Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies.
Locked on 08/14/2007 1:41:51 PM PDT by Admin Moderator, reason:

One thread is enough. http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/1881074/posts



Skip to comments.

GaySafety.org: "Lethal force is required in retribution"
GaySafety.org ^ | Aug. 14, 2007 | GaySafety.org

Posted on 08/14/2007 9:45:32 AM PDT by AFA-Michigan

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 last
To: RinaseaofDs

“Vatican City lashes out at the gay community out of frustration, because most historically Catholic regions of the world have wonderful human rights protection, ignoring the Vatican’s attempts to make them violate human rights.
The Vatican’s crimes against gay-lesbian-bisexual-transgender-asexual catholic and non-catholic men, women, and children have removed world heritage protection from the palatial estate of the Bishop of Rome, which will no longer be preserved, in accordance with the Archaic Structures & Relics Accountability Act. This leads to the larger question to be applied to all religions. Irrespective of a particular mythology, would the removal of specific religious sites and relics reduce human rights violations? If so, which ones? A study is conducted to determine the human rights impact of maintaining, or discontinuing, the existence of religious locales and artifacts. The findings help guide the best course of action for preventing and eliminating human rights violations by religiously-motivated perpetrators, the leading-shared demographic trait among human rights violators around the globe.”

Left column at:

http://www.gayhumanrights.org


81 posted on 08/14/2007 12:17:33 PM PDT by AFA-Michigan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: dljordan
Sounds good to me and about time. I don’t think I could join a “Pink Militia” though.

What do you call a bunch of lesbians in fatigues marching around with rifles?

Militia Etheridge...

82 posted on 08/14/2007 12:31:18 PM PDT by lesser_satan (Fred Thompson '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: AFA-Michigan
I guess the Gaystapo is officially calling in the Brownshirts--or should it be "Brownpants" in their case?

After all, the SA claimed to be a defensive organization too, you know...
83 posted on 08/14/2007 12:33:22 PM PDT by Antoninus (P!ss off a leftist wacko . . . have more kids.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lesser_satan

“What do you call a bunch of lesbians in fatigues marching around with rifles?

Militia Etheridge...”

Groan!


84 posted on 08/14/2007 12:36:51 PM PDT by dljordan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: SargeK

Sounds like the New Gay Army is looking for a few good men


85 posted on 08/14/2007 12:44:04 PM PDT by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: wideawake
Translation: murder the children of pro-family activists.

"Whom the gods would destroy, they first make mad." --Euripides
86 posted on 08/14/2007 12:45:35 PM PDT by Antoninus (P!ss off a leftist wacko . . . have more kids.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus

Antoninus: “The Gaystapo is officially calling in the Brownshirts.”

In fact, it’s historically true that Ernst Roehm, the leader of Hitler’s Nazi Brownshirts, was known to be involved in the homosexual lifestyle.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ernst_R%C3%B6hm

Even the CBS mini-series on Hitler a few years ago portrayed Roehm as being in bed with another man when Hitler personally broke in and shot Roehm.

A German historian at the University of Berlin also wrote “The Hidden Hitler,” presenting what he portrayed as documentation that Hitler himself was actively involved in homosexual behavior and killed Roehm to prevent his former ally’s threat to disclose it.

As reported by The London Observer, a major daily:

“Hitler was gay - and killed to hide it, book says”

http://observer.guardian.co.uk/international/story/0,6903,564899,00.html


87 posted on 08/14/2007 12:55:02 PM PDT by AFA-Michigan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory
actually it is directly out of the homosexual agenda that was read into the congressional record as a warning.

Yep, here's a link for anybody who wants to read it.

Of course the author(s) who wrote it twenty years ago claimed it was supposed to be funny. If so, it's the least humorous joke I've ever seen, and now we see in this latest manifesto that other homosexual activists don't think it's a joke at all.

Here's an old FR thread I found talking about Mike Swift's "joke".
88 posted on 08/14/2007 1:20:43 PM PDT by angryoldfatman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson