMike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: DallasMike
"Of course, the other reason that Democrats lose elections is that they're wrong on the issues."


But, that's why they spend so much time on focus groups teaching them how to propagandize people.

If they ever became right on the issues...

They'd cease being Democrats.



2 posted on 04/09/2006 10:36:28 PM PDT by LoveDoc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LoveDoc

I always like it when after losing an election, a Democrat will say that they "didn't get their message out". In fact they did, but their arrogance makes them blind to the fact that the majority of people don't agree with the message. It is a self-perpetuating problem in that they then go back looking for better communication methods rather than changing the substance of the message... The moonbats on are calling for Kerry again or Gore again... Too funny...

3 posted on 04/10/2006 6:03:34 AM PDT by seamusnh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: seamusnh
"In fact they did (get their message out), but ...the majority of people don't agree with the message"

Truer things have rarely been posted.

4 posted on 04/10/2006 9:21:32 AM PDT by LoveDoc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson