Posted on 06/17/2008 8:01:06 AM PDT by ConservativeMajority
Last week, the campaign of presumptive Democratic presidential nominee Barack Obama announced that it had established a “war room” to battle rumors spread on the Internet and amplified by other media reporting. Obama supporters will use a website titled “Fight the Smears” to identify allegedly untrue statements about their candidate and provide evidence in an effort to refute them. That sounds like a good public relations strategy, but the implementation will ultimately have a negative impact on Obama.
The campaign employs the Media Matters for America model for dealing with so-called “smears.” In fact, Obama’s war room uses the George Soros-funded organization to discern “misinformation.” Then Obama’s “flying monkeys,” a reference to creatures from the children’s classic “Wizard of Oz”, attack the source or any media outlet, talk radio host, online discussion forum or blogger that makes reference to it.
Obama’s flying monkeys are targeting the National Press Club (of which I am a member) because a man named Larry Sinclair reserved a meeting room to hold a press conference on Wednesday, June 18. Earlier this year, Sinclair released a YouTube video in which he made claims about sharing sex and drugs with Barack Obama. A lefty blogger has circulated a petition and launched a telephone campaign urging the National Press Club not to allow Sinclair to speak there.
The charges do not sound credible, however the ferocity with which Obama’s flying monkeys are trying to silence Sinclair gives me pause. If this guy is a lunatic or liar as his critics say, what better forum to discredit him than before the Washington press corps?
Obama’s flying monkeys have flooded the National Press Club blogs with their typically vicious and obscene comments. This is the part that will ultimately damage Barack Obama. The candidate of “hope” and “change” cannot have his hateful minions ferociously attack anyone who criticizes him.
I have a great deal of experience with the Media Matters goon squad and its acolytes. Their vitriol is as caustic today as it was in January 2005 when I first asked “The Question.” There has been no limit to their smears, libel and slander.
Barack Obama may be a gentle man, but he has surrounded himself with questionable characters like corrupt developer Tony Rezko, racists Rev. Jeremiah Wright and Father Michael Pfleger, domestic terrorist William Ayers and terrorist-supporting Code Pink co-founder Jodie Evans, to name just a few.
The Founding Fathers thought freedom of speech was so important that they enshrined it in the First Amendment. To the Left however, free speech is only for those who share its point of view. Anyone who disagrees, the Left seeks to silence through speech codes or intimidation.
America is going to get a close-up view of how those on the Left view the basic freedoms they claim to cherish courtesy of Obama’s flying monkeys.
I hear their war room is in operation in all 57 states.
Obama and monkeys and the same title. RACIST!
Did they fly out of his arse?
“Obama’s flying monkeys” ???
How racist.
Apologize and resign . . . now.
/s
I meant to type smear but spear works too.
Referring to Obama’s war room as a flying monkeys is appropriate, but I see them trying to twist that into a racial slur.
Flying monkeys will become the new American GESTAPO under the Obeyme administration. Coming up next: criminalizing conservative talk radio and imposing China-like internet restrictions.
Phwew! I thought for a minute you were calling Obama a spear-chucker!
Just wait, soon a simple "good morning" will be considered racist! PC has become a WMD.
That may be the point of the article, to call attention to the over-the-top reaction from Obama supporters.
I’m mildly surprised Barry’s people are taking on Lunatic Larry. Larry must be doing back flips over this.
Bad move by Barry. Larry is a lunatic that needs to be ignored.
I agree with that. I took constitutional law 25 years ago and thought back then that since the supremes could make the law whatever they wanted, it could not be long before anything the libs don’t want to hear became hate speech.
Interesting...they haven’t yet listed the supposed lie spread by Larry Sinclair on their fight the smears website. Yet, they are attacking behind the scenes in full lunatic mode to keep him off the air. Sounds more like Communism every day.
The left is going to get a taste of how it feels to be Mark Foleyed. In spades.
And hate speech laws will effectively be used to outlaw the Bible. Liberals are nothing more than a bunch of book-burning, anti-free speech hypocrites. Their idea of free speech is showing off their genitles.
Monkeys?!
Sounds like a job for “Annie Oakley” aka “Rocky”.
That’s his half brother’s occupation.
Jeff, don’t know if you have read extensively on the Larry Sinclair saga, but the left started their disinformation campaign on Larry right off the bat, and I have reason to believe it is being at coordinated at high levels in the DNC and/or camp Obama.
Just look at the fact that Whitehouse.com managed to schedule a hastily arranged presser to follow Sinclair’s tomorrow. Why would a purported news organization (former porn site) all the sudden be so willing to share the results/video of the polygraph that it had months ago decided was not worth sharing? Because their motivation has always been to sandbag him in any way they could.
Is it OK for Rush to talk about the National Press Club bookings on Wednesday?
ROFL
Racist Freudian slip, I’m sure. LOL
Really, really, reallly racist!
If that were so, there would not be coordinated attacks coming from all angles at Sinclair. Where there is pole smoking, there’s fire.
Your argument does not hold water, Mr. Gannon.
The National Press Club was never flooded with "vicious and obscene comments" before, was it?
With Obama, the National Press Club is being flooded with "vicious and obscene comments", right?
That's "Change".
You hope that the "vicious and obscene comments" stop, right?
That's "Hope".
Therefore, the candidate of “Hope” and “Change” CAN have his hateful minions ferociously attack anyone who criticizes him.
Yes. The BIGGEST ‘smear’ of them all, and the flying monkeys are fighting it instead under the radar, or trying to anyway. Tells you everything you need to know.
Rush could be away on a golfing vacation and he’d still get the blame.
Comment:
“Barry's people”.
Wow! a Freeper on first name basis with the most dangerous nincompoop in one Barracks Hussein Obama in America.
“Larry is a lunatic that needs to be ignored”.
Larry may well be a lunatic, that I do not disagree with.
However, that said, I consider most people who enjoy child porn sites, anal sex and sucking on lollipops to be just a tad on the fruiti lunatic side.
Larry certainly seems to be the embodiment of what the new Democrat party cherishes for members.
BTW, how do you know Larry is lying?
Yeah, I’ve been accused of being a paid Democrat operative in FReeper land. That’s fine. I guess my point is that Larry’s tale is pretty insane. I have no idea whether he’s lying or not. But I do know that Barry’s “flying monkey’s” are going to end up making Larry a real issue if they go after him the way they are.
Which is a mistake, if they want to win in November.
mark
It is a mistake, and some freepers intend to capitalize on it.
Some don’t or won’t.
They bring a Foley, we bring a Sinclair.
I call Obama the poop filled pinata because he's so full of it that every time you whack him poop flies all over your face. I think many FReepers "won't" use this because of that.
Yeah, I’ve been accused of being a paid Democrat operative in FReeper land. That’s fine. I guess my point is that Larry’s tale is pretty insane. I have no idea whether he’s lying or not. But I do know that Barry’s “flying monkey’s” are going to end up making Larry a real issue if they go after him the way they are.
Which is a mistake, if they want to win in November.
Comment:
“Yeah, I’ve been accused of being a paid Democrat operative in FReeper land.”
I’m not accusing you of being paid.
“But I do know that Barry’s “flying monkey’s” are going to end up making Larry a real issue if they go after him the way they are.”
My original palpitations concerned the tone of your post.
Question, why would any Freeper who understands the danger Obama brings to Americas political health be so concerned about his jack booted truth squad team of smear merchants “Flying Monkeys” making Larry Sinclair more than his current low life status?
“Which is a mistake, if they want to win in November.”
As a FReeper I know from prior radical left wing liberal actions that Democrats do not have the honorable, proper, decent, honest, moral or ethical capacity to NOT make the mistakes your are concerned about.
Given enough rope, Democrats will always tie a frilly yellow ribbon round the old Oak tree and angrily hang themselves.
I agree, they always hang themselves. They’re too dumb to avoid that fate. I just hate it when they try to hang the rest of us with them!!
Sorry, if I came across the wrong way. I stay pretty level headed on lots of things, and that tends to make me come across as sympathetic sometimes. Barry and his ilk are dangerous, and if you have any doubt as to my opinion of him, check out my blog: http://politicalxfile.blogspot.com/
I think you’ll find I’m the anti-Obama. :-D
Comment:
OK, I accept that and will quit with the somewhat snide replies.
I am more afraid of Obama’s danger to America than I have ever been of a presidential candidate.
The Democrat party could have chosen many other more qualified Black candidates to carry their mantel but instead chose a person with a very checkered past of radical associations with people who are no better in my estimation than human feces.
The first statement on their website IS a lie. Same old same old, Democrats lie.
Don't tell me you mean... the New York Times!?
Don’t insult Curious George like that! I happen to like that little guy.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.