Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A devil food is turning our kids into homosexuals
World Net Daily ^ | Dec 12, 2006 | Jim Rutz

Posted on 12/12/2006 5:28:00 PM PST by Stone Mountain

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-150151-188 last
To: zook

Hi bugs!

Take good care of zook; there's no hope you know...


151 posted on 12/12/2006 7:38:53 PM PST by editor-surveyor (Atheist and Fool are synonyms; Evolution is where fools hide from the sunrise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: Stone Mountain

Dear Stone Mountain,

I know what you mean.
My wife and I decided to role play once after taking peyote and right before indulging our indulgences we rubbed warm soy sauce all over each other, just as a lark.

Everything was going great guns and roses until I suddenly had the urge to let my wife mount me during a reverse triple somersault, and my wife got the urge to beat me senseless with my electrified police baton. Which she did. And I strangely enjoyed.

It was some kinda trippy let me tell you.
The whole experience seemed kinda queer to me in retrospect, though I'm at a loss as to say exactly why.
Maybe it was the specialness of knowing the experience would never come again.

Anywho, soy made me get loved long time the wong way, as we say South of the Mason-Dixon line in Hunan Province.
Stay away from soy and soy products people.

Unless you want to go from being Stone Mountain to Little Grassy Top.

And that just ain't natural.

Sincerely yours,

Ted Nugent.


152 posted on 12/12/2006 7:42:35 PM PST by occu77
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: word_warrior_bob
Go to your local YMCA, sterotypes are sterotypes for a reason, at a glance you sometimes you think there's a woman in the shower with you, with them being so hairless as well.

Um, I'll take your word for it. My nephews go there for swimming lessons and no, they don't eat tofu.

153 posted on 12/12/2006 7:48:55 PM PST by Clemenza
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: toothfairy86
What about the billion+ Asians that eat significant amounts of soy products? Do THEY have a higher percentage of gayness than the rest of the world population?

Does THIS answer your question?

Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting

Cheers!

154 posted on 12/12/2006 8:25:36 PM PST by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Stone Mountain

155 posted on 12/12/2006 8:32:58 PM PST by Tribune7 (Conservatives hold bad behavior against their leaders. Dims don't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sam Cree
Japanese, for instance, don't strike me as particularly feminine guys. . . The defender of Soy!!!!!!!
156 posted on 12/12/2006 8:37:10 PM PST by Tribune7 (Conservatives hold bad behavior against their leaders. Dims don't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: PetroniusMaximus

157 posted on 12/12/2006 8:38:30 PM PST by BurbankKarl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor

Oviously, you didn't even bother to read the post you replied to, or you'd see I have a sense of humor. As far as this article, I don't see intentional humor, nor was it appropriate. Unfortunately, it's scientifically very naive. Plant estrogens are not the same as human estrogens. How come we don't see these scare articles about plant testosterones? In fact, they market them as ways to reduce cholesterol?


158 posted on 12/12/2006 9:21:05 PM PST by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers

Is that George Takei 3rd from the right? : )


159 posted on 12/12/2006 11:40:09 PM PST by Stone Mountain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: toothfairy86

"What about the billion+ Asians that eat significant amounts of soy products? Do THEY have a higher percentage of gayness than the rest of the world population?"

No, but I hear their penis' are smaller ;D!

sorry, had to say it...


160 posted on 12/13/2006 3:35:32 AM PST by poobear (Political Left, continually accusing their foes of what THEY themselves do every day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: dighton
Soy is feminizing, and commonly leads to a decrease in the size of the penis, sexual confusion and homosexuality.

I made this devil's food cake for you without any soy, using only real whole cow's milk and real eggs. I promise it will not do anything but increase masculinity, why, it might even be called the *Wonder Bread* of chocolate cakes in that it will "build strong bodies 12 ways."


161 posted on 12/13/2006 6:50:32 AM PST by MozarkDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Stone Mountain

Dr. Mercola - "Soy formula is one of the worst foods that you could feed your child. Not only does it have profoundly adverse hormonal effects as discussed above, but it also has over 1000% more aluminum than conventional milk based formulas.

Why Soy Can Damage Your Health
http://www.mercola.com/article/soy/index.htm

Soy May Cause Cancer and Brain Damage
http://www.mercola.com/2000/aug/20/soy_dangers.htm

The Truth about Soy
http://www.soyonlineservice.co.nz/

Beware of The Toxicity of Soy Products
http://www.shirleys-wellness-cafe.com/soy.htm


162 posted on 12/13/2006 10:09:14 AM PST by dcnd9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Charles Henrickson; martin_fierro

163 posted on 12/13/2006 10:37:28 AM PST by mikrofon (Is that martin_ up there??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: dcnd9
You're citing Mercola as a reliable source? He's just another internet charlatan out to make a fast buck from people who use the internet as a substitute for knowledge of science and nutrition. He's been cited several times by the FDA for making claims about products he's selling that have no basis in fact.

Mercola is no better at providing factual information based on sound science than the rest of your links. All this nonsense about soy is nothing more than alarmist propagated by the toxic terrorists who are either misguided scientists or charlatans trying to make a quick buck -- or both.

164 posted on 12/13/2006 10:54:08 AM PST by Mase (Save me from the people who would save me from myself!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]

To: Stone Mountain

Even worse, they've discovered a food that reduces a woman's sex drive by 90%. It's called a Wedding Cake.


165 posted on 12/13/2006 10:56:43 AM PST by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dat

I ate szechuan tofu today for lunch, but it does not make me want to look at some guys hairy @$$.


166 posted on 12/13/2006 10:59:42 AM PST by KC_Conspirator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Mase


"All this nonsense about soy is nothing more than alarmist propagated by the toxic terrorists who are either misguided scientists or charlatans trying to make a quick buck -- or both."
I assume you can back up what you stated here with proof based in fact.


167 posted on 12/13/2006 1:02:40 PM PST by dcnd9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: Mase

FYI:

"As currently configured, the FDA is not able to adequately protect the American public. It's more interested in protecting the interests of industry. It views industry as its client, and the client is someone whose interest you represent."

- Dr. David Graham, senior drug safety researcher at the Food and Drug Administration, and Vioxx whistleblower

http://www.organicconsumers.org/cgi-bin/artman/exec/view.pl?archive=1&num=947


168 posted on 12/13/2006 1:22:38 PM PST by dcnd9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: dcnd9
I assume you can back up what you stated here with proof based in fact.

Sure. Without linking me to endless studies from Mercola or some other alarmist source, what specifically do believe is dangerous about soy?

169 posted on 12/13/2006 2:25:05 PM PST by Mase (Save me from the people who would save me from myself!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: Monkey King

Hahaha, South Park flash - "So big!" ;)


170 posted on 12/13/2006 2:36:03 PM PST by Kaylee Frye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: dcnd9
It's more interested in protecting the interests of industry. It views industry as its client, and the client is someone whose interest you represent."

Good grief. You don't understand the FDA at all. The FDA is motivated by politics, public opinion and not making mistakes. Just because some researcher makes a claim doesn't make it so. The FDA and industry, for the most part, have a very adversarial relationship. They have nothing to gain from helping industry. The FDA treats industry as bad as everyone else.

They are certainly not perfect or infallible but they are absolutely light years better than what existed before. They are bureaucrats of the worst kind who sit on drugs and treatments that could save or improve lives because they're scared to make a mistake however, we operate better than any other country in the world.

BTW, I believe Vioxx will make it back to the market but with many more limitations, despite what Dr. Graham, disgruntled former employee, has to say. Of course, that's besides the point. Humans have been consuming soy for thousands of years. We consume more today per capita then ever before. Our health and life expectancy have never been better. If the FDA had solid research proving that soy was harmful, especially to children, they'd act on it. They don't because that research doesn't exist.

171 posted on 12/13/2006 2:36:54 PM PST by Mase (Save me from the people who would save me from myself!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies]

To: Gabz
I'm surrounded by soybean fields where I live :)

Better watch out, or you'll become feminine.

172 posted on 12/13/2006 2:43:33 PM PST by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Mase

Good grief, that was from the article, not me....


173 posted on 12/13/2006 3:22:33 PM PST by dcnd9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies]

To: Mase

Are you saying only the FDA has credibility?


174 posted on 12/13/2006 3:24:54 PM PST by dcnd9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies]

To: word_warrior_bob
With a handle like "Monkey King" you MUST be packing a lot of manhood!

It's good to be the King ...

175 posted on 12/13/2006 3:42:12 PM PST by Monkey King
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: brannon
and it makes free republic look bad when we repost this #$%!

....there is a certain humor value; I'm LMAO right now.

176 posted on 12/13/2006 3:46:49 PM PST by He Rides A White Horse (unite)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: dcnd9
I thought you posted it because you supported it. Is this not the case?

I've worked with the FDA on the food side of the industry and I would agree that they are credible, although they can be a bureaucratic nightmare. Our food supply offers the most variety greatest safety in the world. There is no love between industry and the FDA. From what I know about the drug side, their relationship depends on who is running the agency but that their relationship is also highly adversarial. You can understand why that would be when the cost of bringing a new drug to market is now $800 million. I am unfamiliar with the medical equipment area of their oversight.

177 posted on 12/13/2006 3:49:52 PM PST by Mase (Save me from the people who would save me from myself!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies]

To: Stone Mountain

Soy is also damaging to the thyroid. Women who are having problems losing weight despite diet and exercise should make absolutely sure they eliminate soy from their diet.


178 posted on 12/13/2006 3:50:25 PM PST by McGavin999 (Republicans take out our trash, Democrats re-elect theirs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stone Mountain
Soy is feminizing, and commonly leads to a decrease in the size of the penis, sexual confusion and homosexuality.

Baloney, I just had a glass of soy milk. Now excuse me, I'm going to spin some Striesand records and do some home redecorating. Maybe chiffon.

179 posted on 12/13/2006 3:53:04 PM PST by He Rides A White Horse (unite)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stone Mountain

Not only does soy contain estrogens, they are genetically modifying it on a regular basis.


180 posted on 12/13/2006 3:53:30 PM PST by television is just wrong (Our sympathies are misguided with illegal aliens...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lepton
Better watch out, or you'll become feminine.

Actually I think the opposite has happened - I seem to spend my days in work boots and jeans. Both my husband and daughter like seeing me in skirts and heels :)

181 posted on 12/13/2006 6:45:29 PM PST by Gabz (If we weren't crazy, we'd just all go insane.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies]

To: Mase
So why do you dismiss anyone else's opinions and/or research, that does not support the FDA's, as charlatan's etc.?
182 posted on 12/14/2006 6:00:46 AM PST by dcnd9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies]

To: Stone Mountain
Jim Rutz to soy: "You're the devil!"

Uh, okay, Jim.

/sarc

183 posted on 12/14/2006 6:03:57 AM PST by Silly (plasticpie.com, home of Silly humor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dcnd9
I don't dismiss everyone. Only those who employ faulty research methodology and those who use that research to further their own political or financial ends. You need to understand that most research today is done to find grant money and not the truth. Also, most of the message today is controlled by extremists who also have a political and/or financial agenda.

To separate what's legitimate from all the nonsense out there requires a substantial education in biochemistry and nutrition as well as having worked in real world situations where the accuracy of your research determines your success in industry. Too many people are quick to believe whatever they see on the internet because it sounds like the researchers know what they're talking about. Most of the time, after critically reviewing the research, it's clear that their conclusions -- although they may show correlations -- don't prove a thing. 95% of research today is meaningless. Mercola is an internet charlatan who is getting rich selling people crap that doesn't perform as advertised. He's been cited several times by the FDA for doing so. The Weston Price Foundation is another organization that's driven by a political agenda and cares nothing about the truth. Fortunately, the FDA, most of the time, creates policy based on sound science. That's reassuring to me in a world filled with food Nazi's, toxic terrorists and nanny staters.

184 posted on 12/14/2006 8:08:38 AM PST by Mase (Save me from the people who would save me from myself!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies]

To: Mase
A condescending liberal attitude really doesn't add anything to a discussion.
185 posted on 12/15/2006 4:49:12 AM PST by dcnd9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 184 | View Replies]

To: dcnd9
Is that all you've got? I suggested earlier that you believed in something you didn't understand and couldn't explain. You had ample opportunity to prove me wrong and didn't even try. Looks like I was right. Only conservatives believe in things that don't exist? I suppose if you really knew anything about the subject you'd contribute something to the discussion. Instead, all you've done is link us to wacko websites. Nice defense.
186 posted on 12/15/2006 8:39:23 AM PST by Mase (Save me from the people who would save me from myself!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies]

To: Mase

For those who believe no explanation is needed. For those who don't, no explanation will suffice.
Since I read you as the latter, there was no point in trying to prove "your opinions" wrong.


187 posted on 12/15/2006 3:06:40 PM PST by dcnd9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies]

To: Stone Mountain

Personally, I would suspect that childhood obesity has more to do with early menstruation than does soy consumption.


188 posted on 12/15/2006 3:17:09 PM PST by Old_Mil (http://www.constitutionparty.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-150151-188 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson