Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

ABC and Clinton: Caving to Pressure
Nuke Gingrich ^ | 9/6/06 | nuke gingrich

Posted on 09/06/2006 10:24:09 AM PDT by grandpa jones

I was Wondering About This.

And Hugh Hewitt provided the answer...(h/t no2liberals).

I commented over at GCP(#436) last week about the extraordinarily large amounts of search-engine hits that this website was getting, all directed to a specific article that I had posted about ABC's upcoming Path to 9-11.

Interesting thing happened today. Apparently some national organiztion is researching blogger opinion on next week’s TV show “Path to 9/11″ (which is very critical of Clinton, which makes me suspect that it is the donks that are out trying to do research to see if 9/11 is going to poll well for the mid-terms). Anyway, starting around 10:30 this am, I started getting hits for a cut and paste article of the TV show that I blogged a week or so ago. It’s been about 200 hits from search engines and IP’s from all over the country. Sitemeter is a gas!

Well, according to Mr. Hewitt, here's what it was all about:

The story here is the backlash that the Disney/ABC execs experienced was completely unexpected and is what caused them to question themselves and make these changes at all. Had this been the Bush Admin pressuring, they wouldn't have even taken the call. The execs and studio bosses are dyed in the wool liberals and huge supporters of Clinton and the Democratic Party in general.

(Excerpt) Read more at nukegingrich.blogspot.com ...


TOPICS: Computers/Internet; Conspiracy; Government; Miscellaneous; Politics; TV/Movies
KEYWORDS: 911; abc; clinton; editing
Yup, Sitemeter is a Gas!
1 posted on 09/06/2006 10:24:11 AM PDT by grandpa jones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: grandpa jones

So, I am confused. They did change it after all?


2 posted on 09/06/2006 10:26:30 AM PDT by rwfromkansas (http://xanga.com/rwfromkansas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grandpa jones
But at the end of their mad scramble, they found only a handful of changes they could make and still be true to the events. The changes are done only to appease the Clinton team - to be able to say they made changes. But the blame on the Clinton team is in the DNA of the project and could not be eradicated without pulling the entire show. A $40 million investment on the part of ABC is enough to stem even Bill Clinton's influence.

Doesn't seem like they caved much at all.

3 posted on 09/06/2006 10:27:33 AM PDT by Darkwolf377
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grandpa jones

IMHO the fact that Rush got/was given an advance copy of the original version made it difficult to edit without a trace.

He would/should be all over pointing out any changes.

Thanks for Rush - I find some of his show boring but it's for these situations he is a very valuable ally.


4 posted on 09/06/2006 10:31:35 AM PDT by freedomlover (This tagline has been pulled - - - - Okay?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedomlover
I am very interested in this proposed show, and planned to watch it, specially if the "changes" responding to pressure can be identified.

I do not easily willingly watch network "documentaries".

5 posted on 09/06/2006 10:41:53 AM PDT by Publius6961 (MSM: Israelis are killed by rockets; Lebanese are killed by Israelis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377
Doesn't seem like they caved much at all.

The only thing standing between a complete whitewash is the fact that $40 million had been put on the table(jmho)
I thought the real interesting part of this was the mad-dash to research web-opinion to see what the Right was buzzing about. I couldn't believe the number of search-hits I was getting...really skewed the numbers. Plus the fact that the suits at ABC decided it was important enough to give up their Labor Day holiday, just to appease the Clintonistas. Heh™ priceless.
6 posted on 09/06/2006 10:48:59 AM PDT by grandpa jones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: grandpa jones

Yeah, I was startled to read the positive reviews from Conservatives, and I imagine the libs at ABC just figured it would smear Bush because, well, you know, that's what movies and TV shows DO. So it's no surprise the execs were in a mad panic to protect their personal Ba'al, Clinton.


7 posted on 09/06/2006 10:53:30 AM PDT by Darkwolf377
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson