[DieHard the Hunter]

> Albert Pike’s “Morals and Dogma” gives me the impression that Masonry is a Supra-Religious or Meta-Religious organization.

Not all Freemasons buy into the random musings of Albert Pike. Me, I think his writings are those of a lunatic. That is the beauty of Freemasonry: because it is not a religion, there is no Dogma, and thus no requirement to observe anybody’s views as Holy Writ.

[VxH]

[That is the beauty of Freemasonry: because it is not a religion, there is no Dogma, and thus no requirement to observe anybody’s views as Holy Writ.]

 

Sounds an awful lot like "Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the law".

 

What's to keep this from becoming  Fatal Liberality?

[VxH]

[Me, I think his writings are those of a lunatic.]

 

Well, maybe he just got a little too much sun.

 

M&D seems to contain, among other things, a fairly accurate account of the history of morality and religious dogma.

 

Which parts do you find objectionable?