Skip to comments.Who’s fault is it that the ‘war on terror’ is so hard to overcome?
Posted on 03/23/2007 12:00:02 PM PDT by PRePublic
Whos fault is it that the war on terror is so hard to overcome?
1) The Islamists brain washers, from those that teach that non Muslims are Apes, Pigs, Cows, those that teach that the west in the enemy and one mush wage war on all non Muslims kafirs, those that instill extreme hatred & death cult to be glorifying death & mass murder over the value of any life, those that build up the fantasy on among young Muslims to be striving for an all out Islamic Caliphate, to be dominating the entire world.
2) Mainstream Muslim leaders, the normal mosques saturated with hate sermons & Satanic - Jihadism, even those considered moderate, no matter how far they proclaim to be denouncing terrorism always manage to find the explanation why Islamists terrorists commit the crimes against humanity.
3) The Arab venomous media that incite their world with true or fake extremely graphic photos of dead or injured Arab kids, without any explanations on Arab terrorists Hamas/Hezbollah/AlQaida inhumane tactics that are the main guilty party in causing it.
4) Last but not least, Those right over here in the west, (in the media or in office) that adopt perpetuate Islamists excuses, their so called grievances.
Each time you utter the occupation slogan or any other by that style of wording, you automatically give more ammunition to the criminal terrorists, their motivation & justification, they are only waiting for such statements from such cowards to be able to hang on to & carry one their massacres with even greater might.
Included are the anti American, anti UK, activists that pretend to be caring for Iraqi Arabs, or those anti Israel bigots that couldnt care less about the Arab - Palestinians but perpetuate their completely invented & self inflicted sick victim hood for either sole political purposes or plain old bigotry.
You can say it again, each time one bashes Israels, Americas, Britains, Australias (etc.) war on Islamofascism, he or she boosts up the enemy, the very enemy that would behead a liberal just as a conservative infidel, suicide!
As simply as that.
Good piece! I think part of the problem though is the Coalition of the Willing's conception of the battle. I firmly believe that the phraseology 'War on Terror' is misleading. As one academic (I forget his name) has noted 'terror' is the enemy's means, not the enemy himself. Its like WW2 being declared as a 'War on Panzers'. Furthermore, no matter what we do, there will always be a few terrorists out to harm liberal democracies. The 'War on Terror' in its current framework will thus be neverending!
I think that the threat should be regarded, as with terrorism in the past, a police matter. These Muslim fundamentalists that attack on Western soil are criminals, not soldiers. I honestly don't believe that liberal states are in danger of falling to these radicals. Anarchists have launched similar (though on a smaller scale) bomb attacks in the past that have fizzled out. The minute that any terrorist group organizes itself into an armed conventional force in Western countries, it will be defeated quite easily. There were arguably more Islamic terrorist attacks in the West etc in the 1970s than there are today. Yet we do not regard this period as a fundamental shift in world politics, like we did after 9/11.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.