Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Voting 'no' on Hillary, Obama and McCain: Is this the year for 3rd party candidate?
WorldNetDaily ^ | March 24, 2008 | Staff

Posted on 03/24/2008 9:38:28 PM PDT by EternalVigilance

Many conservatives are feeling left out of the 2008 presidential race, with the likes of Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama battling for the Democratic nomination and the GOP endorsement likely going to U.S. Sen. John McCain, who has worked with Democrats on campaign limits as well as amnesty for illegal aliens, and in 2004 actually was thought of as a possible running mate for Democratic candidate John Kerry.

Some prominent leaders, including Focus on the Family founder James Dobson, even have said they will not vote rather than vote for the liberal leanings of McCain.

So is 2008 the year when a third-party candidate would find some traction among those disaffected by the abortion, marriage and national security stances found in the records of the three front-runners left in the race?

Charles Lewis, national outreach director for Christian Exodus, is one of those behind the launch of the new Save America Summit website, and believes it's not only time, it's overdue.

"Even the national conservative pundits who have drunk the Koolaid have to say 'hold your nose and vote for McCain,'" Lewis told WND. "Not one of them recommended voting for McCain in a primary."

Among those joining in the effort are presidential candidate Alan Keyes, American Minute founder Bill Federer, Council for National Policy member Bob Fischer, Minuteman national executive Director Al Garza, Constitution Party founder Howard Phillips, Gun Owners of American executive director Larry Pratt, Minuteman Civil Defense Corps founder Chris Simcox, Operation Save America founder Flip Benham and dozens of others.

(Excerpt) Read more at worldnetdaily.com ...


TOPICS: Politics
KEYWORDS: 2008; christianexodus; constitutionparty; keyes; no; thirdparty
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-93 next last

1 posted on 03/24/2008 9:38:29 PM PDT by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Taxman; Ladycalif; chicagolady; Delphinium; Gelato; MountainFlower; roamer_1; Steve Schulin; ...

The whole article is a long read, but worth it.


2 posted on 03/24/2008 9:40:44 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (The first front in any war is the war of words.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

Bloomberg gave up on his plan to go independent for one reason: Americans do not want a 3rd party candidate.

America wants McCain over anyone else, and that’s what counts.


3 posted on 03/24/2008 9:41:39 PM PDT by reagandissiple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

Among those joining in the effort are presidential candidate Alan Keyes, American Minute founder Bill Federer, Council for National Policy member Bob Fischer, Minuteman national executive Director Al Garza, Constitution Party founder Howard Phillips, Gun Owners of American executive director Larry Pratt, Minuteman Civil Defense Corps founder Chris Simcox, Operation Save America founder Flip Benham and dozens of others.

Couldn’t find anybody sane?


4 posted on 03/24/2008 9:42:28 PM PDT by Patrick1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CounterCounterCulture; outlawcam; joanie-f; Badray; Blue Collar Republican

ping...


5 posted on 03/24/2008 9:43:03 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (The first front in any war is the war of words.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: reagandissiple
America wants McCain over anyone else, and that’s what counts.

What about you?

6 posted on 03/24/2008 9:44:19 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (The first front in any war is the war of words.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Patrick1

Count me among the insane then. Though I think it is the other way around. I think it is insane to vote for McCain in the vain hope that he is better than the other two.


7 posted on 03/24/2008 9:44:26 PM PDT by Ingtar (Haley Barbour 2012, Because he has experience in Disaster Recovery. - ejonesie22)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Patrick1
Couldn’t find anybody sane?

It's always the crazy folks who gotta pull you sane people out of the fire.

8 posted on 03/24/2008 9:45:48 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (The first front in any war is the war of words.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: reagandissiple
Bloomberg gave up on his plan to go independent for one reason: Americans do not want a 3rd party candidate.

Actually he gave it up because there's already going to be four liberals on the ballot in November.

9 posted on 03/24/2008 9:48:03 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (The first front in any war is the war of words.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

A conservative third party candidate will not work unless there are countervailing liberal third parties that dilute the votes in a general presidential election, which would give the conservative 3rd party a chance to win. So the answer is no to a third party... for now.


10 posted on 03/24/2008 9:48:14 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

Nader is running independent, and the crazy lady, Cynthia McKinney, is going to be on the Green Party ballot.


11 posted on 03/24/2008 9:49:13 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (The first front in any war is the war of words.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: AFA-Michigan

ping...


12 posted on 03/24/2008 9:51:11 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (The first front in any war is the war of words.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
Is this the year for 3rd party candidate?

Has former president Ross Perot weighed in on this?

13 posted on 03/24/2008 9:52:04 PM PDT by smoothsailing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

Will the Presidential ballots be marked with “None of the Above”?

I feel like I woke up in the Bizarro World.


14 posted on 03/24/2008 9:54:09 PM PDT by exit82 (People get the government they deserve. And they are about to get it--in spades.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
I doubt that the Green Party and Nader will win enough votes to justify a serious conservative 3rd party run in this upcoming presidential election.
15 posted on 03/24/2008 9:54:16 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
Hillary/Nader 2009- Consensus is in--- NO FURTHER DEBATE, Pleeese!
16 posted on 03/24/2008 9:55:03 PM PDT by Mark (REMEMBER: Mean spirited, angry remarks against my postings won't feed even one hungry child.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

without the crossover voting allowed in primaries would mccain have won the GOP nomination ?


17 posted on 03/24/2008 9:55:15 PM PDT by kingattax (99 % of liberals give the rest a bad name)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ingtar
Okay. Here we go again. For the Duncan Hunter crowd on Free Republic some questions and observations. Who is the candidate of this new party? Keyes? Hunter? J.D. Hayworth? Come on what a bunch of crap. What is the point of having a candidate who will get fewer votes than Ralph Nader?

It is really a serious observation to say that McCain is the same as the corrupt Hillary Clinton and the socialist Hussein? Is McCain's position on the war against Islamo Fascism the same as Clinton's and Obama’s? If the answer is no then we don't need a third losing party.

18 posted on 03/24/2008 9:55:26 PM PDT by Patrick1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

I, for one, could care less what Ross Perot thinks. He was never a conservative.

Actually, now that you mention it, though, John McCain reminds me of Perot.


19 posted on 03/24/2008 9:55:41 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (The first front in any war is the war of words.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

All they need, or want, to do is pull enough votes in Florida and California to seem relevant.

And that just may happen, especially in Florida.


20 posted on 03/24/2008 9:57:28 PM PDT by SlapHappyPappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: kingattax

Most likely, yes.

The Dem turnout in their primaries was huge. I sincerely doubt the crossover to the Republicans was as much as many would like to think it was. Believe it or not, the Dems were, and probably still are, very excited about voting in their own primaries.


21 posted on 03/24/2008 9:59:50 PM PDT by SlapHappyPappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: kingattax

Respectfully, I consider that a moot question. Why? Because the Republican leadership gave control over the vetting of our candidates and the setting of the terms of the debate to the Democrat Media. To make a long story short, that’s why the formerly Grand Old Party ended up with a Democrat nominee.


22 posted on 03/24/2008 10:01:06 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (The first front in any war is the war of words.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
Perot was the most successful third party candidate in my lifetime, and I've always wondered where his Presidential Library is located.
23 posted on 03/24/2008 10:01:47 PM PDT by smoothsailing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

Well, the Democrats and Republicans have never nominated such duds, either.


24 posted on 03/24/2008 10:03:48 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (The first front in any war is the war of words.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

with the question i was trying to promote some discussion about crossover voting in the primaries. thanks EV.


25 posted on 03/24/2008 10:14:20 PM PDT by kingattax (99 % of liberals give the rest a bad name)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: kingattax

Sorry. I just had a different focus.

Open primaries are just plain stupid.

That would like being in a war and letting the enemy help choose your generals.


26 posted on 03/24/2008 10:16:11 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (The first front in any war is the war of words.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel
"A conservative third party candidate will not work unless there are countervailing liberal third parties that dilute the votes in a general presidential election"

Is Ralph Nader running as third party? Didn't he consider running?

27 posted on 03/24/2008 10:16:28 PM PDT by matthew fuller (United We Stand- Diversified We Fall)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Patrick1

Couldn’t find anybody sane?

Opinions are like hinies, we all have one!


28 posted on 03/24/2008 10:16:37 PM PDT by garylmoore (Faith is the assurance of things unseen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Ingtar

Yep, you’re insane


29 posted on 03/24/2008 10:18:20 PM PDT by norge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
Well, the Democrats and Republicans have never nominated such duds, either.

Of course they have, and often. In too many elections we are left choosing the lesser dud.

Anyway, EV, I'm off for the night, have fun with your thread. :)

30 posted on 03/24/2008 10:20:24 PM PDT by smoothsailing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

That’s the opinion I have of the process as well — why in the world would you let a Democrat vote for which Republican will be up against their candidate? Now THAT’s insanity!


31 posted on 03/24/2008 10:22:23 PM PDT by LibertyRocks (The Liberty Rocks Blog - http://libertyrocks.wordpress.com ~ also see; http://www.libertyrocks.us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

i agree with you completely


32 posted on 03/24/2008 10:28:04 PM PDT by kingattax (99 % of liberals give the rest a bad name)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

Have a great evening!


33 posted on 03/24/2008 10:28:21 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (The first front in any war is the war of words.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: kingattax; LibertyRocks

I spend part of my time working in Idaho, where our conservative Republican friends, after much battling with RINO party leadership, have finally managed to close their primary. It’s about time.


34 posted on 03/24/2008 10:32:08 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (The first front in any war is the war of words.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
Is this the year for 3rd party candidate?

No.

35 posted on 03/24/2008 10:34:17 PM PDT by XR7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: XR7

We have no choice, since all that the Republicans and the Democrats are offering are George Soros purchases.


36 posted on 03/24/2008 10:36:26 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (The first front in any war is the war of words.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
First thing — a third party is stupid if it's going to compete with one of the other parties for a losing fraction. A third party would want need to have the first intention of putting one of the other parties out of business eventually but co-existing with them in the beginning.

The way to replace the GOP with a true conservative party, the only reasonable way, is to recruit the already elected conservative Republicans to the new party and then you have an instant political party without a vote being cast.

From there, the new party cuts a deal with the Republicans to only challenge their most egregious rino incumbents if they agree not to challenge the conservative incumbents of the new party. It would be absurd for the Republicans to challenge a conservative incumbent since they'd never win the seat and could only help a Democrat get elected. Such an action would only cause the Republican dead-enders to jump ship to the new party.

It can be done, but it requires some planning and less emotion.

37 posted on 03/24/2008 10:36:46 PM PDT by Perchant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

all of it needs to be closed


38 posted on 03/24/2008 10:41:56 PM PDT by kingattax (99 % of liberals give the rest a bad name)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Perchant

You make very good points, ones I’ve certainly considered for a long time.

Two things are true for me in this general election: I will not support John McCain under any circumstances, and I WILL support true conservatives at every level, with no regard to party.


39 posted on 03/24/2008 10:50:08 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (The first front in any war is the war of words.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
Is this the year for 3rd party candidate?

Yes, it is. But the key IMHO, is the Christians. It sounds as though they are attempting to mobilize through the Christian networks, which is exactly the thing to do. If Dobson and a few other Christian leaders get on board, this thing is gonna fly. If the Christians settle in behind one candidate and get his numbers (votes and $$m) into double digits (think Huck), the rest will take care of itself.

Yet another very serious issue, and one the Christians must pay attention to, is that the nominee must be a Reagan Conservative, capable of drawing from all three pillars of Conservatism. This is paramount, as Huckabee's run proved- The Christians can haul 'em outta' the basement and get them seen, but they cannot provide a win for the candidate without the rest of the Conservative community behind them.

This is critically important, because a third party candidate will be fighting heavy Republicanism all the way, and must be able to speak to the hearts of all conservatives to get tem to leave the Pubbies in droves. If they get past the "3rd parties can't win" crowd, the win is very possible.

40 posted on 03/24/2008 10:53:08 PM PDT by roamer_1 (Conservative always, Republican no more.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

There are more leftist third parties than right-wing ones.

Left wing: Democrats, Greens, Communists, Workers’ World Socialist, and now Republican

Right wing: Constitution, Libertarian, Natural Law (I think)


41 posted on 03/24/2008 10:57:15 PM PDT by Content Provider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: roamer_1

I agree on all points.

A very insightful post.


42 posted on 03/24/2008 10:57:16 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (The first front in any war is the war of words.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

I agree,I protested in the primary,but now it’s McCain or Hillary or obama or even Gore or a combination of them,,geesh!
start the conservative movement AFTER the election.


43 posted on 03/24/2008 10:58:53 PM PDT by coalman (type to slow to be relevant,but I try)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: coalman

I just don’t understand your “logic.”


44 posted on 03/24/2008 10:59:59 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (The first front in any war is the war of words.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Patrick1
What's the point in defeating Terrorists in the Middle East, when they can cross the borders at will? That's not apt to change with McCain.

I've voted against McCain so many times I don't know if I can bring myself to change. If you want to vote for him I'll not try to change your mind.

45 posted on 03/24/2008 11:01:38 PM PDT by c-b 1 (Reporting from behind enemy lines, in occupied AZTLAN.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

Unlikely to make a difference in 2008. We are laying the groundwork for 2012.

http://falconparty.com/


46 posted on 03/24/2008 11:01:51 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reagandissiple
Bloomberg gave up on his plan to go independent for one reason: Americans do not want a 3rd party candidate.

Bloomberg gave up because America doesn't want him.

America wants McCain over anyone else, and that’s what counts.

Well, then, America must be stupid.

I'll take a third party candidate because I absolutely refuse to vote for McCain.

47 posted on 03/24/2008 11:01:58 PM PDT by upsdriver (My kingdom for an acceptable presidential candidate!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

Forget the 3rd party candidate, draft JC Watts.


48 posted on 03/24/2008 11:02:51 PM PDT by BJungNan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Nice, but I don’t think we have that long.


49 posted on 03/24/2008 11:04:42 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (The first front in any war is the war of words.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: BJungNan

Draft him for what? Sorry, I don’t get it.


50 posted on 03/24/2008 11:05:17 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (The first front in any war is the war of words.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-93 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson