Fartknocker!
Posted on 09/05/2007 11:49:47 AM PDT by Jose Pen
According to The Washington Post, there are 33 names on Rogers' list of Congressional charlatans - 30 of them Republicans. If only one-third of these scoundrels get outed in the next two years, the earthquake on Capitol Hill will be so large that it may cause a war between GOP moderates and social conservatives.
About three years ago, I was lounging in a Montreal hotel room when I got a call from activist Mike Rogers. I was unaware of who he was, but this intense stranger began interrogating me for information about - well, I don't even remember what the topic was anymore. But, I do recall that he was about the toughest advocate I had encountered in quite some time. As I hung up the phone I thought, "thank God this guy is on our side."
In an era of softer advocacy, Rogers is decidedly in your face. Yet, he has integrated new media with old school activism to create a stunningly effective hybrid that has brought Capitol Hill to its knees. Well, the hypocritical, anti-gay Congressmen were already on their knees - but until Rogers came along with his "outing" website BlogActive, they were getting away with it. Rogers does not tiptoe (or is it tap foot) around the contentions issue of outing and has a string of successes, including the downfall of closeted former Virginia GOP Congressman Ed Schrock.
Since our initial conversation we have become friends. At his Washington apartment, he is a whirlwind of activity, fighting for a just cause with little reward. While our "mainstream" organizations have reaped a windfall of resources, Rogers, arguably our most effective voice, has had to scrape tooth and nail.
Unfortunately, the veneer of "respectability" often trumps results when it comes to supporting GLBT causes. With little more than willpower, Rogers has become a major powerbroker in our nation's capitol. This week, he was featured in a Washington Post article under the headline, "The Most Feared Man On The Hill?"
The downfall of Sen. Larry "Wide Stance" Craig has put Rogers in the spotlight, where he is finally getting his due. Months before "potty-gate," Rogers outed Craig for allegedly having sex at Washington's Union Station. Now that he has been vindicated (not the first time), he has gone from a pariah, in some circles, to downright prophetic.
In addition to the Washington Post feature, Rogers has made the rounds on CNN, NBC's Today Show and National Public Radio. He has earned his celebrity and his efforts deserve our full-fledged praise and support.
Still, some opponents - often in the GLBT community - have tried to smear Rogers as radical or loony. Sometimes, these slights are in the media, but more often than not, they are defamatory whispers at cocktail parties by those who feel threatened by his work. Far from radical, however, Rogers is refreshingly contemplative and levelheaded when it comes to the ethics of outing. He has a clear idea of where he stands and has been consistent in his rules of engagement.
"When those private lives are in direct conflict with the public policy that these officials espouse, I think it's fair game that their private lives be brought into this," Rogers told The Washington Post. "And I have a blog to do that with. Here's the question: What community is expected to protect its own enemies? Don't beat up the gay community, and then expect us to protect your secrets and your double life. It's just not right."
When one sits down with Rogers, it is immediately clear that he is unorthodox in his approach, but he is not a wild gunslinger shooting from the hip. He is smart, deliberative and obsessed with getting his facts right. Indeed, he has yet to be wrong in his outing campaigns and has corroborated evidence before he has gone forward. This mix of careful journalism and energetic activism is an exemplary illustration of how one enterprising activist can make a difference and change the world
Indeed, it is not Rogers who is radical, but those who perpetuate or enable the GLBT population's second-class citizenship who are the extremists. He is simply holding elected officials to the standard of truthfulness and trustworthiness they campaigned on to get elected.
According to The Washington Post, there are 33 names on Rogers' list of Congressional charlatans - 30 of them Republicans. If only one-third of these scoundrels get outed in the next two years, the earthquake on Capitol Hill will be so large that it may cause a war between GOP moderates and social conservatives. There is no way the Party can absorb, justify or explain an additional 10-30 closeted gay politicians and still claim to be the party of conservative "family values."
Our community should find a way to come up with at least $333,000 ($10,000 per potential hypocrite) to support Rogers' ongoing investigations. He is one of the few advocates who has consistently backed up his rhetoric and delivered tangible victories. If we do not give this hero what he deserves, then we deserve to be lorded over by Republican hypocrites who have built their careers by bashing queers.
“Bring it on, Butt Munch...”
Dont ask Dont tell
Out them all for all I care. I really don’t care.
Any chance HRC will be on the list?
Republicans would notknow even if there
where! I think this list is to be used
every election so they will bring out
two a year...around election time.
Lawyers standing by...press on rump ranger press on.
I guess knowing math and being queer are two different things.
I sure hope it happens.
I believe in Gideon’s Army.
Fartknocker!
Apparently 3.
Every time I hear about one of these explosive “lists” of “politicians” it winds up being a bunch of aides no one has heard of, some state government people no one has ever heard of, or a relative of some think tank/talk radio/web person.
Yeah, like a mentally deranged deviant has credibility with any sane person with a borrowed brain.
So he wants to wreck their careers by saying that they are.....like him?
The logic of the self-loathers escapes me...
The DC madam’s list is considered classified and unavailable to the voter - wonder what will happen with this list.
According to The Washington Post, there are 33 names on Rogers’ list of Congressional charlatans - 30 of them Republicans
I have a really hard time believing there are 30 closet gay people in Congress, let alone 30 Republicans.
That would defy the national stats on gays per number of people.
Unless of course there is a reason that gays are drawn to public office.
This is a new age. It is impossible to sweep things under the rug anymore.
We can whine and complain about the intrusive and tasteless leftist attack dogs, or we can be more careful about who we support at election time. Perhaps the RNC should screen candidates with background checks before lending support!
Ditto. The scum bag only hurts himself.
We are also told that there is no God and certainly no Judgment Day. If there were, God is so willing to forgive that none of this matters anyway, meaning that homosexuality cannot possibly be a moral issue. It is only narrow-minded Christians who insist it is, and they are just trying to impose their Taliban-like beliefs on everyone.
So, if there is no sin, nor moral issue, then why bother to “out” anyone? This is like a known jihadist threatening to reveal the names of other jihadists in order to punish them. It only makes sense if the gay activists know that the media will focus on the ones they out and not on the ones doing the outing. If the MSM were strictly neutral, this play wouldn’t move the ball foreword.
Can you not be sinful and still support family values with how you vote?
Homosexuality is a sin and as such, shouldn’t be put on a pedestal as a positive trait which is why these closeted guys are closeted. Shame is why they are closeted if these 30 are indeed gay.
And the number of dimocrats?
Pages?
Win at all costs no matter who you lie about. That plan might work. But then there is a coming judgment day. It won’t work forever.
Arguably, Mike Rogers extorted Larry Craig by threatening to "out" him if he did not vote against the confirmation of Samuel Alito to the Supreme Court. For this, he deserves the condemnation of all morally responsible citizens of this country and, at least, an investigation by the federal government to look for possible criminal wrongdoing.
--RedState
Extortion?
And yet, Rogers cannot point to a single piece of legislation Craig supported that would have made what Craig is accused of doing illegal.
So in other words, Craig was not pushing for legislation that he hypocritically violated.
This would be like calling a smoking lawmaker a hypocrite for pushing for public smoking bans.
Which is something many lawmakers, democrat and republican, do. Also drinkers who push for restrictions on drinking. Or christian and yet mistakenly supporting keeping religion out of schools.
You can be gay, and still not believe that the state should allow same-sex marriage, or grant special protection to gay people in hiring and firing decisions. You could be gay and not think that others should be forced to rent rooms to gay couples.
This is NOT hypocrisy. If a gay lawmaker is saying that homosexuality is a sin and should be banned, then YES, that is hypocrisy, and they should be outed. But if all they are doing is imposing reasonable restrictions on what the government does, their sexual preferences shouldn’t matter.
On the other hand, NO lawmaker should hide from the public something that, if revealed, would be considered harmful to them. That just opens them up to bribery.
Like Rogers, who has promised to keep this stuff secret IF the lawmakers vote the RIGHT way on gay matters.
It seems that such threats should be prosecuted as blackmail, and I don’t know what someone doesn’t take that tact.
If you specifically state that you are going to release harmful information about a politician unless they vote a certain way, that is blackmail.
And when we're done with Graham Cracker, we can set our sights on Arlen Sphincter.
according to this faggot it is OK to be an elected official in the closet if only you are willing to NOT vote in the affirmative on special rights for fags, AGAINST the wishes of your constituents!
So another way of looking at this is as blackmail.....in which the payoff is to obstruct “democracy” or “representative” government. Come to think of it, it SHOULD be worthy of an obstruction of justice charge.......
I thought this too. Are they saying gays are unfit for office? Or that they aren't allowed to be republicans? What they are of course really doing is exposing them, hoping that the neanderthals in the GOP will get rid of them simply for being gay.
List starts with Hillary — that would be good.
Has anybody collected Larry Flynt’s $1 million for sleaze on Republicans?
Joe McCarthy had a list.
Is this cuckoo puffs writer bragging, crying, or covering HRC’s derrier?
If we’re going to be the party of values, then our elected leaders must live them. Exposure is painful and can lead to short-term political loss. But I believe that it will lead to long-term gain for the country. I’m not sure what it would do to the party, but I don’t believe that the party can be successful saying one thing and tolerating another.
That would be bad for Mike...
Rogers is a slime.
nope, dems are allowed to be “out and proud”
Clinton’s money scandal must be fixin to break...
Somehow I see a fatal car accident in this guys future, or a fall from a tall building or a ‘heart attack’.
I think it depends on the voters. While I personally don’t like seeing homosexual Republicans, if they run as a Republican and as an admitted homosexual, then they’re legitimately a member of the party. If they tout moral values that includes heterosexuality, then they betray themselves, their constituents, their party and their country. Fiscal conservatives can be personally immoral. If the voters know it when they vote them into office, then they’re legitimately an honest Republican.
Proof positive that the politics of personal destruction is alive and well in the party in which is was founded....
This is an extreme example of pressur politics and lobbying abuse which seeks to use extortion to disenfranchise the voters of Idaho.
The gays that support this are all in a twitter over winning the white house and keeping congress in the hands of the Democrats. Funny though, none of the major democrat candidates fully support homosexual agendas. 
. Guess there's no going over that rainbow for them.
Oh man, this isn’t good. It is a drive-by orchestrated lynching so that they can smear the GOP for the next year.
The whole story smells real bad, like Larry Craig and urinal cakes.
They are all sitting on powerful committees and proud of being gay.
They are honored for being gay. It promotes the RATS agenda for votes to stay in power.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.