Posted on 11/05/2007 3:01:24 AM PST by RogerFGay
1) “Monica-Haters” completely mischaracterizes the Clinton problem. Suborning perjury to protect himself against sexual assault charges involving other women, has NOTHING to do with “hating” Monica.
2) Pretending that 25% of “Republican women” will vote for Hillary is beyond the pale.
Repeal universal sufferage.
I don’t see how ANY woman that has any respect for herself, could vote for the Hildabeast.
This writer should leave the attempts at humor to Dennis Miller, Phyllis Diller or someone who possesses a sharper wit than he.
Leni
Humor never really came to mind. Satire perhaps in an effort to be thought provoking - not at attempt at comedy. I’ve read articles by this author before. He’s not laughing.
Maybe someday we will retun to a system where the best qualified person for the job gets hired, the best qualified college applicant gets accepted and the best qualified candidate gets elected.
As feminism rose in power we moved further and further away from an objective meritocracy and more toward subjective selection of favorites based on group identity.
No poll can be so accurate and definitive ~
The author doesn’t seem to recognize that the resmussen report is a spoon-fed turd by a Co. just trying to keep it’s name in the newspaper, it’s not grounded in reality.
The 1960s was the start of a radical trend in the US, which has resulted in the elimination of adherence to the Bill of Rights. Feminism jumped on that train big-time, and got a huge slice using underworld tactics. At this point, the corruption is so deep, it could be very, very difficult to get the country back. If it’s going to happen without civil war, voters are going to have to stop following these two political parties like sheep. The vast majority want the stuff described in grade-school history and government classes - they just need to learn how they can use their votes to get it.
Are you just saying things for effect? Rasmussen has one of the best reputations in the business.
I don’t understand your comment.
I truly believe they release some of these polls just to be in headlines and bring in more business. If it were just a poll saying “Hillary would win the candidacy” who’d read any more of the story or remember who conducted it?
Her husband won with a lot less than 48%. The only question is, who is going to be her Ross Perot?
Bill Clinton, at a minimum, violated his own policy and is guilty of sexual harassment in the Lewinsky affair.
I don’t believe this for one minute. Surely, 25% of Republican women are not this stupid.
I have never heard that type of thing.
These people continue to live in alternative univerese.
The piece is designed to stir up the greater part of the Republican base so they will take action to campaign against the Democrats and their Feminist lackeys.
You should take into account that Republican women are a very small minority in the first place (so are Democratic men and women, and Republican men); because Republicans and Democrats are a minority to begin with. The over-riding ethic of the two-party system is to maintain the two-party system. There is no relationship between party and political philosophy; nothing to create a party faithful rank and file outside of those who directly benefit from party affiliation. For most people, it does not matter which party one affiliates with or supports, so long as there is a perceived benefit. Many women could feel that it would just be nice to elect a woman president; just to say — see “we” can do it.
Keep guessing. You might get it eventually.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.