Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ron Paul '90s newsletters rant against blacks, gays
CNN.COM ^ | 10 JANUARY 2008 | CNN

Posted on 01/10/2008 2:16:11 PM PST by Extremely Extreme Extremist

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- A series of newsletters in the name of GOP presidential hopeful Ron Paul contain several racist remarks -- including one that says order was restored to Los Angeles after the 1992 riots when blacks went "to pick up their welfare checks."

Republican presidential hopeful Ron Paul's campaign has raised millions of dollars, most from online supporters.

CNN recently obtained the newsletters -- written in the 1990s and one from the late 1980s -- after a report was published about their existence in the New Republic.

None of the newsletters CNN found says who wrote them, but each was published under Paul's name between his stints as a U.S. congressman from Texas.

(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...


TOPICS: Politics
KEYWORDS: 1992; ronpaul
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 next last
To: bcsco
You ignored my 'yet'. I'm simply giving the benefit of the doubt for a short period of time to see whether he comes up with credible explainations.

That's a sensible thing to do, my clock took months to state he's a racist, despite knowing all about the individuals/groups he's connected with day one. In fact, I didn't believe it at first, though that lasted about 12 hours.

21 posted on 01/10/2008 4:10:59 PM PST by SJackson (If 45 million children had lived, they'd be defending America, filling jobs, paying SS-Z. Miller)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
"I am the anti-racist because I am the only candidate -- Republican or Democrat -- who would protect the minority against these vicious drug laws," he said.

One could possibly see racism implied in that statement. Does he believe these minorities are incapable of protecting themselves? Does he believe they need the white spokesman to protect them from the evils of this world?

A cornerstone of conservative thought is that everyone should have the opportunity to advance themselves, and be as successful in life as they can be. It would seem to me the above is almost a rejection of this philosophy. 'These people' need me for their own good.

22 posted on 01/10/2008 4:13:11 PM PST by bcsco (Huckleberry Hound - Another dope from Hope!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: bcsco
One could possibly see racism implied in that statement.

It's clearly a big government, "protect", statement with racial overtones. I cut him slack on many of these because I think he's a soundbite person, not a serious thinker. At least not in his verbal statements.

23 posted on 01/10/2008 4:17:25 PM PST by SJackson (If 45 million children had lived, they'd be defending America, filling jobs, paying SS-Z. Miller)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
It's clearly a big government, "protect", statement with racial overtones.

What's amusing to me, though (now that we've discussed the serious side), it's the antithesis of everything he preaches; small government, sticking to constitutional principles, get the government out of one's home. I agree that this one statement shows little forethought.

24 posted on 01/10/2008 4:21:42 PM PST by bcsco (Huckleberry Hound - Another dope from Hope!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

Didn’t someone post a shot yesterday of one of the most offensive letters (that Paul denies writing) showing him extending personal Christmas wishes from himself, his wife, his kids and grandkids?


25 posted on 01/10/2008 4:24:56 PM PST by Proud2BeRight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
"Libertarians are incapable of being a racist, because racism is a collectivist idea."

Interesting difference, Conservatives aren't racist because they believe in the individual instead of the label.

26 posted on 01/10/2008 4:38:41 PM PST by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Proud2BeRight

Yep, I am surprised the media hasn’t jumped on that yet. Someone who was writing his newsletter really went out of their way to make it appear Paul wrote it.


27 posted on 01/10/2008 4:39:42 PM PST by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: bcsco
Does he believe they need the white spokesman to protect them from the evils of this world?

Take out the racial component, does he believe people need the government to protect them from the evils of this world?

28 posted on 01/10/2008 4:41:02 PM PST by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling
Take out the racial component, does he believe people need the government to protect them from the evils of this world?

That's the basis of my post #24. It's the antithesis of all he preaches.

29 posted on 01/10/2008 4:43:32 PM PST by bcsco (Huckleberry Hound - Another dope from Hope!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: bcsco

Hadn’t gotten to that one yet.. This was probably the most telling speech he has ever given, and not to his benefit.


30 posted on 01/10/2008 4:45:15 PM PST by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Proud2BeRight
Didn’t someone post a shot yesterday of one of the most offensive letters (that Paul denies writing) showing him extending personal Christmas wishes from himself, his wife, his kids and grandkids?

I don't think it's offensive, but I admit Merry Christmas and may we start to confound the plans of the Trilateralists is odd.

Don't find that at Hallmark.

The good news, it's been over 15 years and the Trilateralists haven't taken over yet, Ron must have confounded them.

He must have, who else could have?

31 posted on 01/10/2008 4:48:39 PM PST by SJackson (If 45 million children had lived, they'd be defending America, filling jobs, paying SS-Z. Miller)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling
This was probably the most telling speech he has ever given, and not to his benefit.

But to what degree do his followers hear what he says rationally, and will it hurt him?

32 posted on 01/10/2008 4:49:58 PM PST by bcsco (Huckleberry Hound - Another dope from Hope!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

I think you missed my point but becuase I cannot understand what you wrote, we’re probably even.


33 posted on 01/10/2008 4:54:44 PM PST by Proud2BeRight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Proud2BeRight

It wasn’t an offensive Christmas message, just odd.


34 posted on 01/10/2008 4:56:11 PM PST by SJackson (If 45 million children had lived, they'd be defending America, filling jobs, paying SS-Z. Miller)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: bcsco
But it does seem he uses people and groups for his own benefit. And if he sees personal benefit in something, he’s not about to relinquish that association, regardless how it may appear to others. That in itself is a highly questionable trait IMO in someone running for the presidency.

It is certainly a valid question whether someone endorsed by Stormfront et. al. would have any credibility as a mediator in the Israeli/Palestinian conflict.

In 1960, a West Virginia voter told Hubert Humphrey "I ain't gonna vote for no Catholic." Without missing a beat, Humphrey told that man, "Then sir, I don't want your vote." In 1980, the Klan endorsed Ronald Reagan; Reagan was out front in loudly denouncing them and rejecting their support.

These are things Ron Paul has not done. He's waist-deep in bigots, Holocaust deniers and 9/11 "Truthers," and he hasn't taken a single step to distance himself. He keeps going on their talk shows and accepting their donations.

I repeat that I do not believe Dr. Paul is not a bigot or a conspiracy nut. But he does not make a move to distance himself from them. Lie down with dogs, get up with fleas.

35 posted on 01/10/2008 4:58:08 PM PST by ReignOfError
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

I cannot find the Newsletter yet but it was a newsletter very offensive to MLK that also included a personal RP Christmas greeting. BUt somehow he still denies that he wrote it.


36 posted on 01/10/2008 5:02:14 PM PST by Proud2BeRight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

Finally, I found it: http://littlegreenfootballs.com/weblog/?entry=28537_Ron_Pauls_Personal_Details_in_Racist_Newsletter&only


37 posted on 01/10/2008 5:09:55 PM PST by Proud2BeRight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
The idea that he was clueless for a decade and a half isn't credible.

I think he's been clueless far longer than that. He's like a puppy begging for scraps from the table and a pat on the head -- and he's desperate enough for the attention that he doesn't care whom it comes from. I'd bet that if I shot him a a couple grand, he'd let me open Ron Paul's Chicken and Waffles somewhere in Harlem.

38 posted on 01/10/2008 5:13:23 PM PST by ReignOfError
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Proud2BeRight
Thanks, I'd seen that. He denies writing the portion about MLK. Many of the newsletters are full of personal anecdotes, like the Christmas greeting. I didn't write this, but that, ???

If you want to read some of the newsletters, they're linked in this post. Fifteen or so in the first link, the other six are threads on individual articles.

39 posted on 01/10/2008 5:32:05 PM PST by SJackson (If 45 million children had lived, they'd be defending America, filling jobs, paying SS-Z. Miller)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: ReignOfError
I repeat that I do not believe Dr. Paul is not a bigot or a conspiracy nut.

By your double negative, are you saying you believe is IS a bigot or conspiracy nut? That's how I would read it. But the balance of your statement implies otherwise.

40 posted on 01/10/2008 5:42:43 PM PST by bcsco (Huckleberry Hound - Another dope from Hope!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson