Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Conservatives Say Miers Is Obstacle to Judicial Nominees
HumanEventsonline {Blog} ^ | May 8, 2006 | Robert B. Bluey

Posted on 05/08/2006 4:42:02 PM PDT by Cautor

White House Counsel Harriet Miers, the Supreme Court nominee who withdrew after a conservative revolt last fall, has allegedly vetoed several recommendations offered by conservatives to fill vacancies on federal courts.

The White House would not directly respond to the charge, which was made this morning during a conference call with more than 40 conservative leaders. Two people on the call—whose identities I promised to keep confidential—said they had inside knowledge of the recommended nominees whom Miers nixed.

(Excerpt) Read more at humaneventsonline.com ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: harriet; judges; judicial; miers; nominees; thisisablog
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-97 next last
To: Cautor

I was very strongly opposed to the Miers nomination. But it's impossible to tell whether this story has any basis or not.

The Alito nomination was more or less forced on the administration by the firestorm that the Miers nomination provoked.

Is Miers now resentful of what happened? Who knows?


21 posted on 05/08/2006 5:18:50 PM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
One conservative leader on the call said the only way for the White House to offer a real “new beginning” on judicial nominees was to bring in a new counsel in place of Miers.

Still moving the goalposts, aren't they?

Do as I say or I'll leak something nasty to the press.

These are the kinds of "real true conservatives" who are part of the problem.

22 posted on 05/08/2006 5:19:03 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: em2vn
As Limbaugh said today, the President isn't a conservative he is a politician. He proves it every day with stunts like the Harriet Miers nomination.

SHE WITHDREW HER FRIGGIN' NOMINATION!!

This pounding on Bush and Miers is just gratuitous piling on at this point.

It makes those who do it look mean and ridiculous.

23 posted on 05/08/2006 5:19:20 PM PDT by sinkspur ( I didn't know until just now that it was Barzini all along.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Cautor
I'm just passing along some news items.

This isn't news; it's idle gossip put forth by people who wish harm to this president.

It's pretty telling that you think it's so accurate.

24 posted on 05/08/2006 5:21:26 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

"It's pretty telling that you think it's so accurate."

Hey, it's news whether you like it or not, and I know you don't like it. Tough.


25 posted on 05/08/2006 5:23:52 PM PDT by Cautor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Still moving the goalposts, aren't they?

Do as I say or I'll leak something nasty to the press.

These are the kinds of "real true conservatives" who are part of the problem.

And they are all, to a person, too gutless to put their names out as a source. Trash Miers and Bush from the sidelines. Not one word of gratitude for Roberts and Alito.

Is it any wonder that independent voters thinks conservatives (exemplified by such outfits as Human Events) are angry, vindictive people?

26 posted on 05/08/2006 5:24:34 PM PDT by sinkspur ( I didn't know until just now that it was Barzini all along.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

Oh, I forgot to thank you for bumping the thread. Man the number of people reading this story is surprising. And with that 6 degrees stuff....


27 posted on 05/08/2006 5:25:01 PM PDT by Cautor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Cautor

It's not news; it's OPINION.


28 posted on 05/08/2006 5:25:32 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur

Whatever anybody does is NEVER enough; never.


29 posted on 05/08/2006 5:26:16 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

It's a news story. You're welcome to your opinion though.


30 posted on 05/08/2006 5:26:20 PM PDT by Cautor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
White House Counsel Harriet Miers, the Supreme Court nominee who withdrew after a conservative revolt last fall, has allegedly vetoed several recommendations offered by conservatives to fill vacancies on federal courts.

Hmm. After getting thoroughly trashed by them, they expect her to cheerfully approve their recommendations...

Maybe I'm missing something.

31 posted on 05/08/2006 5:26:38 PM PDT by BeHoldAPaleHorse ( ~()):~)>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BeHoldAPaleHorse

"After getting thoroughly trashed by them, they expect her to cheerfully approve their recommendations... "

Not at all. I'd expect Miers to hold a grudge and squash conservative candidates for the judiciary. Hey, she doesn't disappoint.


32 posted on 05/08/2006 5:28:02 PM PDT by Cautor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Cautor

As long as the gutless wonders doing the rumor-mongering won't give their names, it's THEIR interpretation, i.e., opinion, of what's going on.

It's the way we usually think about pieces concerning liberals and the Democrats.

I remember when people on FR actually use to HATE that, but now that they've got a few "whisperers" saying what they want, it's fine and dandy.

Talk about selling out your principles.


33 posted on 05/08/2006 5:28:37 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Cautor

why is she still even around?

thank goodness we got Alito up there.


34 posted on 05/08/2006 5:29:59 PM PDT by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cautor
Not at all. I'd expect Miers to hold a grudge and squash conservative candidates for the judiciary. Hey, she doesn't disappoint.

In DC, people don't get mad, they get even.

And some of the crap that flew about Miers is the sort of thing that I would not say about anyone unless I was willing to fight a duel over those remarks.

Bottom line: if this is true, conservatives have taken yet another opportunity to not learn a lesson about not angering people they need to be on good terms with...

35 posted on 05/08/2006 5:30:17 PM PDT by BeHoldAPaleHorse ( ~()):~)>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Cautor
We are to believe an anonymous source and dispose of Harriet Meirs?

I heard from confidential sources the two complaintants are RAT sympathizers. Of course, I cannot reveal my sources.

36 posted on 05/08/2006 5:31:36 PM PDT by shrinkermd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Bluey's article reads like something Doug Thompson would write.

And that is meant to be as insulting to Bluey as anybody wants to take it.

37 posted on 05/08/2006 5:31:38 PM PDT by sinkspur ( I didn't know until just now that it was Barzini all along.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

"As long as the gutless wonders doing the rumor-mongering won't give their names, it's THEIR interpretation, i.e., opinion, of what's going on."

Oh my. Now we're on to the name calling and foot stamping that have come to characterize your postings. This is a legitimate news story. It discusses an event that happened. I know you don't like this but as I said earlier, tough. I'm sure Harriet will get out of the kitchen when she's finished with the baking.


38 posted on 05/08/2006 5:32:12 PM PDT by Cautor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Cautor
I'd expect Miers to hold a grudge and squash conservative candidates for the judiciary.

She's certainly done a lousy job of squashing candidates. You're projecting.

39 posted on 05/08/2006 5:32:42 PM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd

"We are to believe an anonymous source and dispose of Harriet Meirs?"

I doubt you will have anything to do with it. But thanks for stopping by.


40 posted on 05/08/2006 5:34:16 PM PDT by Cautor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-97 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson