Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Have Conservatives Failed America?
NYC Right ^ | February 12, 2008 | Ron Lewenberg

Posted on 02/12/2008 6:01:28 PM PST by rmlew

I don't mean to be a downer, but we've lost. And I don't mean the primary. The popularity of Obama among all groups and the increased support for liberalism and Democrats especially among the youth portend disaster.

Even if Conservatives were to magically retake the GOP, we are losing the country. Although individual conservative ideas are still popular, the American people want the nanny state to protect them, the government to provide or regulate health insurance at magically low cost, increased spending on all sorts of social programs and pork.

The failure of "big government" in the late 1960s to 1980 is a distant memory and about 1/5 voters were either not born then or immigrated since then. Meanwhile, during "conservative ascendancy", we have seen government grow along with debt, believing our opposition to these.

We complain about 12-30 million illegal aliens, but have not Americanized a greater number of legal immigrants and their children. (I am the exception, not the rule.) We have failed to teach our heritage to all American children. We have made fun of multiculturalists as these have divided Americans along race, class, and "gender" failing. While some saw the danger and fought rear-guard actions at school board meetings, far too many simply tried to opt-out of public education. Perhaps this retreat saved a few children, but the truth is that even students educated at home or in good private and religious schools are subject to the pressures of our sickened culture and Gramscite-dominated media.

The effects are real. How many under 35 can sing "My country 'Tis of Thee" with a straight face, or would even want to? How many cringe at words like Creator or the phrases "Self-evident rights" and "Out of Many One". How many stare blankly if one explains that the purpose of the Second Amendment is to allow for the people to overthrow an oppressive regime. How many under 35 get into a tizzy over profiling possibly terrorists, but meekly allow affirmative action? For that matter, how many over 35, conditioned by the media for years, have lost what they already knew to be true?

The failure to assimilate even legal immigrants is creating a balkanized society with aggrieved groups estranged from the founding principles of this country. Likewise, we have failed a generation of Americans in this country by not passing on the mores, tradition and heritage of this country. Is it any surprise the young and "New Americans" support Obama?

We Conservatives have chosen to passively list to talk radio and Fox News, rather than fight the battles that dominate our culture. As shown by the failure of the Bush-McCain-Kennedy Amnesty, we can fight and win, if we choose to. But this was the exception. Our "new leaders" are not independents. They are employees of multi-national corporations (Fox News, Clear Channel) or depend on these for exposure. Others are members of a political party, the GOP and thus have a natural tendency protect party and president over nation and ideology.

We, Republicans and Conservatives are playing to win individual elections. Meanwhile the left is transforming America, ensuring that they will win in the long term. We either fight this battle or consign our children to being strangers in what should have been the land of their birthright. The "New Jerusalem" sought by the Pilgrims has become Canaan.

People blame neocons and Rockefeller Republicans for the leftward turn of the GOP. However, it is only responding to the increasing liberalism of the American electorate, including self-proclaimed conservatives.

The GOP has not betrayed conservatives. Conservatives have failed America.


TOPICS: Politics
KEYWORDS: americalurchesleft; assimilation; conservatism; culturalwar; deathofthewest; formerdemocrats; gramsci; rinos; thecomingdarkness
Feeling pessimistic here.
1 posted on 02/12/2008 6:01:33 PM PST by rmlew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: rmlew

Yeppers.


2 posted on 02/12/2008 6:08:24 PM PST by Lakeshark (Thank a member of the US armed forces for their sacrifice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rmlew
Allow me to get very ethnocentric here:

It was a very special culture that created America. The rugged, do-it-yourself pioneer spirit was the result of a specific conjunction of individuality, pride, intelligence, and optimism that, frankly, is non-existent in most cultures.

Most cultures are tribal, collectivist, and have very limited goals: party and get laid. Even strict Islamists promise suicide bombers an afterlife of what? Partying and getting laid.

We are the last relics of a once-in-a-million-years mutation: a culture of self-reliance. The messy dregs you see about you are typically human. This is simply the jungle retaking the ruins. Nature. Be glad you got to see it before it was lost under the vines.

3 posted on 02/12/2008 6:09:42 PM PST by A_perfect_lady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rmlew

“But, as I gaze across the barren landscape of the Republican party, I can see only one guy who’s got any real ideas.

That would be you, Newt.” posted by: okie01

I’m inclined to agree. His baggage is no worse than the cleanest Dem, and he can point that out. What I don’t see is anyone who has the right stance across the spectrum of issues, who can communicate it, debate it, and sell it other than Newt. No one since Newt has been able to crystalize this set of qualities like Reagan.

The litmus test of true conservatism is whether the MSM holds you to a different standard.


4 posted on 02/12/2008 6:09:57 PM PST by DBCJR (What would you expect?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A_perfect_lady

And then the artificial intelligence of machines took over...


5 posted on 02/12/2008 6:11:21 PM PST by DBCJR (What would you expect?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: rmlew

The pendulum swings one way, then another. All hope is not lost....perhaps delayed, but not lost.


6 posted on 02/12/2008 6:15:03 PM PST by Wingy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DBCJR; rmlew
No. There is another - Yoda


7 posted on 02/12/2008 6:16:08 PM PST by FR Class of 1998 (I voted to defeat Hillary Clinton today!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: rmlew

We lost when we let the liberals take over the education system.

Now they are so entrenched the only choice is to abandon it and hope that the homeschooled generations can carry the baton of civilisation.


8 posted on 02/12/2008 6:27:43 PM PST by Valpal1 (OW! My head just exploded!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rmlew

It is mystifying to me that Barack Obama is rising like a rock star by proposing to solve the politics of hate and partisanship— which were implemented and carried out by his voting base.

It is surreal that this will be the basis of his victory.

Obama will allow his base to stop frothing at the mouth with their hatred of our Commander in Chief and our troops.

Wow! What a deal.

I still believe a huge strategic error has been made by conservatives that disaffiliated themselves with Bush. I think that made Obama’s coming route a rational ploy. Even conservatives don’t like Bush so Obama is doing everyone a favor by relieving this Bush of his command.

That is an absurd and hateful meme but for now it seems llikely to take the Democrats to the White House and historic high levels of control in the Senate and the House. Conservatives on these boards will largely not bat an eye because they consider Bush a traitor on the border.

I strongly disagree with the bashing this good President has gotten from partisans on both sides. I am no longer particularly impressed with what is deemed “conservative.” The enemy Bush confronted was more diabolical than the Nazis and is more diminished by his radical strategies than any known alternative.

Thank you George Bush.


9 posted on 02/12/2008 6:48:15 PM PST by lonestar67 (Its time to withdraw from the War on Bush-- your side is hopelessly lost in a quagmire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Valpal1
"We lost when we let the liberals take over the education system."

That's certainly one of the biggest reasons. The NEA has wreaked incredible damage to our country and culture.

10 posted on 02/12/2008 7:00:27 PM PST by VR-21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: A_perfect_lady
The slacker generation is now of voting age and will put their bongs down and turn off their Playstations just long enough to cast a vote for Obama. Then off to their part-time job at Starbucks and McDs. Then back home to their mommys basement.
11 posted on 02/12/2008 7:12:18 PM PST by Ron in Acreage (Jorge Bush has a 90% approval rating--In Mexico.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: A_perfect_lady

“Allow me to get very ethnocentric here:

It was a very special culture that created America. The rugged, do-it-yourself pioneer spirit was the result of a specific conjunction of individuality, pride, intelligence, and optimism that, frankly, is non-existent in most cultures.

Most cultures are tribal, collectivist, and have very limited goals: party and get laid. Even strict Islamists promise suicide bombers an afterlife of what? Partying and getting laid.

We are the last relics of a once-in-a-million-years mutation: a culture of self-reliance. The messy dregs you see about you are typically human. This is simply the jungle retaking the ruins. Nature. Be glad you got to see it before it was lost under the vines.”
___________________________________________________________

Yep. Now I’m depressed. The truth hurts.

And the author of the article is right. We didn’t do enough. It’s so much nicer to blame everyone else. I hate when that happens.


12 posted on 02/12/2008 7:22:12 PM PST by AuntB ('If there must be trouble let it be in my day, that my child may have peace." T. Paine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: rmlew

We had no real conservatives run a good campaign. As a result, it looks like McCainiac will be a minority selected candidate.


13 posted on 02/12/2008 7:26:25 PM PST by Blood of Tyrants (G-d is not a Republican. But Satan is definitely a Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rmlew

Read “Atlas Shrugged”. It will cheer you up.


14 posted on 02/12/2008 7:30:00 PM PST by Blood of Tyrants (G-d is not a Republican. But Satan is definitely a Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Valpal1

We also lost because the Rnc/Gop lost theyre way.We trusted them to do the right thing..


15 posted on 02/12/2008 7:36:49 PM PST by jd792 (love your country,but, never trust your government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants

What we had instead was the Thompson charade. McCain’s buddy Fred did his job of sucking up all the air so that no conservative could gather a following, and a lot of good but foolish and unobservant people fell for it.

It is not an accident that conservatives don’t have a candidate. This is by design.

But there are still 9 months left before the election. We can stew about and sulk over it or we can put all that energy behind someone who is conservative and running for President. This is 2008. We’re not dependent on the media anymore to get the word out.


16 posted on 02/12/2008 8:22:21 PM PST by FR Class of 1998 (I voted to defeat Hillary Clinton today!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: A_perfect_lady

To some extent, these traits were universally shared by all British Colonies. Aside from the US, traces remain in Australia.


17 posted on 02/12/2008 9:35:57 PM PST by rmlew (Huckabee flip flops so much it makes Romney cringe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Wingy
The pendulum swings one way, then another. All hope is not lost....perhaps delayed, but not lost.
I see this more in terms of the Hegelian or Marxist Dialectic. We get a leftist thesis, a week and delayed conservative counter-thesis, and a synthesis moved further to the left.

We now have Obama and Hillary representing a new thesis, and we have no response. 4 or 8 years fro mnow, the Synthesis will be leftist.
18 posted on 02/12/2008 9:39:26 PM PST by rmlew (Huckabee flip flops so much it makes Romney cringe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Valpal1
I understand taht desire. However, the left will still get your children if they watch TV, read popular magazines.
Far too many churches have become increasingly liberal.
19 posted on 02/12/2008 9:41:13 PM PST by rmlew (Huckabee flip flops so much it makes Romney cringe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: lonestar67
It is mystifying to me that Barack Obama is rising like a rock star by proposing to solve the politics of hate and partisanship— which were implemented and carried out by his voting base.
The message is vote for me and the culture war will be over. I will make the leftist victory palatable. And if you resist you are racist...

That is an absurd and hateful meme but for now it seems llikely to take the Democrats to the White House and historic high levels of control in the Senate and the House. Conservatives on these boards will largely not bat an eye because they consider Bush a traitor on the border.
1. The importation of millions of disaffected and inherently alienate future liberal voters and the Balkanization of America cannot be ignored.
2. Bush WOT is FUBAR. He refuesed to name the enemy at first and still refuses to understand it. He allows radical Islamists to control our security policy under the guise of PC. His "democratization" goal is allowing islamist to take power.
You want a Nazi analogy? Here's one. Amagin if instead of arresting all members of the German-American Bund FDR had made the FBI go through Bundist classes on German culture. Imagine that American school Children were taught about Wotan worship in glowing terms, and we spoke of Nazi-extremists and reached out to "moderate" Nazis instead of the German people.

Had it been a Democrat pushing these policies, we would all be screaming. But because it has been implemented by a Republican, we fall in line like lemmings.

20 posted on 02/12/2008 9:48:10 PM PST by rmlew (Huckabee flip flops so much it makes Romney cringe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Ron in Acreage
1. The Millenials are not Gen X. Also Generation X were not the slackers of popular lore.
2. We are up to Playstation 3, thank you very much. PS3 is not only a good gaming system, but it can be used a Linux computer and is the best Blue Ray drive out there.
21 posted on 02/12/2008 9:50:11 PM PST by rmlew (Huckabee flip flops so much it makes Romney cringe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants

Doesn’t wash. Have you looked at exit polling? Do you realise how many people think that McCain and the Huckster are conservative?


22 posted on 02/12/2008 9:51:17 PM PST by rmlew (Huckabee flip flops so much it makes Romney cringe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants

Joining the Cult of Ayn Rand will bring me no more joy than the cult of L. Ron Hubbard.


23 posted on 02/12/2008 9:53:08 PM PST by rmlew (Huckabee flip flops so much it makes Romney cringe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: rmlew
Meanwhile, during "conservative ascendancy", we have seen government grow along with debt, believing our opposition to these.

He's wrong. Those weren't conservatives. They were RINOS! He should be saying that Republicans are responsible, not conservatives! They are greedy, power hungry globalists who have sold America/Americans down the river to the highest bidders!!

24 posted on 02/12/2008 10:03:16 PM PST by NRA2BFree ("The time is near at hand which must determine whether Americans are to be free men or slaves!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NRA2BFree
1. "He" is me.
2. Are you calling Reagan a Rino?
25 posted on 02/12/2008 10:09:21 PM PST by rmlew (Huckabee flip flops so much it makes Romney cringe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: StarFan; Dutchy; alisasny; BobFromNJ; BUNNY2003; Cacique; Clemenza; Coleus; cyborg; DKNY; ...

ping


26 posted on 02/12/2008 10:35:43 PM PST by nutmeg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rmlew; nutmeg
We Conservatives have chosen to passively list to talk radio and Fox News, rather than fight the battles that dominate our culture.

I would also add that many folks consider infighting and clobbering others within this forum a form of armchair activism. Rather than using the opportunity to hone persuasive argument skills, Giuliani and Romney supporters were kicked under and off the bus last year. Allegedly mature adults resort to childish name-calling and shoot-from-the-hip attacks to what end?

Historically, the odds of a party holding onto the Presidency following two four-year terms are slim. As Gingrich pointed out during CPAC, don't focus on POTUS as though it is the only race in 2008. Use this precious time to support and elect conservatives to local, state, and U.S. Congressional races.

27 posted on 02/13/2008 1:29:50 AM PST by NautiNurse (Plants are people too)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rmlew
To some extent, these traits were universally shared by all British Colonies. Aside from the US, traces remain in Australia.

Yes, I agree. I do think the Puritan basis injected America with a little more capacity for self-denial and spiritual ideals than Australia, but I do think they are just about the only other country worth a damn.

For the most part, however, individuality is doomed, as far as I can tell. Sorry to be so gloomy, but I teach in a public school in Los Angeles, and the only real differences between Islamic cultures and Hispanic cultures, as far as I can see, are surface. One is more militant, the other more easy-going, but they are both ultimately collectivist, fecund, and unashamedly avaricious. They can't wait to swallow up other cultures and claim their accomplishments and accoutrements for their own.

I can imagine a not-too-distant future where the wars are between these two cultures, once they've killed the goose that laid the golden eggs (us.) One side battling for the right to have pictures of Jesus and do those awful butt-grinding dances to hip-hop, the other side trying to impose sharia, but both united in governmentally bestowed largess that will quickly devolve to fascism as the few remaining producers hunt desperately for some Galt's gulch to shelter them.

28 posted on 02/13/2008 5:55:56 AM PST by A_perfect_lady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: rmlew

Sorry, but the liberal/moderates and independents that have been trying to brow-beat conservatives into supporting the unsupportable have failed America.

It’s really quite sad that the liberal wing of the republican party cannot accept responsibility for what they have wrought.

My principles are not for sale.

I compromised on W and can see the spending record we have compiled since then. McCain was left of W in 2000, and has drifted further left since then.

The only conservative failure is having allowed the primary system to stack against conservatism.


29 posted on 02/13/2008 6:05:29 AM PST by MortMan (Those who stand for nothing fall for anything. - Alexander Hamilton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rmlew; nutmeg; firebrand; Clemenza; PARodrig; neverdem

WRONG, WRONG, WRONG

I have to keep repeating that conservatism is a movement, NOT a political party. Some like Newt Gingritch are finally realizing it. Most Americans legal immigrants included hold conservative values. It is the rule NOT the exception. The problem in the paradigm is party loyalty. When we ran Paul Rodriguez for congress against Nydia Velasquez we asked ten questions of most of the constituents we met. They were issues questions regarding family values vouchers etc. most agreed with 9 out of 10 questions. Positions that were supported by conservatives, yet they were too tied to their party identity to vote for a conservative candidate. Most people respond to cliches rather than reasoned arguments and that is dilemma we are facing. The elites in this country have figured that out and are playing the public like a fiddle.

Conservatives must realize they belong to a movement. They have invested emotionally in political parties and that is the paradigm that we must deal with. There are conservatives in the democratic party, as independents and the vast bulk in the republican party. The republican party was NEVER a conservative party. It was just a party where most conservatives found themselves. We need to learn the lessons of this experience. Our problem in the political landscape arose when political office changed from a civic duty and obligation and became a career.

Knowing this paradigm I always advise conservatives stuck in heavily democratic districts to run as democrats and in republican districts to run as republicans. Conservatism is a values based ideological system not as socialism and other isms a strict theoretical construct guided by a dogma. Once conservatives realize this they will begin winning again. We need to start an organized movement rather than a third party as we have no Reagan at the moment to bring together conservatives in the democrat, independent and republican camps as he could. We can only appeal to all three elements outside of the party.

Our obligation this coming election is to take back the house and senate. We have to show up at the polls in droves. If every conservative shows up at the polls we can have an impact. I will NOT stay home. Sitting out the election is not an option. I will however, not vote for president and chose conservative candidates on the rest of the roster on election day. If we elect a president, whoever that is , we must put him/her on a leash, a very short leash.


30 posted on 02/13/2008 7:36:17 AM PST by Cacique (quos Deus vult perdere, prius dementat ( Islamia Delenda Est ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rmlew

WEll, they are FAR more conservative than either Hitlery or Obama.


31 posted on 02/13/2008 7:56:15 AM PST by Blood of Tyrants (G-d is not a Republican. But Satan is definitely a Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: A_perfect_lady

Yes, it will be lost under the vines. My generation has no hope. As Baby Boomers, we were nurtured with the ideals of our history and the pride we took in reinforcing those concepts in our children. Well, they have grown and their children have become entangled in a society which values retreat in the face of any adversity and self-indulgence on a scale never before witnessed. Poor America. The Left has transformed this country into a nation of soulless sheep, not the NeoCons who lament what once was and what is fast disappearing. Their numbers have dwindled and they are powerless to reverse the course.


32 posted on 02/13/2008 8:11:08 AM PST by stanz (Those who don't believe in evolution should go jump off the flat edge of the Earth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: rmlew
Conservatives will once again "fail America" when they vote for McCain because he is a Republican. The liberal GOP has some conservatives in a perpetual head lock during every election season.

They know that no matter what, they can count on people to vote for anything that has an ~R~ after the name. Even Satan himself could get support with an ~R~.

It is time to take it one the chin and fight back. I am never throwing my vote away again.

33 posted on 02/13/2008 8:25:39 AM PST by Afronaut (RIght now Ron Paul has my vote. He has become the only choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ron in Acreage

The slacker generation is now of voting age and will put their bongs down and turn off their Playstations just long enough to cast a vote for Obama. Then off to their part-time job at Starbucks and McDs. Then back home to their mommys basement.

&&&&
Hey, the ones that actually have those PT jobs are in the minority among that set. Otherwise, your scenario is sadly accurate.


34 posted on 02/13/2008 9:23:06 AM PST by Bigg Red (Position Wanted: Experienced Republican voter looking for a party that is actually conservative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: FR Class of 1998

It is not an accident that conservatives don’t have a candidate. This is by design.

***
You are correct.


35 posted on 02/13/2008 9:27:39 AM PST by Bigg Red (Position Wanted: Experienced Republican voter looking for a party that is actually conservative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: A_perfect_lady

Predicted by Daniel Webster:

“Hold on, my friends, to the Constitution and to the Republic for which it stands. Miracles do not cluster, and what has happened once in 6000 years, may not happen again. Hold on to the Constitution, for if the American Constitution should fail, there will be anarchy throughout the world.”


36 posted on 02/13/2008 1:31:13 PM PST by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: FR Class of 1998
What we had instead was the Thompson charade. McCain’s buddy Fred did his job of sucking up all the air so that no conservative could gather a following, and a lot of good but foolish and unobservant people fell for it.

If Fred was on McCain's side the whole time, why didn't he stay in until Super Tuesday? His decision to drop out when he did almost cost McCain the election; indeed, even in retrospect, it's surprising that McCain won in spite of Fred's having dropped out.

37 posted on 02/13/2008 5:21:17 PM PST by supercat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: FR Class of 1998
What we had instead was the Thompson charade. McCain’s buddy Fred did his job of sucking up all the air so that no conservative could gather a following, and a lot of good but foolish and unobservant people fell for it.

If Fred was on McCain's side the whole time, why didn't he stay in until Super Tuesday? His decision to drop out when he did almost cost McCain the election; indeed, even in retrospect, it's surprising that McCain won in spite of Fred's having dropped out.

38 posted on 02/13/2008 5:23:33 PM PST by supercat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: supercat

Thompson may not have entered the race until relatively late, but if you recall, he was toying with entry for quite some time - precisely the time when the voters he attracted would have been most valuable to conservative candidates. Google “will thompson run” and you’ll get articles from early last year already complaining how long he was dragging out an official decision, which will no doubt refresh your memory.

So for nearly a year before the first primary, he was sucking up that support, only to drop out on Jan. 22... and support McCain, which you recall was the absolute last thing conservatives wanted to do - quite odd for the great conservative hope to pitch in with a man we all detest, no? Super Tuesday was Feb. 5, only two weeks later.

The point Thompson dropped out was also the most important rallying time for conservatives opposed to McCain... who then instead of focused on Thompson, went some to Romney, some to Huckabee, some to Paul, others sticking with Thompson even still.... You could not set up a more perfect scenario for McCain on a day full of winner-take-all delegates.

Fred did well for his longtime friend. He may well just have cleared for McCain the latter’s biggest hurdle on the way to being President.


39 posted on 02/13/2008 5:55:13 PM PST by FR Class of 1998 (Government vending: Insert Paycheck and Press '4' for English)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: FR Class of 1998
Had Fred Thompson stayed in a few days later, he would have gotten a lot of the Mitt Romney votes in Florida and allowed McCain to win there by a sizable margin. If Fred's goal had been a McCain victory, he would have been a fool to risk letting Romney win Florida.

I'm not quite clear where you get that Fred Thompson supported McCain prior to Romney's departure. A bunch of posters here kept claiming it, but I saw no evidence. After Romney's departure, I suspect Fred saw his endorsement of McCain as being essentially a formality. I doubt he was expecting Huckabee to still be a meaningful factor in the race.

One thing any aspiring politician has to learn is not to needlessly make people dislike you. Having people like you can be very rewarding, and so it's often worth making small concessions to achieve that. Of course, there are limits to what concessions one should make. Only a political whore would make the types of concessions McCain does.

40 posted on 02/13/2008 6:10:57 PM PST by supercat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: supercat

Romney was never a real threat - on the delegate numbers, he got creamed. He was also no rallying point for conservatives, as one of the RudyMcRomney RINO triplets. The unsuccessful last minute flight to his candidacy by some conservatives was due exclusively to him being preferable to McCain, which wasn’t enough to defeat McCain at the polls. And because the states were winner-take-all, McCain only needed to win by one vote in each of them to win the bulk of the delegates at stake the day.


41 posted on 02/13/2008 6:23:03 PM PST by FR Class of 1998 (Government vending: Insert Paycheck and Press '4' for English)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: FR Class of 1998
Romney was never a real threat - on the delegate numbers, he got creamed.

Had McCain not won Florida, he would not have had momentum on Super Tuesday. It's possible he would have won anyway, but if that's the case he would have done so no matter what Fred did. Fred certainly did not help McCain in any overt way.

42 posted on 02/13/2008 6:41:32 PM PST by supercat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: MortMan; Cacique; rmlew
The only conservative failure is having allowed the primary system to stack against conservatism.

That explains a good deal of our dilemma. States with too many RINOs and states that are open to independents lead in the primaries and caucuses now. There's something screwy when the donkeys are left with two hard core lefties in apparent fight to the death, and the GOP is left with some of the worst of the RINOs.

43 posted on 02/13/2008 6:54:53 PM PST by neverdem (I have to hope for a brokered GOP Convention. It can't get any worse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Cacique
No disagreements. And if you'll remember I went door to door for Paulo on a few occasions.
44 posted on 02/13/2008 7:02:40 PM PST by rmlew (Huckabee flip flops so much it makes Romney cringe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants
WEll, they are FAR more conservative than either Hitlery or Obama.
Wilkie and Dewey were to the right of FDR. Ike was to the right of Adlai Stevenson. None of these were conservative. Fusionist Conservatism was born in opposition to these.
45 posted on 02/13/2008 7:08:40 PM PST by rmlew (Huckabee flip flops so much it makes Romney cringe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
We absolutely must chang ethe Primary system.
No independents allowed.
Space out the campaign and stop catering to Massachusetts North/Vermont East.
46 posted on 02/13/2008 7:11:29 PM PST by rmlew (Huckabee flip flops so much it makes Romney cringe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
We absolutely must chang ethe Primary system.
No independents allowed.
Space out the campaign and stop catering to Massachusetts North/Vermont East.
47 posted on 02/13/2008 7:12:15 PM PST by rmlew (Huckabee flip flops so much it makes Romney cringe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson