Flippers, Floppers and Frauds vs. Duncan Hunter, Part 3

News Which Cannot Lose ^ | 10/9/07 | Alexander J. Madison

[WalterSkinner]

..Madison could be a girl...

[AuntB]

Dang! Thursday nights is when I have this silly homeowner assn. meetings. Should be over soon...

Did you see this:

Thompson ‘Terrible’ in Chinagate Probe, Critics Say

http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewPolitics.asp?Page=/Politics/archive/200710/POL20071010a.html

[Calpernia]

Really? Than why not use Alexandra?

[Calpernia]

You can play it on demand too. You don’t have to hear it live.

Marking the Chinagate probe article for later. It will probably have to be added to this thread:’

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1814236/posts
Chinagate: The Movie

I’ve kinda made that my bump list on the topic.

[AuntB]

Thanks!

[pissant]

We gotta really start pushing. Now is the time!

[pissant]

*..the more I read about Duncan Hunter, the more I support him.*

A rare thing indeed

[pissant]

I agree. One very good reason to stand behind him

[pissant]

Just his plan to eliminate taxes on US manufacturing would do wonders.

[pissant]

I guess this Madison feller may be on the Hunter Radio tomorrow

[pissant]

Yep. I have yet to see him backpedal or obfuscate or flip flop either. The rarest of animals.

[pissant]

Yeah, I want a partnership with China too. It’s called Taiwan.

[pissant]

Donkey shane.

[Kevmo]

Maybe Dobson will endorse him. That would pull him out of the pack.

[Tolerance Sucks Rocks]

PING!

[abigailsmybaby]

A great article about a great man.

Thanks for the ping pissant!

[WildcatClan]

That is some real good automation in China. They have our manufacturing technologies and that’s likely where a great deal of their 15 million jobs went. Another great article from Madison, thanks.

[WildcatClan]

Automation is the secondary argument here. The point is the automation isn’t stealing jobs in the US. When the automation is being used in China the point becomes moot. Forget the numbers for a while and go to a Wally World and have a look. That’s the “point of sale” and the bottom line.

While the “free traders” on Wall St. can play with numbers as well as any and produce numbers, that on the surface, appear to be a rational explanation; Wally World is where the battle is ultimately won or lost. Go have a look, we’re losing. It isn’t all about steel either and you will not only be hard pressed to find a product made in the USA, but one not made in China.

Perhaps if you went into the soft-lines you might find the Dominican Republic, or El Salvador, here or there, but for the most part China dominates. While there, be sure to check out the toy department but don’t put any in your mouth. :)

[RasterMaster]

Duncan Hunter speaking with Michael Reagan right now regarding "free trade"....every time I hear that term used regarding the CHICOMS, I think of the "FREE CAT" photo:

I'll post the audio on my YouTube once they complete the interview.

[L.N. Smithee]

Here's the truth of the matter: Duncan Hunter can't get elected President until he rises to a higher echelon than "Congressman."

Each state has one Governor. Each state has two Senators. It's somewhat of a miracle if people can name all three figures in their state. On the other hand, members of the House of the Representatives number 435 throughout the nation.

Seven sparsely populated states have but one Congressperson; California has 53.

Governors have great advantage when it comes to running: They have executive experience, name recognition among people of the state, and they've already won a statewide election. Senators have national name recognition and a victory in the state, but only legislative experience. Congress(wo)men only have legislative experience, and it's rare that they are well-known if they are not either Speaker of the House or Minority Leader.

I live in San Francisco. Duncan Hunter's from San Diego. If I had heard of Hunter before he announced he was running, I forgot about him.

If Duncan Hunter seriously wants to be President, he ought to run for Governor of California after R-nold terms out. It is unlikely he would win a race against Sen. Feinstein or Boxer, who, I reluctantly remind you, received more votes in 2004 than any Senate candidate in the nation's history. Of course, Hunter would first have to buck the California Republican Party, which has been controlled by RINOs who cower in fear of riling the lefties.