Posted on 05/18/2006 5:36:09 AM PDT by PJ-Comix
See: "Fitzmas"; "Counting chickens before they're hatched"
Hardly a regime toppler no matter what.
That's right. We save "DUmb" for you DUmmies.
It's possible; it happens from time to time. If he keeps posting his heresy he'll be tombstoned.
Ain't gonna happen. Wishful thinking. A desire for payback that will fit neatly and nicely into the next election cycle. Anger gets em nowhere.
Dolts.
"Karl Rove set him up. "
Never accept responsibility. Always pass the blame to Rove.
I wonder if Rove knows that the Democrats think he is a powerful god.
Pitt will stain himself over at Bukowski's, when he staggers into the little boys' room and has trouble finding the porcelain target.
"But sooner or later we need to stop making excuses for so-called Journalists who do not do their homework."
Oh no! You can't stop blaming Karl Rove. That would mean you would actually have to accept responsibility. Democrats accept responsibility for their own mistakes? That won't happen.
Naw, they're to stupid
"totally locked by the secret service "
What ever happened to the story that the secret service busted into the Truthout offices? I saw that on one of the threads earlier this week.
Hadn't heard that one. Willy is quite a Drama queen so I don't doubt it. It was most likely an exterminator that had to come in to clean out the cockroaches, but hence it makes for good drama to spice it up a bit.
An inebriated, 35-year-old, pompous, ponderous, frequently wrong, self-styled "journalist," the failed son of a failed Democratic Party hack, is one of your "brightest young stars"? You guys are galactically challenged!
LOL
Do the DUmmies realize that they may never see the Rove indictment if the military leaders whom they all cheered for leading a secret coup against Bush protect Rove?
Lesson for DUmmies: be careful what you wish for. Military coups aren't all sunshine and roses.
SD
"galactically challenged"
lmao
I suspect that PJ is correct in his surmise that Pitt's drunken rant against Skinner has basically made him fair game and protected his attackers from tombstoning.
PJ, I suspect that Fitz being what he is, a demorat shill, will manage to come up with some sort of indictment, however bogus, of Rove. Or are Libby's attorneys doing such a nice job of defending Libby, that Fitzie is all tied up trying to keep the one case alive?
It all depends on your definition of "retract." Pitt does backpedal. Pitt does flip-flop. Pitt does "recant," but in a way that he does not admit fault. See my post 29.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.