Here is what we need to do. Find experts who will completely rule out the possibility that DU could have caused a mass casualty event. I would say that, but I am not an expert. Then we can show, if it wasn't the DU causing the cancer, what was it? Becuase these documents undeniably indicate that Iraq believed radiation was causing cancer. We can derive that it wasn't DU if an expert says it wasn't and we can derive that the Iraqi experts would know that as well. The whole DU thing was played up as a cover story for the nuclear testing. This might be the case, I can't know for sure. But if enough pieces fit together, the military might be able to convince an Iraqi to talk or even go check out the site.
this is a DU study done in Kosovo at sites where DU was used. Look under findings
"the corresponding radiological and chemical risks from all points of view are consequently insignificant".
These people are not being killed by DU. So what was the source of the radiation?
Excuse the interruption, Ray, but aren't there civilian seismic labs which would have data covering the time period of the supposed test? I don't think the Gov't would make available on Freedom Of Info Act the monitoring done during that period. You could check with U. of Colorado, I think, and the U.S. Geological Services.